No big deal; it happens. (I vaguely remembered that character, but you confused me a bit when you called her "Debbie." Her name is actually Betty.)Urgh76 said:Yeah, and I just found out that she actually had a husband O>O
So my bad XD
No big deal; it happens. (I vaguely remembered that character, but you confused me a bit when you called her "Debbie." Her name is actually Betty.)Urgh76 said:Yeah, and I just found out that she actually had a husband O>O
So my bad XD
I think what he meant by normal is actually statistically normal rather than a judgmental "normal" of one's opinion.Bara_no_Hime said:You don't need to explain anything about sex - explain about love.Kipohippo said:I think you guys are over shooting this. Being straight is biologically normal. Should we not present that as a norm? Yes, homosexuality is a part of life, but we dont need to stuff it into entertainment for the hell of it. Especially a kid's show. If a kid is going to be gay, let them find that out for themselves instead of doing it because this character from this show is gay.
Edit: Plus, i dont want to have to explain ANYTHING about sex to my children. Keep it simple.
Also...
Being straight is biologically normal? Um, no. Homosexuality exists all throughout nature. Homosexuality is as biologically "normal" as heterosexuality.
Please don't make such ignorant and offensive statements.
Huh. I could have sworn I remembered Steve calling her a boy. I apologize for my mistake- I need time to process this new information.shedra said:http://www.nickjr.com/blues-clues/about-blues-clues/blues-clues-characters.htmlSuperMse said:Magenta's a boy. It's stated numerous times in the show. Not many people realize this, but it's true. I guess the creators wanted to subvert gender roles- nifty.shedra said:In Doctor Who, (Which is a show I could consider a family/kids show) there have been two homosexual characters that I know of. And it doesn't matter that they are. It hardly ever comes up. Only in passing conversation.
As far as exposing homosexuality to smaller children.
Well,
(both girls)
They don't form a lack of acceptance for alternative lifestyles until later.
Read Magenta's article.
erm regards to your bestiality:Canid117 said:Pedophilia has a negative psychological impact on the younger party. Bestiality isn't illegal but it is looked down upon by society due to a lack of any possibility of an emotional relationship and necrophilia is seen as violating the wishes of the deceased.LCP said:Gay relationships can't have kids, simple.Farseer Lolotea said:So what's your justification for thinking that it has to be one or the other, as opposed to merely being more akin to laterality?LCP said:I have trouble believing it's not a choice... Just me... Because if it's not a choice it's a defect...
I hate bringing this part up, but I'm stubborn as hell, what is the huge difference in sexual orientations that pedophilia, bestiality, or necrophilia (and probably more -ilias) can't be considered a valid option/choice/something? I don't see a huge jump from them to gay, if you subtract doing damage. Why shouldn't some things be considered acceptable while others aren't. I choose not to vouch for any of them. Gay just seems to be the borderland of the sexual orientations(probably not using the right word)
I hope it makes sense, i almost never do, partly blame my English..
A can of worms I'd GLADLY tear open, seeing as I've dabbled with prostitution myself.Farseer Lolotea said:Which doesn't necessarily mean that it's innately "wrong." But that's still another can of worms.LCP said:Because 2 adults consent to something it should be considered ok? I'm pretty sure prostitution consists of 2 consenting adults, yet it's frowned upon, and illegal in some countries.
Again, no. You see people in these shows that have those crushes? Having a character have a crush on another addresses this as natural. Also apparently in Kim Possible, one of the characters has two moms and this is not called in the show as being weird.KAPTAINmORGANnWo4life said:Umm...Why do children's cartoons need to address sexuality in the first place? How can a character on a show where you can't even say the word "sex" have a sexual orientation? Do they act camp? If so, then they're not an accurate representation of a homosexual, if not, I can't see how you could even notice this.
Certainly. Get back to me when you're feeling better.SuperMse said:Huh. I could have sworn I remembered Steve calling her a boy. I apologize for my mistake- I need time to process this new information.shedra said:http://www.nickjr.com/blues-clues/about-blues-clues/blues-clues-characters.htmlSuperMse said:Magenta's a boy. It's stated numerous times in the show. Not many people realize this, but it's true. I guess the creators wanted to subvert gender roles- nifty.shedra said:In Doctor Who, (Which is a show I could consider a family/kids show) there have been two homosexual characters that I know of. And it doesn't matter that they are. It hardly ever comes up. Only in passing conversation.
As far as exposing homosexuality to smaller children.
Well,
(both girls)
They don't form a lack of acceptance for alternative lifestyles until later.
Read Magenta's article.
Well looks like I was wrong about the legal issue. Still not the point of the post though.powell86 said:erm regards to your bestiality:Canid117 said:Pedophilia has a negative psychological impact on the younger party. Bestiality isn't illegal but it is looked down upon by society due to a lack of any possibility of an emotional relationship and necrophilia is seen as violating the wishes of the deceased.LCP said:Gay relationships can't have kids, simple.Farseer Lolotea said:So what's your justification for thinking that it has to be one or the other, as opposed to merely being more akin to laterality?LCP said:I have trouble believing it's not a choice... Just me... Because if it's not a choice it's a defect...
I hate bringing this part up, but I'm stubborn as hell, what is the huge difference in sexual orientations that pedophilia, bestiality, or necrophilia (and probably more -ilias) can't be considered a valid option/choice/something? I don't see a huge jump from them to gay, if you subtract doing damage. Why shouldn't some things be considered acceptable while others aren't. I choose not to vouch for any of them. Gay just seems to be the borderland of the sexual orientations(probably not using the right word)
I hope it makes sense, i almost never do, partly blame my English..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law#National_laws
haha yeah, thats why i didn't say anything much. it's just a fyi. cuz your argument is still valid with or without the bestiality portion. But I would prefer your argument not made weaker due to misinformation.Canid117 said:Well looks like I was wrong about the legal issue. Still not the point of the post though.