Was that the one that could make calls, but still was the top rated smartphone on multiple sites?ike42 said:Didn't they already prove this to be true with the iphone 4s?
Was that the one that could make calls, but still was the top rated smartphone on multiple sites?ike42 said:Didn't they already prove this to be true with the iphone 4s?
Yeah cause those people who had been with mobile phone makers for a long time did not jump ship the iphone came out.Justice4L said:Apple already made a console years ago and it failed, failed miserably.
I don't see why people who have been with major companies for years and years would suddenly jump ship to a company who might fail in the modern console market like they did years ago.
So the tablet that no OEM has been able to beat or even match in price is very overpriced? Android costs nothing and they still can't get a tablet that is price competitive to the market. Even on computers Apple is much more price competitive than they used to be. Intel is spending ridiculous amounts trying to get OEMs producing machines that compete with the MacBook Air and they simply can't produce a machine with similar specs for even the same price, let alone lower.Worgen said:Apple already has a popular console, its called the ipad and its very over priced.
The ipad I won was 800, sure it can do some pretty impressive graphics but most things on it are flash games, just with a much greater chance of crashing. Its an over priced toy.Garrett Richey said:tellSo the tablet that no OEM has been able to beat or even match in price is very overpriced? Android costs nothing and they still can't get a tablet that is price competitive to the market. Even on computers Apple is much more price competitive than they used to be. Intel is spending ridiculous amounts trying to get OEMs producing machines that compete with the MacBook Air and they simply can't produce a machine with similar specs for even the same price, let alone lower.Worgen said:Apple already has a popular console, its called the ipad and its very over priced.
Check your facts before you make statements.
So the fact that a company updates products every year in areas where ABSOLUTELY EVERYONE DOES THIS! means that they would in a completely different market?Vankraken said:Yes lets enter the Console market when you already make an OS and computers that are well known for being platform of choice for computer gaming. /trollface
Seriously apple's design philosophy of release another version every year is ill suited for the long cycle time of consoles. In addition Apple appeals to the casual consumer (go into an Apple store and you will see a lot of elderly people, middle aged moms, and families) and why would you want to get into a casual gamer war against Nintendo?
It may not be suited to your purposes, but that doesn't mean it's an overpriced toy. It's being used in hospitals to access patient records, airlines are using them to replace many pounds of paper material for pilots. Something capable of replacing paper in industries that have stuck with them up to now is far more than a 'toy'.Worgen said:The ipad I won was 800, sure it can do some pretty impressive graphics but most things on it are flash games, just with a much greater chance of crashing. Its an over priced toy.Garrett Richey said:tellSo the tablet that no OEM has been able to beat or even match in price is very overpriced? Android costs nothing and they still can't get a tablet that is price competitive to the market. Even on computers Apple is much more price competitive than they used to be. Intel is spending ridiculous amounts trying to get OEMs producing machines that compete with the MacBook Air and they simply can't produce a machine with similar specs for even the same price, let alone lower.Worgen said:Apple already has a popular console, its called the ipad and its very over priced.
Check your facts before you make statements.
Ok, its an overpriced flash/pdf player that cant play flash. Tablets can be useful but there are still better things out there.Garrett Richey said:It may not be suited to your purposes, but that doesn't mean it's an overpriced toy. It's being used in hospitals to access patient records, airlines are using them to replace many pounds of paper material for pilots. Something capable of replacing paper in industries that have stuck with them up to now is far more than a 'toy'.Worgen said:The ipad I won was 800, sure it can do some pretty impressive graphics but most things on it are flash games, just with a much greater chance of crashing. Its an over priced toy.Garrett Richey said:tellSo the tablet that no OEM has been able to beat or even match in price is very overpriced? Android costs nothing and they still can't get a tablet that is price competitive to the market. Even on computers Apple is much more price competitive than they used to be. Intel is spending ridiculous amounts trying to get OEMs producing machines that compete with the MacBook Air and they simply can't produce a machine with similar specs for even the same price, let alone lower.Worgen said:Apple already has a popular console, its called the ipad and its very over priced.
Check your facts before you make statements.
That's as bad as the bullshit of "uncontrolled acceleration" myth.Satsuki666 said:Actually its been proven that the iPhones have an extremely high dropped call rate but that consumers dont give a shit because nobody actually calls people on them anymore.Treblaine said:The wider evidence is that iPod and iPhones ARE very reliable and only weasel arguments can be made against them.
