Mr Somewhere said:
Oh, I'm not going to debate the quality of Ender's Game, but, that man. It's at the stage where he has become a parody of himself. I simply can no longer separate the work and the person. A very similar thing happened with the creator of Earthworm Jim; Doug TenNapel. I read a few of his comics, really enjoyed them, though, I found they were occasionally plagued by some negligible philosophies. Then, I discovered the kinds of things TenNapel believed. I can no longer enjoy his work.
Now, I'm not going to claim to be a conservative (although I might qualify in Europe), but I respect several of 'em highly - P.J. O'Rourke and George Will to name a few. But his conservatism seems to be of the drastic "let's round 'em up if they don't agree" variety. And it's practically impossible to enjoy his later work, not because he has those views, but that
he drags them into his writing. And it's kind of upsetting for a guy who's obviously fairly brilliant in a technical aspect.
And yeah, I know, people write what they believe, but soapboxing detracts from the flow of fiction. Off the top of my head, I can think of two accomplished writers in the horror field guilty of the same thing: Stephen King (I tend to agree with the views, but please!), and Dean Koontz (good Lord! What has happened to you? Was Intensity a fluke?)