Gamers Rage About Bayonetta 2 on Wii U

[BatteringVulpine]

Oh no, a game I liked on one console is being released exclusively on a completely difference console. What will I, as an internet-using person of America do with my money?

Seriously though, this kind of thing is ridiculous. Excepting the people that are apparently suicidal over this news, who is this hurting? Sequels being exclusive to different consoles is nothing new. I liked Bayonetta, and I like Nintendo, so who cares? If you don't like it, don't buy it. Don't threaten suicide like some sort of self-entitled brat thinking it will get you the attention you want.

EDIT: Just got linked to a blog post [http://www.bearhawkink.com/pristerra/?p=178] on my FB about someone else who thinks this outrage is bonkers.

 

[Trishbot]

I'm a Bayonetta fan, own it on 360, and I love it.

And I'm more than okay with Bayonetta 2 being on the Wii U.

If you're a real "fan" of a series you'll following the series, not the console it's on. If that was the case, my Metal Gear collection wouldn't look like this: Metal Gear Solid 1 (Playstation and Gamecube), Metal Gear Solid 2 (Xbox), Metal Gear Solid 3 (Playstation 2), Metal Gear Solid 4 (PS3).

I followed Resident Evil to the Gamecube. We got some FANTASTIC Resident Evil games on Gamecube, some of which are STILL only on Gamecube. That's fine in my book.

 

[Adon Cabre]

Snip

ONCE again. PUTTING words in capitals DOESN'T improve your POINT! IT just makes YOU sound ANGRY!

The Wii U is an improvement over the PS3 and the Xbox 360, therefore it is next gen. It has a better GPU, a better proccesor, more RAM and a faster disc read speed. Just because Nintendo haven't done the incredibly stupid, and risky thing of making there next console extremely powerful and high-end doesn't mean it's not next gen.

It's called EMPHASIS. Capitalisation is not just for shouting or anger.

PS3 was - technically - an improvement over Xbox 360, that does NOT make it a generation ahead.

And WiiU is confirmed for inferior in one way, no HDD install. HDD is faster for loading and scan time than ANY blu-ray drive.

The important details of GPU and CPU specs of WiiU have NOT been revealed. From what we have seen so far of WiiU graphics it is not significantly more capable.

If you're not even close to an order of magnitude ahead, you're NOT next-gen. If gaming didn't advance with each generation, we'd all still be on 8-bit.

This [http://www.cityzen.tv/content/pix3/gun4.jpg] is from Gun, a launch game for the 360. This [http://gamingbolt.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/assassins-creed-3-2.jpg] is from ACIII, an upcoming game. Notice the extreme graphical difference? Now notice that the WiiU has graphics that visually are on par with the 360 and PS3 from the get go, and we can see that yes, it is a significant graphical upgrade.

Are you still going on about the hard drive? They are a gaming company, they don't expect you to be putting music and videos on their consoles. And if you buy a lot of digital games, then you can just go get a external drive and transfer data as needed. I really don't see the problem here.

If we are arguing technical abilities, then the PS2 wasn't 6th Gen. It was inferior to the GameCube and was significantly inferior to the X-Box. So what do you say, was the PS2 really 5th gen?

It's not really on-par with these generation of hard core consoles. There are some graphical inferiority in lighting that I saw in their Arkham City promo vid, but it's nothing terribly eye catching.

As far as I'm concerned, Nintendo is just barely catching up; in that now they're seeing the industry for what it's becoming.

OK, slight differences at launch. You know, when people are still learning how to make the most efficient use of the console. Like I said, look at Gun compared to ACIII. It's a pretty big change.

But this isn't an exclusive; expect all ports to look as... well, not as good on the Wii U since they were more purposed for the other consoles who can better handle the demand. ACIII on Wii U looks nice, but a large part of the game seems to be offering little diverse change. We've yet to see that ship sequence on the Wii U -- that will show us how it handles lighting.

The other problem is that, while the Xbox 360 already needs multiple disks for PS3 ports, what about a virtually non-existant Wii U? That's trouble. Konami's Fox Engine looks like it might be too much.

 

[Adon Cabre]

Snip

I actually find Arkham City to look better on the Wii U from what I've seen. More stuff's about, and there's much more lighting. And anyway, the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions are way behind the PC version, that doesn't make then last-gen consoles at all.

