i would like to take this moment to make a sound we all made at this...ahem....PFFFFFFFHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.....yes we all loled at MW2 failure.
Nouw said:that's all fine and good. after you finish Halo Reach in 6 or 8 hours let me barrow it so I can be proven rightMikeyfell said:Don't judge a book by it's cover isn't literal (although it is most of the time. I don't blame you) It means don't judge something by looking at it, judge it by actually reading/watching/playing etc.Nouw said:Snipped
or after you finish Reach in 18 to 25 hours let me barrow it so I can be proven wrong
(hypothetically of course. the times are the thing you should look at, I don't expect you to let me barrow your game)
I'm completely willing to give Halo Reach a chance. that chance isn't worth $60 to me
I used to be in this boat. I pre ordered Halo 3gof22 said:Just because many people like the Halo franchise does not mean you can go around and insult them. What is the big deal if 1.9 million people pre-ordered it? Many of those 1.9 million people could like Mass Effect, Dragon Age, and/or the Half-Life series. Why judge people just based on one game they pre-order?Mikeyfell said:fine, ignore me, spend $60 on a game that you already own, then preorder Halo Reach 2, and Halo Reach 3. Never mind that you're being milked with new box art and slight graphical upgradesgodofallu said:Judging from your grammar, punctuation, and point; I can only assume that you should be ignored.Mikeyfell said:wow I didn't know there were only 1.9 million complete tools out there
I guess everyone else is just going to play Halo 3 again and call it a day
good on you everyone but the 1.9 million retards out there
OP: Yes Halo Reach has set a new bar for videogame releases everywhere.
On Topic: That is a pretty impressive number. With this being Bungie's last Halo game I am not surprised there were many pre-orders.
You sir, are not very nice. Lucky for me, I already knew what I was being linked to, but it still scared me a little. You should be ashamed of yourself!Sassafrass said:Pretty impressive but I'm sure everyone saw it coming, right? [http://kuvaton.com/kuvei/mindfuck.gif] Mehehehehe~~~ Love that .gif
I mean, Forge World looks awesome, Halo, regardless whether you love it or hate it, has always had a massive fan base and with this being Bungie's last Halo game, it's gonna get snapped up pretty quickly.
Hahaha, this!Cynical skeptic said:Heh, new halo game vs new call of duty game.
Kinda like watching two drunk, retarded, homeless quadriplegics try to fight to the death without wheelchairs.
if Halo dies that is just fine with me... it's not going toCeltic_Kerr said:You do realize that bungie and Microsoft are done right? Dude Reach falls... It's in the book. Everyone knows it. You can't MAKE a Reach 2 or 3.Mikeyfell said:fine, ignore me, spend $60 on a game that you already own, then preorder Halo Reach 2, and Halo Reach 3. Never mind that you're being milked with new box art and slight graphical upgradesgodofallu said:Judging from your grammar, punctuation, and point; I can only assume that you should be ignored.Mikeyfell said:wow I didn't know there were only 1.9 million complete tools out there
I guess everyone else is just going to play Halo 3 again and call it a day
good on you everyone but the 1.9 million retards out there
OP: Yes Halo Reach has set a new bar for videogame releases everywhere.
Besides, Bungie and Microsoft are parting ways.
But it's good to know that you THINK you have your information down pat.
You don't understand, they are incapable of making a reach 2. The book was about the war and how Reach fell, basically winning the war for the convnant. Check the review on game trailers. One thing about this game is that you KNOW reach will fall no matter what you do. They can't make any new games. Besides, without Bingie's support, do you really think people will buy Halo expecting it to be good?Mikeyfell said:if Halo dies that is just fine with me... it's not going toCeltic_Kerr said:You do realize that bungie and Microsoft are done right? Dude Reach falls... It's in the book. Everyone knows it. You can't MAKE a Reach 2 or 3.Mikeyfell said:fine, ignore me, spend $60 on a game that you already own, then preorder Halo Reach 2, and Halo Reach 3. Never mind that you're being milked with new box art and slight graphical upgradesgodofallu said:Judging from your grammar, punctuation, and point; I can only assume that you should be ignored.Mikeyfell said:wow I didn't know there were only 1.9 million complete tools out there
I guess everyone else is just going to play Halo 3 again and call it a day
good on you everyone but the 1.9 million retards out there
OP: Yes Halo Reach has set a new bar for videogame releases everywhere.
