That's exactly what I was thinking.IamQ said:So if Duke Nukem is an overy masculine person, will the female constrast, be extremly feminine?
You know, that's just crazy enough to work. The aliens could have their Duchess Nukem fem-pimp who appears at the end for a clash of morals and an epic fight with Duke.Zaik said:I was just talking yesterday about how a Duchess Nukem who did the exact same things as Duke Nukem does(except obviously with men instead of how Duke handles women) would be received entirely differently, and how that was more or less proof that it wasn't misogynistic.
Crazy.
IamQ said:So if Duke Nukem is an overy masculine person, will the female constrast, be extremly feminine?
Yes, but is she an over-the-top overexaggeration of all things feminine? As far as I remember her sexuality was never a factor and she was basically a video game version of Kill Bill's Beatrix. Duke Nukem is, however, the epitome of all things that have ever been considered masculine.Urich Vannon said:Nanananananah you guys are all missing it... It's RUBY from WET!! She drinks, smokes, and kicks ass; and has guns, a sword, and a foul-mouth!!
See, that I'm totally fine with. If Duke is just shown as an A-grade ass toward everyone and everything then all is well. It'd be nice to see a game about someone who is essentially Johnny Bravo where the game mocks and laughs at the days of old through the character.conflictofinterests said:That depends on your definition of misogynist, I suppose. Is one a misogynist if one simply has little or no respect for women, or if one has little or no respect for women IN PARTICULAR. I think this Gearbox guy has a good point. Duke has little or no respect for ANYONE that isn't him, and about half of the people that are not him also happen to be women. I might characterize Duke as simply a douche, as opposed to strictly a misogynist.MacGuges said:Yeah, I understand. That is also how I view the Grand Theft Auto games. But nobody from Rockstar appeared to defend the amoral criminality of their protagonists, so I've become concerned that Gearbox and the game's fans appear to want to identify with Duke, in fact. Pitchfork has actually said that Duke is not misogynist, which is being deliberately obtuse, IMHO.conflictofinterests said:Meh. I think it boils down to the fact that Duke IS a joke, and as far as I have seen, it's easy to be ok with a man being a joke, and nigh impossible to be ok with a woman being a joke. Make of that what you will.MacGuges said:Yeah, I'm getting that impression too, that the game won't be an adventure featuring a sexist hero but a sexist fantasy for blinkered guys. Half of this forum has been about how awesome their sexy girl Nukem would be, and the other half about how the awful feminists would never appreciate their good intentions.AngloDoom said:...So it's not sexist because, in the end, he whisks the women off their feet from horseback and rides into the sunset?Tom Goldman said:"He is ego-centric and everything in his world revolves around him," he continued. "And women can offer him something different than men can. So if, to Duke, women are less than him, it's not because they're women, it's just because they're not him."
Pitchford points out how Duke actually puts himself "at great risk" to make sure women are safe, which is the premise of Duke Nukem Forever.
If Duke was shown being an ass, and the other characters treating him like he was an ass, I'd be all for that. If he saved a woman's life, hinted he wanted her to give him 'something' because he saved her, and she turned around and call called him an ass and stormed off, then I'd happily say the game is mocking Duke and that's all fine.
However, I'm pretty sure the formula will go: Woman in danger, Duke saves women, woman thanks Duke by getting on her knees, Duke finds another women in danger, Duke saves women, etc, etc.
EDIT: I think the game is more told from the point of view of Duke, and whatever fantasy world his perverted little mind lives in. Yeah, what AngloDoom said would be very applicable if this were "reality" in the game world, where people aren't cardboard cut-outs and nondescript cannon-fodder, but as it stands, what I get from it is you're playing as a mildly deranged man witnessing the world as that mildly deranged man might.
EDIT: Going by the "someone is prejudiced because they simply have little or no respect for x group of people," Duke is also almost every flavor of racist, agist, and sexuality-ist (is there a better word for this?) under the sun, as well as possessing countless other prejudices which would bar him from EVER getting federal funding were he an institution.
GTA has never been a parody from what I can tell. Given it's the one to copy of the 'rampant criminal' genre.evilthecat said:Yeah.. I call this missing the point. Or rather deflecting criticism by throwing the media a stick and running away.
Egoism would not necessitate putting women in positions where they have to be rescued and/or smacked, masculinity does that. Saying 'Duke is an egotistical man, there could be a game about an egotistical woman!' is like saying 'I have spray painted a swastika on this wall, but you could spray paint a maltese cross!'
Yes, so? We weren't talking about some fictional game which doesn't exist, Randy. We were talking about your game which does exist and which does contain content which some people quite justifiably find objectionable. As you've said yourself, male egotism is different. We live in a world where women get physically and sexually abused by 'egotistical men' to a staggeringly high degree and the reverse is not true.
There's one very simple way out of this and the complete reluctance to take it is mind boggling and a little disturbing. Just say 'it's a parody'. How the fuck do you think GTA got away with it? Of course, if the game isn't a parody and it's been played dead serious then don't be surprised if that shit doesn't fly in the 21st century. It's a tradeoff.
Shouldn't that in itself tell you something..Keirgo said:Duke is an exageration of many traits and isn't meant to be taken seriously as a way to live (except maybe for how to use a jetpack) and the support for a brash, equally out of her mind, dominant female is pretty strong here it seems.
What gave away his lack of role model potential, was it the fact that he's an emotionally dead and borderline suicidal wreck who covers it up with humour, innuendo and hedonism?Keirgo said:Do I think Zeveran of Dragon Age is a good role model? No. Would I have happily played a game about him and wooed my way through some very handsom men. Totally.
But nobody complaints. There's no huge protests from male rights organizations going all "he is a disgrace for our self-image blablabla". Just recently there was all this rage in the media about some advertising campaign for a shoe brand, featuring a hot woman dressed in a pair of shoes and nothing more. Things like "giving a false portrayal of the female body" and "making the female body a product for sale".cainx10a said:Because you know, Duke, Marcus and Kratos is what every real man is supposed to look like. >__<SirBryghtside said:I guess so, and people pointed out that she was oversexualised.cainx10a said:Ain't Bayonetta the female Duke Nukem?
*looks at picture of Duke*
Um... why is it that no one's complained about Duke being oversexualised?