Heavy Rain Dev Calls L.A. Noire's MotionScan Tech a "Dead End"

ninja51

New member
Mar 28, 2010
342
0
0
Of COURSE its not as good. Its ABSOLUTLY not like hes just trying to get publicity to his game and talk it up. Its NOT like this technology is better than what he has
 

Sutter Cane

New member
Jun 27, 2010
534
0
0
IMHO cage has a point where he says that capturing only face movements and capturing face AND body movements can make a world of a difference. As for whether his tech will actually be better, we'll just have to wait and see. Also did some of you miss the part where he said that LA Noir looked good? He just raised concerns that the standard set by LA noir may be abut the best that can be done with that particular method.
 

ImprovizoR

New member
Dec 6, 2009
1,952
0
0
If their next game is like heavy rain no one will give a shit how it look like. That wasn't even a game.
 

A Pious Cultist

New member
Jul 4, 2009
1,103
0
0
He's right. On a frame-by-frame basis LA Noir characters look genuinely really ugly. You can't have normal mapping, or reflectivity (or as stated, scripted eye directions) for the yes, or 3D hair. Everything is just a video projected onto a deforming mesh by the looks of it. You get amazing animation but it is a dead end. They need to be able to have meshes and texturing that look up like you'd expect from other games.
 

MarsProbe

Circuitboard Seahorse
Dec 13, 2008
2,372
0
0
jhlip said:
The Dev seems kind of arrogant if you ask me.
My thoughts exactly. Maybe when this guy manages to make a statement without sounding like a self-important twat, I may listen to him. Until that day though, I'm not paying attention.
 

Jonesy911

New member
Jul 6, 2009
789
0
0
Lol, Heavy Rain developers talking innovation. Heavy Rain has probably the worst storyline I've seen in a game. The predictability was insane and the characters were such cardboard cut-out stereotypes (Beat cop, whore with a heart etc.) that it made the game insufferable. Also you had to hold down R2 to walk and change directions with a thumbstick? What the fuck, I think quantic dreams mistook retardation for innovation with that one.
 

Yossarian1507

New member
Jan 20, 2010
681
0
0
Sylocat said:
I love how any topic that even mentions Quantic Dream immediately turns into a rant thread about how much Heavy Rain sucked.

David Cage is a dick, sure (although, having read his personal blog archives, I think he might actually be suffering from some severe mental ailments), but what did he say here that was false? Rockstar's mocap tech is good, and the game it made looks good (both of which he freely admits), but it IS incredibly expensive and it ISN'T versatile.

Yeah, pots and kettles and all, but still, this is bordering on ad hominem attacks.
This. Thousand times this.

I love Heavy Rain's graphics. I love Heavy Rain as a whole game (yes, a game. Battle sequences are solved with QTE's sure, but the rest is a game, just the interface is very different from others. What exactly makes 'push the right analog stick in a certain way to do certain action' less a game mechanic than 'press F to use', or 'left click to interact'?). It's my all time favorite.

Call me a fanboy, but I agree with him. L.A. Noire's facial animations are looking great (and Cage admits that), but even trailers can show you what he is talking about. I'm ultra hyped about L.A. Noire, because I love detective stories, and graphics, setting, EVERYTHING look damn fine so far... But if there's one studio that can 'one up' this level of graphics and animations - it's Quantic Dream... And maybe Crytek if they'll stop making things look too shiny.
 

Jonesy911

New member
Jul 6, 2009
789
0
0
The Youth Counselor said:
Stop twisting Gage's words. He's not shit talking, but bringing up a real concern. It's just a shame he's a professional and not entitled to the privilege to make simple comments that we all enjoy.

It's true, if you look at L.A. Noire's MotionScan technology, the actors are confined to a small sphere of stationary cameras and have to sit stiffly without actual real life interactions. That's not natural, and limits the acting and animation potential.

Compare that to say Jame's Cameron's Avatar or Resident Evil 5 where cameras were attached to the actor's heads and shooting their faces and had them actually move around and interact. That makes a load of difference.

Still this great motion capture technology still can't hold if your characters aren't believable. Naughty Dog, VALVe, and Pixar animate mostly by hand. No motion capture just, looking at references and moving sliders! And look where that has taken them.
Whoa whoa wait a second, "Naughty Dog, VALVe, and Pixar animate mostly by hand. No motion capture just, looking at references and moving sliders!". I don't know about the other two but I'm like 100% sure I saw motion capture on the special features of Uncharted 1 and 2
 

The Youth Counselor

New member
Sep 20, 2008
1,004
0
0
Jonesy911 said:
The Youth Counselor said:
Stop twisting Gage's words. He's not shit talking, but bringing up a real concern. It's just a shame he's a professional and not entitled to the privilege to make simple comments that we all enjoy.

