Then please explain to me what I'm missing and how you are not asking someone to re-analyze what they are creating because you have an issue with it.Colour Scientist said:I...Tiamat666 said:It must make sense in the context of the story! Dragons make sense in the context of the story! Undead make sense in the context of the story! A black knight in Winterfell or Casterly Rock? How would that make sense? That would be just as retarded as the black guy nordic portal god in Thor. IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE! And if you DO make something like that, then at the very least it has to be explained, and not just add the racial diversity for the sake of the political correctness BS.Colour Scientist said:Yeah because Westeros is so true to medieval Europe.Coruptin said:Inb4
Anecdotal examples of a few notable non-Caucasians in medieval Europe
Dragons? Fine.
People coming back from the dead? Makes sense.
More people of colour in important roles? Don't be so unrealistic.
Are you serious?
I'm going to pretend that you're joking.
It's funny how including someone "for the sake of it" only ever comes up in relation to the inclusion of minorities.
No one here has said that.Redd the Sock said:We get an answer, but he issue gets pressed like people are trying to get a different answer. "come on, admit you didn't think about it. Admit you're a racist / sexist / homophobe you fucking bigot."
Whatever, you people can continue to get your knickers in a twist about "political correctness" if you want, feel free to hide behind the claim that you're defending artistic integrity and realism.
I'll never understand why the potential inclusion of minorities in narratives gets so many people worked up.
I'm not saying it's wrong. I'm saying people go about it without thinking about how accusatory they can become, or even the question itself is. "I don't like something an author has done, and once he explains himself, I'll dismiss the answer and tell him how poor a reason it is because I think it's wrong."