Hitting... Women

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
18,580
3,538
118
Certainly, it is wrong to go round hitting people.

Based on the idea that the man is always superior, there's a big difference between a woman hitting him, and him hitting back. Also based on how domestic violence works in our society, it's more usually a male who commits serious violence, which has been taken as always a male who commits any by people who skip a few details.
 

Caiphus

Social Office Corridor
Mar 31, 2010
1,181
0
0
I swear, we seem to have these threads every month.

Nathaniel Grey said:
from my grandmother who gave me explicit directions that if anyone ever messed with me I was allowed to knock them out.
First, who would teach a child this? This seems like poor guidance to me. "If someone calls you names, Timmy, feel free to unleash your fists o' fury". In fact my own father taught me almost the opposite. So I have a feeling we're going to reach an impasse, OP.

Nathaniel Grey said:
I'm looking for a logical argument.
I suppose mine would be something like this:

Women have roughly half the upper body strength of men, on average.
Women are roughly half a foot shorter than men, on average.
Women are roughly ten to fifteen kilograms lighter than men, on average.

Therefore, women are less likely to pose a physical threat than men.

In cases of self defence, it is generally required for the defender to believe that they were in danger for the defence to be justified. This is less likely, although not certainly, to be the case, because of the previous arguments (and almost definitely not the case if the woman is armed).

In cases of non-self defence, moral outrage is generally increased if the victim is unable to defend themselves or weaker than the aggressor, for example with kids etc. Furthermore, damage is likely to be higher. You can conceivably kill someone smaller than you with a single punch to the head.

So clearly, "don't hit women" doesn't apply in all circumstances. But, again on average, hitting women is going to be less justified/more dangerous/more morally outrageous than hitting a man.

It's the same sort of logic behind weight classes in boxing. Even highly trained professionals are liable to get their asses handed to them if there's so much as a 5-10 kg difference between them.
 

Bellvedere

New member
Jul 31, 2008
794
0
0
The shocking part isn't necessarily just because it's a man hitting a woman - I would think a perceived strength disparity is the more shocking factor. I mean, it's always shocking to see someone that appears much stronger beating someone that appears much weaker. Like if an adult hits a child or a huge bouncer at a club pounds some weedy trouble-maker. I would also imagine that you wouldn't see nearly such a strong reaction if it were a petite man hitting a beefy, body-building chick.

I suppose when you're teaching young children it's easier to reinforce not hitting girls than it is trusting the child's judgement about who it's ridiculously unfair to engage in a fight with.
 

Bellvedere

New member
Jul 31, 2008
794
0
0
The shocking part isn't necessarily just because it's a man hitting a woman - I would think a perceived strength disparity is the more shocking factor. I mean, it's always shocking to see someone that appears much stronger beating someone that appears much weaker. Like if an adult hits a child or a huge bouncer at a club pounds some weedy trouble-maker. I would also imagine that you wouldn't see nearly such a strong reaction if it were a petite man hitting a beefy, body-building chick.

I suppose when you're teaching young children it's easier to reinforce not hitting girls than it is trusting the child's judgement about who it's ridiculously unfair to engage in a fight with.
 

Amir Kondori

New member
Apr 11, 2013
932
0
0
You shouldn't hit a woman because you shouldn't hit anyone. If you fear for your life/safety to the point where you feel you need to physically defend yourself then sure, it does not matter the gender of your assailant. How often does that happen? I haven't been in a fight since I was in middle school.
The people who say "never hit a woman" for the most part aren't talking about this bizarre, one in a million scenario people dream up of the woman in a back alley coming at you with a broken beer bottle. They are talking about people who get upset, lose their temper and hit a woman they know or are in a relationship with because they can.
If everyone just used common sense there would be less of these types of threads.
 

Ubiquitous Duck

New member
Jan 16, 2014
472
0
0
*Spoiler from Wolf of Wall Street*

I'm going to use a spoiler to talk on this, but there are spoilers in the original post, so I'm assuming its fine.

From what I remember the 'deep inhale' you spoke of happened when I was watching too, but it did not happen when he slapped her. From what I remember, it happened when he punched her in the stomach when she was following after her. This is much more aggressive than a slap.

I did comment to the person I saw it with though that I thought it was kind of weird, considering all the content of that movie, that jointly it was only that one moment where people were like: Oh shit! Man he has taken this too far!

Maybe it's also because we aren't used to seeing this kind of domestic violence on film as much as we are used to seeing drunken antics, debauchery, sex, drugs etc.?

*Spoiler from Wolf of Wall Street*
 

VanQ

Casual Plebeian
Oct 23, 2009
2,729
0
0
Equality means equal consequences. If you would slap a man in that exact situation, there is nothing wrong with slapping a woman. That's not to say it's a good idea to slap anyone, just that if you deem it acceptable to do X to a man in situation Y, but not the same to a woman for the reason that she's a woman, wouldn't that be mysoginy?
 

mistahzig1

New member
May 29, 2013
137
0
0
How 'bout not hitting ANYONE unless your life or physcal integrity is on the line?