Well I guess you like glossy lighting and misty-blurred backgrounds. Wii U just hit the PS3 and Xbox Generation, although with mild tech capacities. And developers are fidgety with releasing anything on PC since plenty of those Gamers thieve around on torrents.

What PC version? A PC can be upgraded annually if you have the money, and which plenty of us do not; nor do we care to dig inside our towers. (People like me just don't care enough, yet.)

 

[Aarowbeatsdragon]

I would like to play Bayonetta 2. I do not want to get a WiiU and I do not see that changeing as I hate motion controls.

But....Beyonetta and all WiiU games with the exception of co-op modes in games will be using the gamepad with no motion control needed.

OT. I gotta be honest, while it sickens me that these so called "hardcore" gamers are giving us real gamers a bad name, its been fun reading about it.

 

[CaptainMarvelous]

Why can they not release it on multiple consoles? Why are people ok with exclusives? How is it somehow fine for a game to be actively denied to people for no other reason than to force them to buy another console? This is just another casuality to a seriously anti consumer practice.

Oh and to those who think they are somehow mighty for belittling people who cant play the sequel to a game they liked: You arent being clever, you're being dickheads. Why on earth should people be forced to buy a console for games which clearly are not specific to the console in question?

Because the people who make the console are paying the bill to get the game made? Why should they use their money to make a sequel to a game everyone else gave up on, then make it for competitors consoles so other companies can have it, so you can avoid giving them your money for a console they've made and a game they have paid to publish? Not to mention it's WiiU so likely it WILL be exclusive to the console, and you expect Nintendo to foot the bill so it can ported to the X-Box 720 and the PS4? That sounds reasonable to you?

Seriously, it's pretty much entirely how the big three compete by who has the best exclusives, no-one would be saying shit if it was an X-box exclusive. Hell, there are people on this forum who still don't think Bethesda's handling of Dawnguard was f*cking shoddy by releasing it for X-box 2 months ahead of PS3 and PC, and that's a legitimate issue as it isn't hard to port DLC.

More OT: We don't ***** about Halo being only on X-Box or God of War only being on Playstation, it just so happens Bayonetta is now only going to be on WiiU. And? If you want to play the game I guess you're going to have to give WiiU a try, if you don't then give Platinum Games the money it needs out of your own pocket to buy back full publishing rights and make a game for the X-box or whatever. It'll only cost you something like 15 million dollars (conservative f*cking estimate there).

It's like Nintendo want us to buy their products or something crazy like that!

Get off your high horse, you arent as smart as you think you are. Nintendo is publishing the game, great! That doesnt mean its good for gaming to have that game be denied to other gamers purely to sell a console. I dont agree with exclusives, I think anyone who supports exclusives that are exclusive because one company wants to get an edge by denying the game to other consoles is retarded.

I can see why keeping the game exclusive to the Wii U is smart for Nintendo, I cant see how thats good for us. I dont want to buy a Wii U, not out of malice but because I cant afford to buy a Wii U and and Xbox 720 (if indeed I get another generation of console, depends on my circumstances. The 360 seems to be the strongest of the 3 consoles, going with that im gonna go to the next iteration of it. Plus I like the exclusives and all my freinds are getting it, though it having exclusives is no more ok than the Wii U or PS3 having exclusives purely for competition). Im not "avoiding giving them money for a console they've made", which somehow insinuates Im at fault for not buying it at all because they spent money making it, I just cant buy it in my circumstances because they are denying it on platforms I play on.

I dont know the full situation with Dawngaurd, if Microsoft paid for some sort of exclusivity then non-xbox gamers should not be denied the DLC. It isnt fair on gamers, even if the devs are better off. Halo should be on PS3 and God of War should be on xbox. Gamers are not benefiting from this competition, theres no good reason for us to support it.

I would love nothing more than for Bayonetta 2 to be available to everyone, unfortunately Platinum games decided they couldnt self publish (though they could publish the abysmal 'Vanquish') it and Nintendo is now publishing. That isnt my fault. Why is it somehow fine for Nintendo to act against our interests but not Activision or EA? They both go against our interests and are hated for it, why is it ok here?

Right, for clarity, you're immediately saying you won't buy the Wii U, instead you're going for the next X-Box. Why is that? Because it has better business practices? No, in your own words because of the exclusives (and some bonus reasons like familiarty or your friends had it but at some point down the line you bought it for the games, because that's why all of us choose one console or other, either we played Mario and enjoyed it or a good round of Halo, it's just how they're distinguished). My big issue with this thread in general is that nobody is complaining about Epic, Bungie, Sucker Punch, Nintendo bought a studio to make a game and because it's not on THEIR console there's outrage. It's just a touch hypocritical.

