Which isn't what you claimed, or what you said you had sources for.
Unstoppable against it's enemies, you mean. Not the same thing, even if it's enemies happen to be some of the authoritarians.
My source said that, why do I have to track down everyone that thinks that? Why do you care about if say more experts agree with you than me? If that's what you think makes you more correct, I don't really care as I care about what makes the most logical sense, which the vast majority of sources don't care about. I wanna know exactly how you get diabetes or heart disease or whatever, I don't care that something is associated with a disease because then I'd just ask how does that directly link to said disease (and it's a "don't know"). Nutrition guidelines, as the late Sarah Hallberg said, should be ignored when it comes to diabetes because they don't make sense. And you're citing these sources that tell people the wrong things and act like it makes your position more correct than mine.
Bullshit. Your source categorically did not say that. Even your own description of that source didn't say that.
It said several researchers feel sugar is the cause of insulin resistance, which causes diabetes.
It says several researchers feel sugar is a cause, while others don't.
Major cause. Based on the mechanisms we know, sugar does seem to be the direct cause to insulin resistance, that then causes diabetes. All that happens before you have visceral fat surrounding key organs like the liver and pancreas.
I'm still waiting for your sources on the claim that sugar is definitely the sole and direct cause of type 2 Diabetes. Where are they?
Again, I showed you the evidence that sugar is the cause of insulin resistance, that is the cause of diabetes...
Again: you provided sources saying sugar was possibly considered a cause. This was not your original claim.
It showed it was thought by some experts to be a direct contributor.
Excess sugar in the liver activates ChREBP, which stops the body from taking in excess sugar no matter how much insulin the pancreas produces.
K. So where are those sources you mentioned stating that overeating sugar is definitely the sole and direct cause of type 2 diabetes? This is the eleventh time asking. If you can't find any, just say so.
Not the same thing. Where are those sources stating that overeating sugar is definitely the sole and direct cause of type 2 diabetes?
Here Phoenix, I will help you out far more than you actually deserve. I'll treat you like how I have to handle some of the overly technical people at work and write out your message for you. All you have to do is literally copy-paste the following into your own
Avnger's Guide to Owning Your Fuckups
Is it the only thing that does that? Could, say, a chain of sugars-- a carbohydrate-- also do that? Could consuming fats or proteins in sufficient quantities also do it? These are the kinds of details Silvanus wants you to provide, I think.