It's appealing to the common denominator to retliate in kind, no?


And as for the women thing, singling out a demographic group simply transforms feminism into neo-paternalism, and we don't want that, right?
 

EvilMaggot

New member
Sep 18, 2008
1,430
0
0
i once got smacked by a girlfriend.. we had a heated argument.. i stood for 2 seconds.. stunned.. ive never been smacked before... i had enough self control not to hit her back.. but my temper flew up where only few people have ever seen me.. its been described to me as my pupils turn fully black and then hell breaks lose. In a very low hissy kinda voice.. i told her to get the fuck out of my house. She started to cry.. she had never seen me that angry and how menacing i looked.

But no.. never hit a person in my life, words can hurt way much more.
 

The Wykydtron

"Emotions are very important!"
Sep 23, 2010
5,458
0
0
delta4062 said:
JoJo said:
Well, one reason not to hit back might be that if the authorities get involved, chances are they'll assume the man was the aggressor, especially in domestic situations, and you could find yourself in legal hotwater if you don't have any good witnesses to back up your side of the story. Some would say hitting back isn't worth the risk of an assault charge, especially as on average women are physically weaker than men so restraining the assailant wouldn't be too hard in most cases.
I wouldn't worry about that even. More so if you're in a public place and someone just see's you hit a woman. More than likely someone is going to intervene and try and beat you up.
The Wykydtron said:
I haven't been in that sort of situation since school years ago and i've only ever been slapped once. I was shocked that the chick would slap me over something so petty (she was trying to take my seat!) so I never really thought to hit back. I would never hit anyone at all if I could help it, even in retaliation. I'm not even the type to flip out in anger either. In fact if someone told me they had done something terrible like, I dunno slept with my girlfriend or what have you, I am sure I would take it in stride and barely react even if I was upset over it.

Not that I would do much damage anyway, i'm scrawny as fuck since I don't really exercise and I miss entirely too many meals for no reason. What can I say? I hate leaving the house. You people with proper social lives have no idea what you're missing, I just went 9/0 with Lina lvl 16 with an Aghanim's and Bloodstone by 25 minutes. The fucking Laguna Blade oneshots were hilarious. Try doing that when you're off in town doing whatever it is people do in the evenings outside.
Can we please stop with comments like these? They're really not needed. We get it. Being alone and playing LoL or someshit is hip and cool. We don't need sarcastic comments that just help with stereotypes on these forums.
I was being sarcastic? Silly DOTA joke aside, I was being perfectly honest but just really exaggerated. Sorry if I fit into whatever stereotype you're talking about and i've never seen anything too close to what I said on these forums before anyway. We were on the subject of hitting people so the thought naturally occurred to me that even if I did hit someone it would be hilariously bad. Pretty much undermining the entire point of the argument if you think about it.

No sorry, I made the mistake of posting on a serious thread. My sense of humour and how I must attempt to end a comment with a joke always gets misunderstood. It's on the border of a sexism topic too, how blind could I have been? Damn posting in the early hours...
 

Shinkicker444

New member
Dec 6, 2011
349
0
0
Well I'm very much non-confrontational, mostly because i'm tiny (30 year old ~46-48 kg male) in comparison to most people, including women. So I usually go out of my way to avoid anything remotely resembling a physically threatening situation. Saying that though, when I've had people hit me in the past (mostly in the arm or something) I've hit them back on reflex before I even realise it in the same spot. It's a little disturbing really since it could get me into a dangerous situation. In general though for me, I don't agree with hitting people in aggression it usually ends badly one way or the other, but if it is in defense, regardless if its male or female, then yeah, hit away if needed.
 

Seydaman

New member
Nov 21, 2008
2,494
0
0
I can't think of any arguments to give preferential treatment to women over men in regards to such things.

If need be, I would punch another woman. But I am against violence in general.
 

Techno Squidgy

New member
Nov 23, 2010
1,045
0
0
EvilMaggot said:
i once got smacked by a girlfriend.. we had a heated argument.. i stood for 2 seconds.. stunned.. ive never been smacked before... i had enough self control not to hit her back.. but my temper flew up where only few people have ever seen me.. its been described to me as my pupils turn fully black and then hell breaks lose. In a very low hissy kinda voice.. i told her to get the fuck out of my house. She started to cry.. she had never seen me that angry and how menacing i looked.

But no.. never hit a person in my life, words can hurt way much more.
I can imagine things would probably go like this if I were in the same situatuion. Just without the demon baby, spawn-of-satan stuff at the end ;)

On a semi-related note, me and a close friend of mine are constantly on the edge of fighting. We both like to wind each other up, and sometimes it just goes too far. I remember this one time, I can't quite remember the lead up to it, but we were standing about a foot away from each other, maybe less, he's absolutely livid. Foaming at the mouth angry, he balls up his fist and draws his arm back. "You better hit me fucking good if you expect to get out of this fight without a mark."
He pauses. "Why are you bringing Mark into this man, this is between us." Pause. At this point I laugh, he laughs, he hits me on the arm, I give him a dead arm. Situation resolved. It is literally just a matter of time before one of us seriously injures the other. And that's fine. Because as long as I put him in hospital first, he can't hit me back!
 