I agree that console exclusives aren't fantastic when you lack the console, but Bayonetta 2 wouldn't even exist unless Nintendo footed the bill and if the price to pay is it's only on their console well... Zelda isn't on X-Box either. Your comparison to Activision and EA is also a poor analogue, since those companies do go across all consoles they just happen to be douchebags to gamers in general. I'm not saying it's your fault that Platinum weren't going to release Bayonetta 2 or develop it but Nintendo have also sunk a HUGE amount of money in getting a 'grown up' exclusive. If Microsoft spent huge amounts of money to buy Sucker Punch away from Sony and make inFamous 3 I'd probably be annoyed since I prefer Playstation, but I'm admitting to it and I also get that the only reason they're DOING it is to sell their product and since I like the game I might consider switching.

You can be pissed off that a game you'd like to play is going to be on a console you've decided you don't want but Nintendo isn't doing anything malicious or intentionally to screw gamers which is why I'm defending them. Microsoft could have bought Platinum, Sony could have done it, they didn't. I don't ***** out Microsoft for buying out Rare and killing them (no matter how heinous that sin was) so I tend to get snarky when someone does the reverse.

 

[CaptainMarvelous]

Why can they not release it on multiple consoles? Why are people ok with exclusives? How is it somehow fine for a game to be actively denied to people for no other reason than to force them to buy another console? This is just another casuality to a seriously anti consumer practice.

Oh and to those who think they are somehow mighty for belittling people who cant play the sequel to a game they liked: You arent being clever, you're being dickheads. Why on earth should people be forced to buy a console for games which clearly are not specific to the console in question?

Because the people who make the console are paying the bill to get the game made? Why should they use their money to make a sequel to a game everyone else gave up on, then make it for competitors consoles so other companies can have it, so you can avoid giving them your money for a console they've made and a game they have paid to publish? Not to mention it's WiiU so likely it WILL be exclusive to the console, and you expect Nintendo to foot the bill so it can ported to the X-Box 720 and the PS4? That sounds reasonable to you?

Seriously, it's pretty much entirely how the big three compete by who has the best exclusives, no-one would be saying shit if it was an X-box exclusive. Hell, there are people on this forum who still don't think Bethesda's handling of Dawnguard was f*cking shoddy by releasing it for X-box 2 months ahead of PS3 and PC, and that's a legitimate issue as it isn't hard to port DLC.

More OT: We don't ***** about Halo being only on X-Box or God of War only being on Playstation, it just so happens Bayonetta is now only going to be on WiiU. And? If you want to play the game I guess you're going to have to give WiiU a try, if you don't then give Platinum Games the money it needs out of your own pocket to buy back full publishing rights and make a game for the X-box or whatever. It'll only cost you something like 15 million dollars (conservative f*cking estimate there).

It's like Nintendo want us to buy their products or something crazy like that!

Get off your high horse, you arent as smart as you think you are. Nintendo is publishing the game, great! That doesnt mean its good for gaming to have that game be denied to other gamers purely to sell a console. I dont agree with exclusives, I think anyone who supports exclusives that are exclusive because one company wants to get an edge by denying the game to other consoles is retarded.

I can see why keeping the game exclusive to the Wii U is smart for Nintendo, I cant see how thats good for us. I dont want to buy a Wii U, not out of malice but because I cant afford to buy a Wii U and and Xbox 720 (if indeed I get another generation of console, depends on my circumstances. The 360 seems to be the strongest of the 3 consoles, going with that im gonna go to the next iteration of it. Plus I like the exclusives and all my freinds are getting it, though it having exclusives is no more ok than the Wii U or PS3 having exclusives purely for competition). Im not "avoiding giving them money for a console they've made", which somehow insinuates Im at fault for not buying it at all because they spent money making it, I just cant buy it in my circumstances because they are denying it on platforms I play on.

I dont know the full situation with Dawngaurd, if Microsoft paid for some sort of exclusivity then non-xbox gamers should not be denied the DLC. It isnt fair on gamers, even if the devs are better off. Halo should be on PS3 and God of War should be on xbox. Gamers are not benefiting from this competition, theres no good reason for us to support it.

