Lair of the Shadow Broker didn't really have anything to do with the main plot either, but it was awesome. Same with Overlord. BW usually seems to be on point with their DLC. I think it could be greatdreadedcandiru99 said:For me, it's about the destination. The journey might or might not be fun and worthwhile as well, but the destination is the reason you set out on the journey in the first place. In fact, it seems to me that a journey without a destination isn't a journey at all--it's just aimlessly farting around.
Yeah but a Reaper would probably know how to fight, disable or outright destroy other Reapers. So one rogue Reaper could very well make it a turning point. PLus UI could see Bioware sneaking in a "Happy Everyone Wins" ending if you get like a perfect game with having the Reaper. So you'd have control, destroy, synthesis, obliteration and OMG we won!!NinjaDeathSlap said:Erm, even with one Reaper on your side, it's still one against about 100,000, and when the entire combined might of the Galaxy was pretty clearly only enough to act as an effective diversion for one battle...Mr.Tea said:You know, this would've brought up the question of "with an actual Reaper on our side, maybe there's a small chance we can win this war"
...if we didn't already know how it all ends.
So unless this adds another ending possibility, what's the bloody point??
Yeah, even if you add one Reaper to that I'm still not liking those odds.
Ah, ok, I see what you mean now. Thanks for clearing that up.Mr.Tea said:You can imagine I didn't mean that in terms of firepower.NinjaDeathSlap said:Erm, even with one Reaper on your side, it's still one against about 100,000, and when the entire combined might of the Galaxy was pretty clearly only enough to act as an effective diversion for one battle...Mr.Tea said:You know, this would've brought up the question of "with an actual Reaper on our side, maybe there's a small chance we can win this war"
...if we didn't already know how it all ends.
So unless this adds another ending possibility, what's the bloody point??
Yeah, even if you add one Reaper to that I'm still not liking those odds.
Up 'till now we haven't even known why our main enemy wanted to kill us beyond what amounts to: "Just 'cause". And the very few (2) of them we even had a chance to "communicate" with demonstrated a 100% unshakeable resolve in their goal of our annihilation.
The mere fact that one of them could ever ally with us changes everything! Much like Legion alone turned our entire perspective on the Geth on its head...
I still think that would be too far-fetched tbh. True, a Reaper might have a greater insight into weaknesses of the Reapers. However, being a Reaper itself means it would also have those same weaknesses, and there's no reason why the rest of the Reapers wouldn't be able to exploit its weaknesses just as well as it could exploit theirs.Ashannon Blackthorn said:Yeah but a Reaper would probably know how to fight, disable or outright destroy other Reapers. So one rogue Reaper could very well make it a turning point. PLus UI could see Bioware sneaking in a "Happy Everyone Wins" ending if you get like a perfect game with having the Reaper. So you'd have control, destroy, synthesis, obliteration and OMG we won!!NinjaDeathSlap said:Erm, even with one Reaper on your side, it's still one against about 100,000, and when the entire combined might of the Galaxy was pretty clearly only enough to act as an effective diversion for one battle...Mr.Tea said:You know, this would've brought up the question of "with an actual Reaper on our side, maybe there's a small chance we can win this war"
...if we didn't already know how it all ends.
So unless this adds another ending possibility, what's the bloody point??
Yeah, even if you add one Reaper to that I'm still not liking those odds.
True, but think of it this way. Reaper Traitor says "Hey, if you do x and y and follow it with z, you can disable a reaper from miles away."NinjaDeathSlap said:I still think that would be too far-fetched tbh. True, a Reaper might have a greater insight into weaknesses of the Reapers. However, being a Reaper itself means it would also have those same weaknesses, and there's no reason why the rest of the Reapers wouldn't be able to exploit its weaknesses just as well as it could exploit theirs.
Normally I feel the same way. But if the game releases and someone on the dev team says "hey, wouldn't it be cool if..." and they want to retroactively insert new story or a new adventure. Instead of farting around doing little that the consumer can see, they develop this. To me this is the proper and most fair use of DLC in the industry, as opposed to day one on disc stuff. So they toss a nugget of single player goodness my way. If the price is right I may just pick it up and skip a cheeseburger somewhere.dreadedcandiru99 said:For me, it's about the destination. The journey might or might not be fun and worthwhile as well, but the destination is the reason you set out on the journey in the first place. In fact, it seems to me that a journey without a destination isn't a journey at all--it's just aimlessly farting around.Roboto said:It's about the journey, not the destination.
It wouldn't surprise me! However they really wouldn't be doing themseves much favour by crating another ending or changing the one at the end of the game (not going to say original as the actual original ending got changed), and then charging us to find out what it is! The only thing that could make it slighty appealing is the chance to see a Reaper in another light! But then surely that would make more sense to keep it in th game! Same with From Ashes! That needed to be in the game or at least free if you bought it new! It made such a difference story wise.Riff Moonraker said:Or.... what if it did? What if it was planned to put another ending in the game all along? Far fetched, yes... but its not an unreasonable line of thought, either.Kungfu_Teddybear said:On one hand, this sounds really cool.
On the other hand, who cares if we get him in the final battle? It's not going to change the endings.
Despite popular reviewer opinion, I think the journey was pretty shit too. I was not impressed by the writing or repeated plot contrivances all throughout ME3.Roboto said:It's about the journey, not the destination.Mr.Tea said:You know, this would've brought up the question of "with an actual Reaper on our side, maybe there's a small chance we can win this war"
...if we didn't already know how it all ends.
So unless this adds another ending possibility, what's the bloody point??
Anything that adds more lore and backstory is fine by me. They left plenty up to the imagination.
Really? Really?The script revolves around a rogue Reaper called Leviathan, which has betrayed the Reapers by killing one of its own and now acts as a defector from the invading army