It's true, if you look at L.A. Noire's MotionScan technology, the actors are confined to a small sphere of stationary cameras and have to sit stiffly without actual real life interactions. That's not natural, and limits the acting and animation potential.

Compare that to say Jame's Cameron's Avatar or Resident Evil 5 where cameras were attached to the actor's heads and shooting their faces and had them actually move around and interact. That makes a load of difference.

Still this great motion capture technology still can't hold if your characters aren't believable. Naughty Dog, VALVe, and Pixar animate mostly by hand. No motion capture just, looking at references and moving sliders! And look where that has taken them.
Whoa whoa wait a second, "Naughty Dog, VALVe, and Pixar animate mostly by hand. No motion capture just, looking at references and moving sliders!". I don't know about the other two but I'm like 100% sure I saw motion capture on the special features of Uncharted 1 and 2
When I say animate mostly by hand, I meant the facial aspect. Maybe "no motion capture" shouldn't have been the best choice of word. They use limited motion capture. These three companies have a popular animator mindset that using real facial motions will limit expression and lead to the uncanny valley and the most emotional animation needs the exaggeration that only hand animation can provide.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnru0qLBHRg#t=3m30s
 

Jonesy911

New member
Jul 6, 2009
789
0
0
The Youth Counselor said:
Jonesy911 said:
The Youth Counselor said:
Stop twisting Gage's words. He's not shit talking, but bringing up a real concern. It's just a shame he's a professional and not entitled to the privilege to make simple comments that we all enjoy.

It's true, if you look at L.A. Noire's MotionScan technology, the actors are confined to a small sphere of stationary cameras and have to sit stiffly without actual real life interactions. That's not natural, and limits the acting and animation potential.

Compare that to say Jame's Cameron's Avatar or Resident Evil 5 where cameras were attached to the actor's heads and shooting their faces and had them actually move around and interact. That makes a load of difference.

Still this great motion capture technology still can't hold if your characters aren't believable. Naughty Dog, VALVe, and Pixar animate mostly by hand. No motion capture just, looking at references and moving sliders! And look where that has taken them.
Whoa whoa wait a second, "Naughty Dog, VALVe, and Pixar animate mostly by hand. No motion capture just, looking at references and moving sliders!". I don't know about the other two but I'm like 100% sure I saw motion capture on the special features of Uncharted 1 and 2
When I say animate mostly by hand, I meant the facial aspect. Maybe "no motion capture" shouldn't have been the best choice of word. They use limited motion capture.

Ah, I see
 

Yossarian1507

New member
Jan 20, 2010
681
0
0
Jonesy911 said:
the characters were such cardboard cut-out stereotypes (Beat cop, whore with a heart etc.) that it made the game insufferable.
First of all, you are referring to the two background characters (I'm assuming your examples are Blake and Lauren). The main characters (except from Madison, who suffered greatly from the cut out content) are better in this department. Sure, it's easy to dismiss Ethan as a 'papa wolf', or Jayden as the 'by the book' cop, but I think there's more to that in those cases. For example, the scene with Nathaniel perfectly shows how 'I'm not killing anyone' behavior can be right, but also how dangerous, and how your emotions combined with a split second decision can either save or ef up the day. Jayden's reaction to his decision in the following scene (especially in case of his moral hangover if he'll decide to pull the trigger) shapes him really well as a character. This actually brings me to my two other points, which are...

You used two background characters to call the game on flat character stereotypes. Let me ask you - which game, movie, book or whatever has a cast made fully of original characters? Even the glorious examples of personality characterization, like Persona 4, have some. Why? Because it's impossible to make it otherwise. If you'll put 30 characters in the game, you're not going to make all of them look original, unless you're some kind of a prodigy.

And finally - you can boil down 99% of fictional characters into cardboard stereotypes. In Se7en, we have a story of a calm, veteran, 'I'm too old for this crap' cop accompanied by young, unexperienced, impulsive partner. They're both chasing a religious freak and fanatic. You have an avatar from Cowboy Bebop. That's an anime about 'cowboy' type badass with a dark past. Faye Valentine? Dirty thief, who's actually a nice person inside. Ed? A typical prodigy cloud cuckoolander. I can go on an on, but there's no need to. It's not about about original concept, it's about execution. This is the thing that made detectives Sommerset and Miles, John Doe, Spike Spiegel and the rest an awesome characters. And in my opinion, in Heavy Rain the execution is very good as well.
 

jhlip

New member
Feb 17, 2011
311
0
0
MarsProbe said:
jhlip said:
The Dev seems kind of arrogant if you ask me.
My thoughts exactly. Maybe when this guy manages to make a statement without sounding like a self-important twat, I may listen to him. Until that day though, I'm not paying attention.
Amen man. Seriously, what type of dick trys to pump up his own product when asked about another one. And not only that, who insults a work that is considered a revolution by some just to left themselves on a pedestal?
 

oldtaku

New member
Jan 7, 2011
639
0
0
So now that Quantic has Ultimate Motion Capture perhaps they will have time to do something about the incredibly bad game mechanics and screamingly bad plots.
 