I would love nothing more than for Bayonetta 2 to be available to everyone, unfortunately Platinum games decided they couldnt self publish (though they could publish the abysmal 'Vanquish') it and Nintendo is now publishing. That isnt my fault. Why is it somehow fine for Nintendo to act against our interests but not Activision or EA? They both go against our interests and are hated for it, why is it ok here?

Right, for clarity, you're immediately saying you won't buy the Wii U, instead you're going for the next X-Box. Why is that? Because it has better business practices? No, in your own words because of the exclusives (and some bonus reasons like familiarty or your friends had it but at some point down the line you bought it for the games, because that's why all of us choose one console or other, either we played Mario and enjoyed it or a good round of Halo, it's just how they're distinguished). My big issue with this story in general is that nobody is complaining about Epic, Bungie, Sucker Punch, Nintendo bought a studio to make a game and because it's not on THEIR console there's outrage. It's just a touch hypocritical.

I agree that console exclusives aren't fantastic when you lack the console, but Bayonetta 2 wouldn't even exist unless Nintendo footed the bill and if the price to pay is it's only on their console well... Zelda isn't on X-Box either. Your comparison to Activision and EA is also a poor analogue, since those companies do go across all consoles they just happen to be douchebags to gamers in general. I'm not saying it's your fault that Platinum weren't going to release Bayonetta 2 or develop it but Nintendo have also sunk a HUGE amount of money in getting a 'grown up' exclusive. If Microsoft spent huge amounts of money to buy Sucker Punch away from Sony and make inFamous 3 I'd probably be annoyed since I prefer Playstation, but I'm admitting to it and I also get that the only reason they're DOING it is to sell their product and since I like the game I might consider switching.

You can be pissed off that a game you'd like to play is going to be on a console you've decided you don't want but Nintendo isn't doing anything malicious or intentionally to screw gamers which is why I'm defending them. Microsoft could have bought Platinum, Sony could have done it, they didn't. I don't ***** out Microsoft for buying out Rare and killing them (no matter how heinous that sin was) so I tend to get snarky when someone does the reverse.

 

[acosn]

...What's wrong with the Wii-U?

Probably nothing, people just don't like being forced to buy a new console to carry on a series they've already bought into.

Well, then those people should have done more to support the game so it could have continued on it's previous path. Instead, it didn't make enough money and Sega refused to publish it.

....... don.... done more to support them? What would you have them do? Fund the fuckin game?

Take that weakshit argument outa here.

It's perfectly accurate though.

The game didn't sell well enough. Ergo Sega didn't want to double down when they were already losing. Business isn't a fucking game.

Yet Nintendo see a profit in flagshipping it.

It's not an accurate criticism. How are fans supposed to do more than buy the game? Sega didn't want to publish and that's fine. If they were worried about low sales that's what they should have done, but you don't then go and blame the fans for not doing enough to support the IP despite having bought the game.

That's fucking retard logic.

Nintendo's consumer base is different from Sony's and Microsoft's. After bringing in the elephant to the room called casual gaming and tapping a market that last time it came in, crashed the fucking industry, Nintendo needs to re-align themselves as a middle-range platform because the casual audience is now wired to smart phones and tablets that Nintendo can't hope to compete with.


So they publish a game already in the works, and carry a different definition of what "success" is.


And I'd drop the persecution complex. No one's actually blaming you. We're just saying you weren't enough.

The point is that Sega didn't lose money on Bayonetta. It wasn't a hemorrhaging IP, it just didn't do as well as Sega wanted. So it got abandoned, which happens all the time in the AAA market. Nintendo are hoping that the IP acquisition will drag people over from Sony and Microsoft's corners. It did have enough buyers for it to be considered a minor or cult hit. But AAA publishers aren't interested in that. That isn't the fault of the fanbase but the companies who set the system up.

People don't blame Beyond good and evil fans because Ubisoft don't think it's profitable to make a second. Or timesplitters fans because activision are allergic to anything under a billion sales. Same principal here.

And actually by saying 'the fans should have done more' you are blaming the fans... so straighten out you argument.

You're not seeing a new Timesplitters game because Free Radical got picked up by Crytek, not because of hard financial reasons.

 

[Gizmo1990]

I would like to play Bayonetta 2. I do not want to get a WiiU and I do not see that changeing as I hate motion controls.

But....Beyonetta and all WiiU games with the exception of co-op modes in games will be using the gamepad with no motion control needed.

