blindthrall said:
KillerMidget said:
Trolls, racists, homophobes and advertisers (especially ones from Ansblog) are what I report.
I ignore personal insults, because they aren't directed at me, and if they were I'd still ignore them, unless they were trollish, racist, homophobic or advertising something of course.
Trolls, racists, and homophobes are all subjective. Even in an obvious case, it's still just an opinion. I know the rules might say otherwise, but I don't feel right censoring someone else's opinion. Not that I'm saying you're wrong to do so, that's just me personally.
Well, I admit some people are accused of being... I think the phrase was "well-disguised trolls", and I'd assume they are more honest opinion types with perhaps just a way of writing that may provoke some, or even just if their opinion is a minority one. I hope that wasn't a Warren Harding sentence there.
I'm fairly certain though if you have someone who comes on to post: "LOL Halo sux, CoD iis best. u r all Halo fags", then censorship only helps my eyes (as I can't read grammatically destroyed sentences very well).
I like it when opinions are more civilised. Most people I know with inflammatory opinions keep it cool.
Homophobes and racists can quite easily conceal the fact they are homophobic or racist. Spouting hate speech which they know is going to rile everyone up is just
asking for a banning.
I understand your opinion though on the matter.
It's fun to be civilised about things. Now I feel the urge to buy a top hat.