Besides, Bungie and Microsoft are parting ways.
But it's good to know that you THINK you have your information down pat.
Microsoft doesn't care about your books, or about Bungie, they care about your money
they'll find some new ring or new alien to keep it going forever
and when reach 2 does come out it will sell just like all the rest
As much as I'd hate to admit it, this is one of the most true statements I've known. I'm just glad that Microsoft and Bungie departed. No more Halo games, no more beating the dead horsepoiumty said:How to win @ advertising:
- grab thing
- write Halo on it
Halo: Reach was a world release and was actually out today. So stop trolling and go do something more meaningful with your time.Mikeyfell said:Halo Reach isn't out yet, unless you're in New York
You do realize that bungie and Microsoft are done right? Dude Reach falls... It's in the book. Everyone knows it. You can't MAKE a Reach 2 or 3.Celtic_Kerr said:snip
how can you agree with this and not what I said captain double standardCeltic_Kerr said:As much as I'd hate to admit it, this is one of the most true statements I've known. I'm just glad that Microsoft and Bungie departed. No more Halo games, no more beating the dead horsepoiumty said:How to win @ advertising:
- grab thing
- write Halo on it
you do know when I posted that right? before midnight...Kungfu_Teddybear said:Halo: Reach was a world release and was actually out today. So stop trolling and go do something more meaningful with your time.Mikeyfell said:Halo Reach isn't out yet, unless you're in New York
Mikeyfell said:-snipping for space-
Of course it could beat MW2 it's an exclusive to the system with a similar content/fanbase while MW2 was multiplatfrom.Saucycardog said:http://www.vgchartz.com/preorders.php
Here's MW2 on the same date http://www.vgchartz.com/preorders.php?date=40125
Halo Reach is quite the beast.
I disagree, I don't think Microsoft even cares about their own integrity. or fan baseCeltic_Kerr said:Mikeyfell said:-snipping for space-
I agreed with he other poster because yes, if you put halo's name on something, you will make money. However, as to whether or not Microsoft will risk making dissapointing games without Bungie's support, risking their fanbase, I don't think they would.
I think you'd taken it a little far out of proportion. I can understand that Microsoft might WANT to release 5,000,000 games with Reach's name on it, but would they risk their integrity and attempt to make more? No.
Even if they did: After the first or second game people would know it was shit, they'd stop buying, and Microsoft would go dead quiet. People wouldn't buy the original Halos anymore because of how much of a cop out and sell out Microsoft made it. Pure business: If you don't have your main partner, one of the reasons your product have been so... Let's say innovative (for arguments sake), then you don't try to make new products based on what you and that partner had. Why? Because you know it'll fail.
Again, as much as Microsoft doesn't care if they beat the franchise dead, they don't care if Halo'sname no loniger mean anything. However, they won't risk if because they know that they'll fail
If you like Halo, and you're only going on past experiance, why are you bashing so hard? Give it a try before you call people tools and such. And yes, Microsoft can buy all their perfect little reviews, but would you listen to IGN (they did rate the game 10), or one of the escapists for word on a good game? We know that perfect reviews are impossible. IGN even said "If you want a good story, this isn't for you" so how did it become PERFECT?Mikeyfell said:I disagree, I don't think Microsoft even cares about their own integrity. or fan baseCeltic_Kerr said:Mikeyfell said:-snipping for space-
I agreed with he other poster because yes, if you put halo's name on something, you will make money. However, as to whether or not Microsoft will risk making dissapointing games without Bungie's support, risking their fanbase, I don't think they would.
I think you'd taken it a little far out of proportion. I can understand that Microsoft might WANT to release 5,000,000 games with Reach's name on it, but would they risk their integrity and attempt to make more? No.
