Yeah, and she's still body positive. Funny, that
The 33-year-old Grammy winner sat down for an extensive interview with Oprah Winfrey on CBS' "One Night Only" special on Sunday.
www.insider.com
So what's the happy middle ground between shaming and not-shaming?
Well, there's the bit where there's a fairly high profile new one
BOSTON, April 28, 2021—A new study published today in JAMA Surgery found that gender-affirming surgery is associated with improved mental health outcomes
fenwayhealth.org
But don't you think it's pretty ridiculous that others were mad that she lost weight and got healthy? What type of person would prefer someone else to be less healthy? It's great that Adele is in a mentally good enough place to not let such bullshit affect her (not using social media much is always great for your mental health). But what about the people mad at her, you think they will ever acknowledge they are unhealthy and get better? And then the message of being fat is OK only gets more people into that same mindset. Just because you catch literally catch obesity from others doesn't mean it can't spread similar to a virus; parents that eat unhealthy will like have their kids eating unhealthy too. The community benefit of banning liquid candy will be enormous.
You can acknowledge that stuff like pop/fries/etc is really bad for someone and they should either heavily limit them or stop consuming them vs saying you're fat, you don't have to bring up what someone looks like at all.
That's the one study I mentioned that gets cited on like every one of those articles. One study doesn't equal the science is settled by a long shot.
OK. So addressing the issues with your body which cause discomfort and a lower quality of life is good, then. Glad you agree.
So you couldn't find the studies, right, there we find the source of your belief that it hasn't been studied. You couldn't find it, so instead of entertaining the possibility that you.... didn't look in the places where they are, you just leapt to the most arrogant conclusion: the studies must not exist.
Judging by the fact that your usual approach to finding evidence is trawling YouTube, this means squat.
The study was corrected. The correction doesn't lead to the bullshit conclusions they came to. If you want to find an even-handed or trustworthy investigation, maybe don't go to a right-wing anti-trans advocacy think-tank.
This has been your MO since the very start.
---
I searched the internet, why would that involve Youtube (to find studies)? And where are all these GRS studies when it's a rather new thing to be studied? Link to all these high quality (quality being the key word) studies if they exist. I totally can't trust your guys' opinions on a group when you all keep saying people like Dave Chappelle and Ricky Gervais are transphobic when they are not. And, again, I don't care enough to argue whether some group is anti-trans or not; is data wrong or not? That's all that matters. Attack the data vs making ad-hominem attacks against people or groups. So what if they are indeed anti-trans, are they wrong and if so, why are they wrong.
And this is why I totally can't trust your analysis on much of anything. How was my source's conclusions on the correction "bullshit"? Seems like they said exactly what the correction said. Is AJP an anti-trans organization too?
While this comparison was performed retrospectively and was not part of the original research question given that several other factors may differ between the groups, the results demonstrated no advantage of surgery in relation to subsequent mood or anxiety disorder-related health care visits or prescriptions or hospitalizations following suicide attempts in that comparison. Given that the study used neither a prospective cohort design nor a randomized controlled trial design, the conclusion that “the longitudinal association between gender-affirming surgery and lower use of mental health treatment lends support to the decision to provide gender-affirming surgeries to transgender individuals who seek them” is too strong.
ajp.psychiatryonline.org
---
Nope, I've always gone with the data available at the time. How about all those excess deaths we are seeing now (that are above average) that have nothing to do with covid? Perhaps there was some warning about how in the long run that would happen from covid restrictions? Fauci, laughably, won't even admit closing schools was bad in hindsight, I wonder why our peer countries never closed schools nearly as long as the US or masked kids.
For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics is so wrong so many times, yet your gonna say they go by actual science? They told parents not to expose kids to peanuts (based on no science) and only caused more people having peanut allergies. That even goes against basic common sense science of allergies.
Also, funny how people not in the US are able to blatantly say the AAP is posting straight-up misinformation? Leave the US bubble of "science" and you're not gonna like what it says.
Since you all like Twitter so much, here ya go:
I'm guessing your comeback to that will be Michael Absoud is from an anti-kid think tank or some bullshit like that.
segm.org