OT. I gotta be honest, while it sickens me that these so called "hardcore" gamers are giving us real gamers a bad name, its been fun reading about it.

See I did not know that. However there is no way in hell I am buying a new console for one game and I have no interest in playing the same mario game I played 15 years ago with better graphics.

I also agree with you. It has been fun watching all the douche nozzels go bat shit crazy.

 

[DTH1337]

You know, it's over-reactions like this that Jim Sterling has talked about on a number of videos, as well as this week. Bayonetta 2 on the Wii U is not a negative on the gaming industry.

This is a game that at first wasn't going to be released because Sega decided to abandon it due to financial issues. Thanks to Nintendo however, we can now rest assured that Bayonetta 2 will finally be released and we can finally kick and shoot more angels with the many weapons of Bayonetta, as well as be happy about the game (if it is any good, that is).

But of course, this is the internet, which has to overreact to announcements like this and make pathetic statements such as saying they will commit suicide because of the fact that this game is coming to the Wii U.

A sequel that many gamers have wanted is finally announced and the gamers aren't happy about it because it is on a console that they have likely not even played yet. That is simply what the haters are saying, and I have to ask "What the hell do you want, gamers?"

If Mirrors Edge 2 or Beyond Good & Evil 2 (sequels that gamers want to see made) were announced for the Wii U, and the gamers made this kind of over-reaction simply because it's on the Wii U, then I can guarantee you that they would get the backlash of the gaming community for being idiots.

 

[Vhite]

Few people ***** about Terraria going to consoles.
Escapist: "OMG PCGAMERS ARE WHINY DICKS!"
Few people ***** about Bayonetta going to WiiU.
Escapist: " Oh, how terribly ignorant of those people."

And I just generalized the same way because Im also part of Escapist and so balance of the universe has been kept.

 

[ToastiestZombie]

I would like to play Bayonetta 2. I do not want to get a WiiU and I do not see that changeing as I hate motion controls.

But....Beyonetta and all WiiU games with the exception of co-op modes in games will be using the gamepad with no motion control needed.

OT. I gotta be honest, while it sickens me that these so called "hardcore" gamers are giving us real gamers a bad name, its been fun reading about it.

See I did not know that. However there is no way in hell I am buying a new console for one game and I have no interest in playing the same mario game I played 15 years ago with better graphics.

I also agree with you. It has been fun watching all the douche nozzels go bat shit crazy.

You've also got Rayman: Legends, ZombiU, Monster Hunter 3 Deluxe, an AWESOME version of Tekken, Bayonetta 2, Pikmin 3, Super Smash Bros and a confirmed Zelda game coming exclusively on the Wii U. Stop thinking that just because NSMB isn't really all that innovative that it's the only game you'll get on the system that's worth looking at. And really, 3D Marios are always very different from the last, compare Super Mario Sunshine and Super Mario Galaxy then tell me you're playing the same game. Sure, they released a sequel to Galaxy, but I can guarantee you the 3D Mario for the Wii U will be very different.

OH! You've also got a brand new IP from Platinum called "The Wonderful 101", an exclusive lego game that's looking to be really fun, a game called Tank Tank Tanks! which just looks bonkers, Scribblenauts: Unlimited which looks amazing and Nintendo Land which looks like this generation's Wii Sports.

 

[Mikeyfell]

Well I'm mad too.
To a much lesser extent though, I always get pissed when a series switches consoles for NO reason.

Indigo Prophecy = Xbox
Heavy Rain = PS3

Record of Agarest War = Xobx 360
Agarest War zero = Xbox 360
Agarest 2 = PS3

Kotor 1&2 =Xbox
SW: TOR = PC

And now Bayonetta

They're just system sellers.
Wouldn't it make more sense to release games on all systems so you have the largest possible audience?

Just take solace in the knowledge that it's probably going to suck.

 

[ToastiestZombie]

Well I'm mad too.
To a much lesser extent though, I always get pissed when a series switches consoles for NO reason.

Indigo Prophecy = Xbox
Heavy Rain = PS3

Record of Agarest War = Xobx 360
Agarest War zero = Xbox 360
Agarest 2 = PS3

Kotor 1$2 =Xbox
SW: TOR = PC

And now Bayonetta

They're just system sellers.
Wouldn't it make more sense to release games on all systems so you have the largest possible audience?

Just take solace in the knowledge that it's probably going to suck.

