erttheking said:
Flailing Escapist said:
erttheking said:
So Assassin's Creed shouldn't recycle their progangonists...but Devil May Cry should?....
Oh my god, you are so right! All games should fall under the same formula and storytelling standards.
I don't know why it wasn't so obvious before. Face palm indeed!
All righty then, kindly elaborate for me, if you loved Ezio so much, why should he go and why should Dante stay? Kindly explain, I'm all ears.
Ezio was
alright. He started off as kind of annoying but he had a full character arc and AC:2 ended Ezio pretty well, I thought. They really didn't need to bring him back for 2 more games. The biggest problem is that Ubi could take the francise
anywhere in history but fell into the "release a new games every year" trap. Also there was a large improvement (gameplaywise) from AC to AC:2 but both the games since then have made little to no improvement.
And DMC... Fuck. I could go on for paragraphs about whats wrong with it. But I'm just going to leave these here instead>
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/104584-Devil-May-Cry-Reboot-Designed-to-Provoke-Fans
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/103685-Ninja-Theory-Defends-Dante-Redesign-UPDATED
Thats just a little of it
But for all I know DMC could be the best Devil May Cry yet. The thing is that Devil May Cry (except for 4 and arguably 2) games are some of the most fun I've ever had. While I play most games for the story, multiplayer or other entertaining features Devil May Cry was just straight up fun to play. I don't enjoy seeing a third party change almost all (the gameplay
does look better) of what made Devil May Cry such fun and I am damned opposed to it.
So is there a difference between Assassin's Creed and Devil May Cry?
Why yes, yes there is.