Even if they did: After the first or second game people would know it was shit, they'd stop buying, and Microsoft would go dead quiet. People wouldn't buy the original Halos anymore because of how much of a cop out and sell out Microsoft made it. Pure business: If you don't have your main partner, one of the reasons your product have been so... Let's say innovative (for arguments sake), then you don't try to make new products based on what you and that partner had. Why? Because you know it'll fail.
Again, as much as Microsoft doesn't care if they beat the franchise dead, they don't care if Halo'sname no loniger mean anything. However, they won't risk if because they know that they'll fail
and there's nothing stopping them from buying a couple perfect 10 reviews for Reach 2
so it'll sell
but we'll just have to wait and see
for the record I don't hate Halo I think it's the most fun of all the crappy FPS's out there
and I want Reach to be good, I really do. Experience has taught me that FPS sequels are bad.
there really isn't a reason for Reach to be any better than Halo 3, besides the jetpacks.Celtic_Kerr said:If you like Halo, and you're only going on past experiance, why are you bashing so hard? Give it a try before you call people tools and such. And yes, Microsoft can buy all their perfect little reviews, but would you listen to IGN (they did rate the game 10), or one of the escapists for word on a good game? We know that perfect reviews are impossible. IGN even said "If you want a good story, this isn't for you" so how did it become PERFECT?Mikeyfell said:I disagree, I don't think Microsoft even cares about their own integrity. or fan baseCeltic_Kerr said:Mikeyfell said:-snipping for space-
I agreed with he other poster because yes, if you put halo's name on something, you will make money. However, as to whether or not Microsoft will risk making dissapointing games without Bungie's support, risking their fanbase, I don't think they would.
I think you'd taken it a little far out of proportion. I can understand that Microsoft might WANT to release 5,000,000 games with Reach's name on it, but would they risk their integrity and attempt to make more? No.
Even if they did: After the first or second game people would know it was shit, they'd stop buying, and Microsoft would go dead quiet. People wouldn't buy the original Halos anymore because of how much of a cop out and sell out Microsoft made it. Pure business: If you don't have your main partner, one of the reasons your product have been so... Let's say innovative (for arguments sake), then you don't try to make new products based on what you and that partner had. Why? Because you know it'll fail.
Again, as much as Microsoft doesn't care if they beat the franchise dead, they don't care if Halo'sname no loniger mean anything. However, they won't risk if because they know that they'll fail
and there's nothing stopping them from buying a couple perfect 10 reviews for Reach 2
so it'll sell
but we'll just have to wait and see
for the record I don't hate Halo I think it's the most fun of all the crappy FPS's out there
and I want Reach to be good, I really do. Experience has taught me that FPS sequels are bad.
Consumers listen more to consumers than "professional" reviewers. Microsoft HAS to care about its integrity. If they blow that, no one ever buys their games again.
Your passive agressive jab at me is noted. Halo is boring. Kill this guy, Kill that guy, Repeat.Vanguard_Ex said:Reach is far from the same game. If this is the same game then I don't know what different is.ToonLink said:Quality? Dont make me laugh. Halo is the same game every single time.Talon Julius said:Beautiful. Finally something of quality is being accepted by the masses. Thank god for Bungie.
If anyone is being a sheep and following the "masses" its anyone who's bought a Halo game.
Halo can go sodomize itself with a rusty pitchfork.
Besides, not nearly as much as fucking Zelda or Mario.
Legend of Zelda, Mario, Gears of War, Elder Scrolls, Metroid, need I go on that are basically the same games time after time? If its a winning formula why try and reinvent the wheel? Halo: Combat Evolved DEFINED what a console shooter was. Its not following the masses if you enjoy a console shooter.ToonLink said:Quality? Dont make me laugh. Halo is the same game every single time.Talon Julius said:Beautiful. Finally something of quality is being accepted by the masses. Thank god for Bungie.
If anyone is being a sheep and following the "masses" its anyone who's bought a Halo game.
Halo can go sodomize itself with a rusty pitchfork.