No reason? You haven't heard that Sega had dropped the project, and nobody else wanted it because of it's crappy reception the first time so Nintendo picked the dying game up and gave them the funding and publishing to get it going again. So either this or no Bayonetta 2 at all, make your choice. Also, Kotor 1 and 2 were on the PC, and the MMO was an MMO, which have never worked on consoles especially a WoW type MMO like SW: TOR. And if every game was released for every system then what incentive would one have to buy another console? Why would someone buy a PS3 at launch for 600 dollars when they can just get an Xbox 360 or Wii for much less? They bought it for stuff like God Of War, Uncharted and Resistance, all of which were exclusives.

 

[Beautiful End]

Oh, god. "Punch a dolphin in the vagina". That is priceless. Made me lol hardcore.

But seriously, I'm kinda used to that now. I'm not saying I'm okay with Nintendo stealing the game for their shitty console but it seems to be a trend now. Ever since Square Enix did that with Kingdom Hearts (From PS2 to GBA to PS2 again to DS to PSP to 3DS. Wtf?), I lost all hope.

Well, my condolences to the fans of the series. But still, Nintendo, it's not a good enough reason to make abandon my current console and switch to the WiiU. Even if KH3 was released for the WiiU, I wouldn't switch. Ever since I bought the Wii and realized I only had like 5 good games to play, I've lost my faith on Nintendo.

 

[Gizmo1990]

I would like to play Bayonetta 2. I do not want to get a WiiU and I do not see that changeing as I hate motion controls.

But....Beyonetta and all WiiU games with the exception of co-op modes in games will be using the gamepad with no motion control needed.

OT. I gotta be honest, while it sickens me that these so called "hardcore" gamers are giving us real gamers a bad name, its been fun reading about it.

See I did not know that. However there is no way in hell I am buying a new console for one game and I have no interest in playing the same mario game I played 15 years ago with better graphics.

I also agree with you. It has been fun watching all the douche nozzels go bat shit crazy.

You've also got Rayman: Legends, ZombiU, Monster Hunter 3 Deluxe, an AWESOME version of Tekken, Bayonetta 2, Pikmin 3, Super Smash Bros and a confirmed Zelda game coming exclusively on the Wii U. Stop thinking that just because NSMB isn't really all that innovative that it's the only game you'll get on the system that's worth looking at. And really, 3D Marios are always very different from the last, compare Super Mario Sunshine and Super Mario Galaxy then tell me you're playing the same game. Sure, they released a sequel to Galaxy, but I can guarantee you the 3D Mario for the Wii U will be very different.

OH! You've also got a brand new IP from Platinum called "The Wonderful 101", an exclusive lego game that's looking to be really fun, a game called Tank Tank Tanks! which just looks bonkers, Scribblenauts: Unlimited which looks amazing and Nintendo Land which looks like this generation's Wii Sports.

It's cool. I stand corrected on the motion controls but I already looked at that list and Bayonetta is the only thing I would want to play.

 

[ToastiestZombie]

Snip

Damn... you must have a really limited taste in games then, you gotta admit that covers pretty much most genres, except third and first person shooters (ZombiU is first person, but it's survival horror, not a shooter). What exactly WOULD you want to play on it then?

 

[Gizmo1990]

They're just system sellers.
Wouldn't it make more sense to release games on all systems so you have the largest possible audience?

Just take solace in the knowledge that it's probably going to suck.

It's not the developer's fault that the game was saved by Nintendo...

And it's not Nintendo's fault that they don't want to settle for 1/3 of the sales.

you seem to have changed your post since you replyed to me, espacialy as that was not my quote , but in responce to what you said to me I know that many 360 and PS3 games will be ported over. Just one thing. I already have both a 360 and a PS3.

 

[Gizmo1990]

Snip

Damn... you must have a really limited taste in games then. What exactly WOULD you want to play on it then?

I mostly play RPGs, sandbox (Ass Creed, infamous, Batman), RTS, the odd FPS (not many through, not my thing). I tried monster hunter before and it did not do anything for me, I do not enjoy fighting games and I have never liked Zelda. I remember having some fun with smash bros and smash bros melee back in the day but brawl killed it for me.

I will not get one becuase the games do not appeal to me so far. That my change in the future. I am not one of the hater fools who will not buy it just because it is Nintendo.

 

[Wdbisl]

I honestly don't care I haven't played the original, so probably won't play the sequel. I do think it's stupid how people are complaining over it though. At least they are finally getting a sequel.