Someone Depressing

New member
Jan 16, 2011
2,417
0
0
If someone slapped me as hard as they could, I would try my best to restrain myself.

If I was stressed, the argument was heated and/or directed at me, then I'd slap them back. Regardless of gender.

I was raised on one principal: Stick up for myself, always. I tend not to because of being somewhat non-confrontational by nature, but I will if I have to.
 

HorrendusOne

New member
Mar 29, 2011
44
0
0
Humans are humans I see no difference these days between the 2 genders in a more modern world. Only factor in this topic is morals, stereo-types, and situational situations.

The question SHOULD actually be why isn't hitting other people ok? We have no actual NEED to fight each other for survival (we only still fight and kill over ideologies and greed) when we should be living in a more civilized fashion (which we obvious do not).
 

Tarcolt

New member
Oct 13, 2010
48
0
0
Wow this got away from the OP.

First, I'm assuming that you are referring to a slap thrown in anger or frustration, where the 1st party has no other way to explain justify etc. to the 2nd, or the 1st party is just a ***** (They do exist). in the heat of a confrontation BOTH parties are involved in stress and tension would be high and inhibitions will be low. It IS a Natural response whether we choose to think our race is beyond it or not, It is FANTASTIC if its an urge you can resist but it can be hard.

Second, the matter of slapping back, probably depends on the manner in which the first party slaps the 2nd originally. If it was to call attention to something or as a final 'remark' then its best to try and let it go. If it is Aggressive and/or an attempt at dominance then it is time to gauge whether or not to engage in a physical response, will it stop them? surprise them? or just start a fight? in the heat of the moment it is really hard to tell and Impossible to tell from a hypothetical situation.

Finally, the old 'don't hit girls' rule, this is something all men should try and live by, if only for those of us who do beat their wives/girlfriends and who are abusive. However this isn't a free pass, and in my time I have seen one or two relationships in which the men couldn't respond without being physical, It doesn't make things better all the time, one of those relationships kept going after they made up for him being man enough not to hit back. the other Led to further abuse and psychological problems for the man who Is now horribly afraid of women. The point of those two stories is probably that its not so cut and dry, The situation is unique in every instance and to say what should be done universally is just dumb.

And before anyone does respond with overzealous pacifism, I must reiterate, Physical response is not a go-to response it is only to be used in cases where other options(there are not Always others) are gone.
 

Tomeran

New member
Nov 17, 2011
156
0
0
Im not sure if you're after the "why not hit women when hitting men is sometimes even encouraged?"-argument here, that one would be a good discussion topic.

If you're simply after "why not hit a woman?" then...than's not really a discussion. Its a fairly stupid question, even.

Because the answer to the second question is painfully obvious, I'll try to answer the first one:


We live in a society where women are gradually getting more equal to men, but where violence against women is still highly prevalent and "specialized". Women get brutalized on a daily basis and are the subject of a kind of violence and harassment that most men dont face. This in turn has created a sort of general "gentlemens code" over the last two centuries where it has become more and more prevalent that you simply dont hurt women. The idea seems to be that you can hurt men all you want because "they can take it" and women cant, so the idea itself is born a little out of bigotry.

However there might also be a trace reason that violence is prevalent in male culture and has not had a big part in female culture in human history, and therefore hitting a woman would count as "hitting a non-combatant" in a sense, something that has been considered wrong for a long time.

So yeah, old gender roles and stereotypes play a role.


These days? Well, with the rise of feminism and women in more and more positions that were previously dominated by men, the lines between "combatant" and "non-combatant" is getting a little blurry in some countries. So the "dont hit a woman"-just because she's a woman-code might be on the way out. That and there's a crisscross of "political correctness" where the old is in conflict with the new, so you'll find that people are generally quite divided over this so far.

Of course due to the nature of this argument I need to add that you shouldnt hit people in the first place, but I figured I'd try putting it in historical and cultural context.
 

GundamSentinel

The leading man, who else?
Aug 23, 2009
4,448
0
0
JoJo said:
Well, one reason not to hit back might be that if the authorities get involved, chances are they'll assume the man was the aggressor, especially in domestic situations, and you could find yourself in legal hotwater if you don't have any good witnesses to back up your side of the story.
Which is weird, as in most cases it's women who initiate violence in domestic cases. When it concerns nonreciprocal domestic violence, in 70% of the cases the woman is the perpetrator (Journal of Public Health study).

Me, if someone hits me I doubt I'd hit back, whoever it is. I'm not really a violent person.

Captcha: four by two
Captcha does not share my opinion apparently.