Retrograde said:
StewShearer said:
That said, many women who are genuinely geeks tend to get caught up in the emergent assumption that women who profess a love of nerdy things must be faking it. There exists, for many, an unspoken litmus test that you have to pass to count as a nerd. Being a woman is, for some, seen as a disqualification. In essence, while some are truly (and stupidly) angered by the idea of a woman pretending to be a geek for attention, others act as though women being nerdy at all is something absurd
Where have you seen this thing that exists actually perpetrated?
What was the guys name that did this crap when you saw it in your life?
When you asked him what he was angry about what did he say?
What was the questions on this litmus test?
How are we to challenge these things without all the juicy deets?
It's not that I don't think you're in the same camp as everybody else that buys that line in that this is a thing you've never actually witnessed happen (but that everyone 'knows' 'happens' 'all the time')... Actually, I lied, that's exactly what I think. But to be fair to the well meaning people that perpetuate this stuff, nobody has tried to come up with some anecdotal crap, they're all earnestly straight forward in a 'oh yeah...' kind of way that they've never seen anything resembling what they're talking about.
When I was still a little girl in college, I decided to attend a tournament for a new fighting game that had come out. My husband(boyfriend then) and I signed up and then waited about 30 minutes for the bracket to be posted. We were really excited; turn out was really good for a local tournament: 70ish people! Then the bracket went up...
I was placed in the girlfriend bracket(that was it's actual name), which was located in the losers bracket. When I talked to the tournament organizer, he ignored me. Sad part is after winning the girlfriend bracket, my next five or so rounds were against people that should have gone out in round two and my first opponent was really good. She and I went right down to the wire, but she was eliminated in the first round(and since we started in losers, she was out.) I three stocked the first guy I played against without taking any damage and he made it to round 4.
Crap my husband was already better than me at that game, he didn't need a handicap. So there is your example, though I can't really give names since it was a collective. Think the organizer was a John. (Which helps so much, I know.)
OT: People lie...it's not gender specific. So I've never seen the point of thinking someone has a lack of integrity as they are walking up to me. I'd like to be judged on merit in competition and I don't rate people in normal conversation. In other words I don't test people while talking to them. Having drastically different views and likes can make for great conversation.
As for the, I think someone used the term cam-whores, I adore them. Most of them are fairly easy on the eyes, no matter which gender they are, but more importantly, the comments are pure gold. I once saw a guy donate $150 for a hello from the girl streaming. I'm chuckling thinking about it. To me, that man isn't a victim, he made a mistake and a very stupid one. If I went to a bar, got drunk and had sex with a guy, I would have made a mistake. I would have a lot of re-accessing of my life to do, just like the $150 hello man does. You live, you learn, and then you buy Loves(and hopefully you don't distrust an entire group of people based off just a few members.)
You know what, I'd even go so far as to defend the "fakers." A wise not-horse once said, "It is the actions which matter, not the Name it was done for." The "fakers" might be interested for different reasons than me but we are both still interested. They might know less than me about a given subject, but that just leaves them room to do some tangential learning. I know I've been against trying or doing something, only to discover I love it after going through the motions a bit.