Jonesy911

New member
Jul 6, 2009
789
0
0
Yossarian1507 said:
Jonesy911 said:
the characters were such cardboard cut-out stereotypes (Beat cop, whore with a heart etc.) that it made the game insufferable.
First of all, you are referring to the two background characters (I'm assuming your examples are Blake and Lauren). The main characters (except from Madison, who suffered greatly from the cut out content) are better in this department. Sure, it's easy to dismiss Ethan as a 'papa wolf', or Jayden as the 'by the book' cop, but I think there's more to that in those cases. For example, the scene with Nathaniel perfectly shows how 'I'm not killing anyone' behavior can be right, but also how dangerous, and how your emotions combined with a split second decision can either save or ef up the day. Jayden's reaction to his decision in the following scene (especially in case of his moral hangover if he'll decide to pull the trigger) shapes him really well as a character. This actually brings me to my two other points, which are...

You used two background characters to call the game on flat character stereotypes. Let me ask you - which game, movie, book or whatever has a cast made fully of original characters? Even the glorious examples of personality characterization, like Persona 4, have some. Why? Because it's impossible to make it otherwise. If you'll put 30 characters in the game, you're not going to make all of them look original, unless you're some kind of a prodigy.

And finally - you can boil down 99% of fictional characters into cardboard stereotypes. In Se7en, we have a story of a calm, veteran, 'I'm too old for this crap' cop accompanied by young, unexperienced, impulsive partner. They're both chasing a religious freak and fanatic. You have an avatar from Cowboy Bebop. That's an anime about 'cowboy' type badass with a dark past. Faye Valentine? Dirty thief, who's actually a nice person inside. Ed? A typical prodigy cloud cuckoolander. I can go on an on, but there's no need to. It's not about about original concept, it's about execution. This is the thing that made detectives Sommerset and Miles, John Doe, Spike Spiegel and the rest an awesome characters. And in my opinion, in Heavy Rain the execution is very good as well.
1. None of Heavy Rain's characters are original except maybe one. I've seen Ethan 100 times before, he's a man pushed to the edge ready to do anything to save the one thing in this world that he still loves. I've seen Jayden 100 times before, he's the most bland version of the cop with problems I've seen. The only one whose everyline of dialogue I could not predict was Shelby's and even then it was obvious exactly how his story was going to pan out

2.There were no original set pieces. Everytime I could list movie after movie where I'd seen it done before (car compacter, strip at gun point, drowned in car, mexican stand off, driving against traffic, so on and so on)

3. You're right, 99% of fictional characters can be boiled down to stereotypes. That's why it's vital that they have strong dialogue, characterisation and peformance, 3 things that Heavy Rain lacks ("AAAAAM DI-TEK-TIV NAAAAHMAN JAAYDEN", "JASOOON? JAAYSON?")

However that's not to say Heavy Rain was all bad. I think it did well in creating a sense that this was your story by constantly bombarding you with chioces. Also, unlike most, I actually enjoyed the brutality of the QTE's. They were really effective at making you feel like victory/death was just a heartbeat away.

But it's entirely possible that I'm being overly critical, as a film student I've had to literally watch hundreds and hundreds of detective/mystery films. At this point when someone puts on a crime thriller I'm basically seeing Matrix code like I'm fucking Neo.
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
InsomniJack said:
And all this coming from the guy who gave us this [http://burnallzombies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/heavy-rain-video-game-01.jpg?w=150]?

And he's saying this [http://ps3media.ign.com/ps3/image/article/115/1152732/la-noire-20110228111545520-000.jpg] is a dead end?

No, go on, Mr. Cage. I'd love to hear more. Just pardon the stifling of my uproaring laughter.
It's the technique behind the result. Rockstar does two takes, one of the body and one of the face, and then meshes them together, but this provides some serious hurdles to jump over, like lighting and certain adjustments and whatnot. Quantic Dream is supposedly using technology that captures both the body and the face at the same time or something like that, and that gives much more freedom to animators and developers.

By all means, the faces in Heavy Rain weren't exactly the best. It was Quantic Dream's first "next/this-gen" game, so some flaws are to be expected, but for what it is it does it fairly well.

But regardless of this mudslinging, I take this all as some friendly competition. Cage will either put up or shut up, and in the end, no matter who loses, we win with the best animation in the end (I'm an animation nut, so this is just good news all around for me).