Mate, that's a typical response of an Apple fanchild to someone whose put their products down. I wouldn't worry about it. They can't take the fact that their products may not be the flawed, overrated shiny toys they really are and thus blame the user for any problems encountered.believer258 said:I knew this would come up. Someone saying that I obviously didn't take care of them...Treblaine said:Err, how did they break? Did you ever consider that you were very careless with this rather high specification technology?believer258 said:You know, I've bought two iPods in my life, and both of them lasted about twenty days. Twenty days, whereas I just gave a cheap supposedly throwaway piece of shit that I've had for years to a relative of mine.
For example, the use of glass screens to be hard enough so it isn't worn down rough with a thousand tiny scratches also makes it brittle (so will likely crack if dropped unprotected), this is not a rough-an-tumble device for people who don't care about a scratched screen, this is a delicate high standard device.
I am still struggling to find a device that comes close to filling the same roll as my iPod Touch in its capability and flexibility as such a light and compact computer and media device.
Sure you can say you don't care about the 960x640 scratch resistant screen, don't care about all the apps, don't care about the music quality, don't care about the gyroscope... but that's not more saying iPods aren't suitable for you, not that they are "shit".
But it's so adorable to watch people pretend it didn't happen even after that was admitted by apple.Satsuki666 said:Its not a myth apple even outright admitted that that was an issue.
Can I ask why this disclaimer is neccesary? Literally every single Escapist contributer has said this when discussing Steve Job's death or Apple in general.Hevva said:Although I can't claim to own any of said products
Nautical Honors Society said:Can I ask why this disclaimer is neccesary?Hevva said:Although I can't claim to own any of said products
Did you guys know the 16GB iPad 1 costed only 229.35? to manufacture at most, with the biggest cost being the flash memory rounding up to about 80??Worgen said:Very true, apple could never do a console since they would always want to charge way too much for it. Hell, most of apples computers have been closer to consoles with how closed off those damn things are. You can do anything you want with an apple as long as apple lets you.vivalahelvig said:Just think though, with a console, they are obviously worth more than a handheld, they could charge over 3000$ for this baby! And then the next year they bump the price up 300$, then the next and the next!Worgen said:Apple already has a popular console, its called the ipad and its very over priced.
I'm better 50$ if this happens!
Thanks for the article. It is good to know that Gabe isn't entirely a Mac fanboy and holds reservations, but one thing he states at the end puts the fail on EA in their rant against Steam. Once you have Steamworks, you can change your mind at any time.Dexter111 said:That's just simple truth, not an argument... the more control a corporate entity has over the platform, the worse for the actual consumers cause they can dictate everything and price gouge at every point if they decide they want to, if they'd raise the "Online fees" (which are retarded^10 to start with by another 10$ there'd still be a large portion of the ones paying them now doing the same and trying to justify it to themselves somehow like "XBox Live is sooo much better than everything else".samsonguy920 said:Gabe can say some crazy things but he has yet to be a hypocrite(Check that, name starts with an 's'). And I am confused at your argument that closed platforms are bad for a consumer, as every game console is a closed platform. There was one attempt at making an open platform console based on Linux. The company that tried that didn't survive that failure.
Also, that was also one of Gabe's main points... see here: http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/10/12/valves-newell-its-ominous-that-open-platforms-are-less-popular-apple-wrong-philosophically/
The person I was referring to never gives evidence and just spits out bullshit (the first 2 letters are So). You at least gave some reasons. And that apple console you thought up sounds less like a console and one of those ipod docking station things.Plinglebob said:Screw it, I'll take the bait (though I'm a P, not an Svivalahelvig said:Edit: I suspect a bunch of people will say something about how he is a hypocrit, because his company made steam. I believe their name will begin with s.). Yes it is hypocritical for someone who has done more to wall off and enclose PC to complain about closed systems. Their success and the good they've done in other areas of PC gaming (indie, making digital downloads viable) doesn't stop Steam from being as bad as Xbox Live or iTunes in this one area.
More OT, I doubt Apple will go with the traditional console. The most likely route will be a box under the TV offering out the box a number of features other companies have added to their consoles (iPlayer, Facebook, Film downloads through iTunes etc) and have games as a side bonus just like they did with the iPad/iPhone. The upside is there will finally be a console I won't feel forced to buy.
Also, I can't take Mr Newell seriously when he goes on about closed systems and not because of my rant above. Each time he does it, it just sounds like someone whining because he's not being aloud to do things the way he wants too to make money. I still remember the massive change of heart he had regarding developing for consoles after Sony let him shove Steam onto the PS3.