Danyal said:
Lol, are you trolling me? I'm pro-gay, mind you.
Archie Bunker wasn't a racist.
As long as you do not even have your basic rights, how can you start ranting about 'not being represented in games'?!
I see. So it is your assertion that one cannot be concerned for both?
Because I'm having trouble seeing another scenario where one precludes the other.
For the record, my state does offer same-sex rights, as do several surrounding states. I've been a gay rights advocate since before I could vote or drive. So...where's the problem?
Yeah well it's your right and stuff and Freedom Of Religion so go on, discriminate against gays.
This seem like a REAL issue to me, instead of *omzgf my minority isn't represented in games*.
Again, it's either or.
I'm a self-diagnosed Asperger, omg, make the Jarl of Dawnstar an autist!
Get back to me when you're actually diagnosed. Self-diagnoses aren't valid.
I'm not doing this, so I don't see any reason why developers should mandatory include your precious minority in games.
Yeah, you're not doing it, so nobody else should! How dare people think and act different from you!
I do love the fact that dismissing your ridiculousness is somehow making this about "my" precious minorities.
I'm trying to be a human, an equal human, not one of the 'minorities' or 'majorities'.
Oh look, specious reasoning!
That's the same reasoning, actually, our politicians are using to deny gay rights. It's because of arguments like this gays are still getting the shit beat out of them, denied jobs, etc.
Congrats.
Maybe you should strive to become an equal and not try to get attention and love because you belong to a minority.
Followed by convenient assumption of people's motives!
Yeah, you should misinterpret one word out of context
No, I took it in a different direction. that's neither of the above. Try again.
and then bask in self-misery.
Please don't make shit up.
Maybe you should play modern games. To appeal to the US/UK and other whiny countries that are too afraid to see what is in their own pants, we are banning sex, genitals and all references to it. Inflicting huge psychological trauma's, making people very happy and excited to be able to wave around with a purple dildo in SR3.
Hmmmm...Interesting, but still a made-up argument.
I haven't seen a lot of genitals, romances, sex, wives and husbands in Skyrim, BF3 or MW3. If you are able to choose your own partner, and you can't choose to be gay/lesbian, well, that's a good argument. I fully support the option to be gay in all games where you can choose your own partner. But games haven't even entered a stage where they can create a good heterosexual couple. Games are too much seen as child toys or something, I guess. Demanding good gay representation when there isn't even good heterosexual representation doesn't make sense.
False assertion that people are somehow demanding more than what is afforded majorities....Check.
Next you're going to say the people who support more black characters want cheat codes to make black people invincible. What? You wouldn't make that argument? It's ridiculous?
...Exactly. And so is the notion that people are somehow asking for that which is not afforded in those games.
And as long as their are real, as in REALLY REAL, injustices and legal discrimination against gays, I would focus my energy there.
That's your right. But then, the two are not mutually exclusive. If you think, for example, that I'm going to magically make America a nation where gays are represented, you don't understand the legal and political procedures here. If you think one cannot do both, or that the action of saying " I'd like more gays in video games" will somehow take away from gay rights, then you're unrealistic and ridiculous.
You, sir, could be fighting for rape victims right now, or fighting starvation and AIDS in Africa. Does your response to me mean that you don't care about those issues? No. Does it mean that you do not spend time involved in those issues? Not by itself. I would not presume to know what you do in the rest of your time.
But if I were to use your argument as a model, I would be lecturing you on your stances on the above.
And then, after long posts misrepresenting what gay gamers want, I would complain about being misrepresented and taken " out of context."
Maybe you should worry about this guy.
Why?
I'm curious as to why you think Rick Perry is someone I should worry about. It can't be because you think he stands any chance at winning the Republican nomination, as he's polling in single digits.
It seems a little more pressing, a little more discriminating, a little more fucking retarded than (homo)sexuality being misrepresented in games.
Yep. A man with no chance of election, whose words are falling on deaf ears and being outright mocked, is a pressing matter. Oh, wait.
Your own logic, your own posting style would indicate him a waste of time, and that we would be better suited worrying about other people. And yet here you are, preaching the opposite.
By the way, I was excited to play the Gay Tony DLC for GTA IV.
"Some of my best friends are black people."
So we've got a game with 'gay' in the title, do you do know any mainstream/popular game that has 'heterosexual' or 'straight' in the title?
Oh, snap, son! That proves that gays are actually MORE represented than straights!
...What? It doesn't?
Then what was your point, exactly? That one game mentions homosexuality in the title, and others don't mention straights so...Straights don't exist? Surely, you're not trying to argue that the presence of the word "gay" in a title following up a game where you play a guy who has strictly female romantic interests, whose cousin wants to see "beeg amereecan teetees" at every opportunity, somehow counterbalances or proves a positive.
Or really...Anything.