Excellent dedication you're displaying. Keep up the good work!OniaPL said:I don't understand why some people say "Dragon Age 2". There never was a sequel to DA:O... I really wish they would make one though.
Even Birth by Sleep? I'd think that all of the games are canon (except Kingdom Hearts VCAST, which is officially non-canon). It's just that some of them aren't quite as important as others.Fiad said:World of Warcraft for so many reasons.
And the Kingdom Hearts handheld games(Excluding Chain of Memories, though just barely)
That was my thought process too, though Human Revolution wasn't out yet. I had heard for years that it wasn't a good game, but figured what would be compared to the original Deus Ex? But for $2.50, surely even if it doesn't live up to the original I'll have to get my money's worth out of it right?Dfskelleton said:Hah, that's funny; the EXACT same thing happened to me.
I thought "I know it has a bad reputation, but I loved the original and I loved Human Revolution, and it's only $2.50. I'll give it a try."
Aurora Firestorm said:Invisible War doesn't count for this, because it's the "last" game in the series. Human Revolution was a prequel. You can always delete the last game and the rest will make sense.Spitfire said:The ironic thing is that, out of the 4 games that you mentioned, 3 of them could literally be deleted from history, and their respective series would still make perfect sense without them.Aurora Firestorm said:I've always seen threads like this as an excuse for people who don't like certain games in a series to claim that clearly they can modify the author's intent however they like. No, you really do have to accept that MGS2, Invisible War, Homeworld Cataclysm, ME3, and whatever else you don't like, are part of canon. They are.
Homeworld 2 was just as off the wall as Cataclysm. You could absolutely delete it. I mean, The Bentusi all died somewhere in the ether? WTF? The Turanic Raiders and the Taiidan just vanished? WTF?
The presence of Raiden in MGS4 is indeed problematic, but then again, he has about fuck all in common with the Raiden from MGS2, so you might as well run with it. But fair enough.MGS2 reappears in the form of Metal Gear Ray and Arsenal Gear in MGS4. Raiden also comes back, and he'd be utterly random if he hadn't shown up before.
The difference there is that Mass Effect 2 was specifically designed to lead into Mass Effect 3, whereas in the case of Invisible War, Cataclysm, and arguably, Metal Gear Solid 2, the previous entries in those series were standalone games, that had little to no requirement for any sort of sequel, and because of that, it's entirely possible to discount those particular games from the canon of their respective series.ME3 is just another ending game.
You beat me to it but I'm a bit more extreme in my view and have refused to play more than the demo. The original answered the unasked question concerning the origin of the Rebel Alliance's symbol. The second ruined any hope of The Force Unleashed being a good/great anthology series. I wouldn't even consider FU2 a what-if...just a big FU.Sean Hollyman said:Star Wars the Force Unleashed 2
I just think of it all as a 'what if'
Brotherhood doesn't rap up any story lines. Are you sure you aren't thinking about Revelations?Wolf In A Bear Suit said:Assassin's Creed Brotherhood. I just felt it was pointless and a mistake. The story moved nowhere and although it was nice that they wrapped up Ezio and Altiair's storylines I felt they didn't need an entire game for it. The only thing I liked about it was the badass trailer
Pretty much this. I never finished KotOR, (I know, I know...) but I played far enough to be really fucking pissed by one of its raid bosses.Fappy said:ToR. Thanks for destroying Kotor lore you jerks!
Interestingly enough, I like MGS2 and live in denial of MGS4. While MGS2 replaces Snake for a good portion, MGS4 kind of murdered his character for me. I was not a fan of the Old Snake thing they did. Also the gameplay and overall structure of 2 feel more MGS to me. I hated Raiden at first although now I have sort of a grudging respect for him. I actually own five copies of MGS2 though so I've played it enough that he can;t really bother me any more.Lord Quirk said:I'm gunna mention Metal Gear Solid 2. Whilst, from a gameplay standpoint, it was actually quite good and an evolution of MGS's sneaking, Raiden was simply annoying and unlikable in comparison to Solid Snake and the plot was a bit of a mess. At the end, I wasn't really sure what I achieved, and playing the chronological sequel, MGS 4, aside from featuring Raiden, Rose and Vamp, it barely referenced 2 at all. As such, I don?t count it any more. It's not a bad game, it's just not part of the MGS story.
That's what they were getting at?! They seriously messed up on that DLC. I replayed it recently and found that half the content you had to explore on your own to find, like the cargo hold and waste disposal areas. Yeah I'd erase that part from my mind too. The whole robot horse thing was creepy and interesting (eventhough I never found out exactly what they were planning).Knight Captain Kerr said:Mothership Zeta add-on for Fallout 3. No Mothership Zeta, aliens did not start the great war.