With no DRM I'm impressed. Dissapointing it's just a forum ban though (Steam forums are some of the worst and strictest anyway, so no big loss to any of the pirates).
I think i should point out the people who pirated The humble bundle, both of them.. And that was for charity..Rivers Wells said:That is fantastic. Whose pathetic enough to pirate a $10 game anyway?
True, but valve's probably concerned mainly with the casual pirate who torrents things every once in awhile. there really isn't anything you can do to the people who steal EVERYTHING unless you're willing to go to the trouble of suing them.sir.rutthed said:That's assuming they bought other stuff, rather than pirating everything or just having pirated Garry's Mod. I really don't see how this is going to solve anything long term; it's just a publicity stunt. A funny one, but a stunt nonetheless.
dagens24 said:I support this but do think that Steam should allow for some sort of review of cases where gamers claim they had a legit copy and were mistakenly banned.
Only if you have no idea what entrapment entails. It is impossible to "entrap" someone for a crime they've already committed. Entrapment is inciting someone to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed without your encouragement - in this case, for instance, giving someone directions on where and how to pirate Garry's Mod, along with assurances as to how hard it is to get caught and punished for doing so, and then busting them for following your instructions.Naturality said:Cool, but borderline entrapment...
This argument is completely useless. You can apply this to any and every game sold for profit, legitimizing all piracy, because "they sold out."moppop said:Meh. The game deserves to be pirated because Garry sold out.
To them I say:Not everyone is fan of Garry's Sting, naturally; some forum commenters have expressed concern that the "exploit" could be abused or mistakenly target innocent gamers
It's actually extremely easy to find out one's Steam ID, which is what worries me about this. Pirates can fuck off for all I care, but I don't want to get banned from the Steam forums because someone posted the error message with my Steam ID.Eclectic Dreck said:The person who generated the information had to willingly submit said information. From a technical standpoint that equates to perfect security while from a practical standpoint (as demonstrated with the reality of this case) such a mechanism is clearly open for exploit. For example, one could simply ask for it.Covarr said:How easy is it to obtain this ID number? My chief concern is that if someone figures out a way to get SOMEONE ELSE's number, they could fake the message and get that person banned. For example, I don't own Garry's Mod (yet), so if somebody pretended to be me on the Garry's Mod forums, and claimed to have the error message along with my ID, *I* could get in trouble for it.
This strikes me as a very dangerous form of antipiracy.
P.S. Thanks
Pretty sure he was being sarcastic.Cobaltmotari said:"The sheer unfairness of not being allowed to play a game they didn't pay for"
In the words of the ever-quotable yahtzee, "That's not logic!"
3 users were affected with the onscreen error message that were legit. But that's been resolved and won't happen again according to the official blog. (this was before the banhammering during the test phase)Gudrests said:The thing is, its in the coding to where if its not pirated...they wont have the problem. and you can only get it on steam sooo lol. I guess If you contact them and you did buy it...they have a record of it right there so they would be fine with giving you your account back (and knowing valve probably 5 games with it) but still...sounds like a rare case. GOOD JOB BIG GUY..YOU SIR ARE QUITE THE SMARTdagens24 said:I support this but do think that Steam should allow for some sort of review of cases where gamers claim they had a legit copy and were mistakenly banned.
true but it was still worth it for the gigglessir.rutthed said:My question is what exactly is stopping these guys from pirating it again? They obviously have no compunctions against it.