Yeah, because people weren't playing tag or catch since the freaking Stone Age. Games existed before the Atari 2600, kids.JesterRaiin said:Multiplayer.Antonsson said. "The first games were designed as multiplayer experiences,
Right.
Riiiiiiiiiiiight.
My thoughts exactly.DustyDrB said:Everyone, join me in saying this: "Who?"
Those games also didn't use a computer are you gonna argue video games are just a fad? The guys whole argument is flawed, how can anyone take the notion of how it started as the only way it should stay seriously?BiscuitWheels said:Yeah, because people weren't playing tag or catch since the freaking Stone Age. Games existed before the Atari 2600, kids.JesterRaiin said:Multiplayer.Antonsson said. "The first games were designed as multiplayer experiences,
Right.
Riiiiiiiiiiiight.
The amount of vitriol in this thread is astounding. And, for the most part, what this dude said was true. Games where originally invented as a social experience. Single player games are really just you playing against the computer instead of another human player out of necessity.
You mean the company that is taking their historically single player franchise and making an MMO out of it?Bernzz said:Yeah okay. Have fun convincing Bethesda that single player is a gimmick and nothing more.
More often than not, it represents another person or persons to play against.webepoop said:I think he might have a point, even if he doesn't realize it. Think about it, all AI is is another person that has been made to play with. Almost every single player game has some sort of AI or something that represents another person to play with.