HOLY FUCK THIS OPPRESSIVE SHIT IN MY OWN STATE?!?!(Lol Australia)

Capt. Crankypants

New member
Jan 6, 2010
782
0
0
Furburt said:
Lucas_90 said:
That's all well and good, efficiency is always desirable, but what I'm annoyed about is that swearing, which is a fairly broad term, is included on the list in the first place as a public nuisance.

It just doesn't make sense to me, I mean, if some kid's shouting curse words at police officers, then by all means, fine the fuck out of him, but if someone is just casually swearing, for example, like I just did there, are they culpable as well? I haven't read the official word, but that article didn't make it clear what and in what context is something considered "swearing".
Yeah, I get all the worry, and the media are weaving this into a deprivation of liberty thing, which gives everyone a messed up idea of what's really going on. I believe I read a snippet from the Courier Mail confirming that the introduction of this legislation is an acceptance at the end of a 6 month trial period which went largely unnoticed it would seem by the majority of the public.

Yes, I suppose they COULD be culpable, but Australia is very strict with how the police operate. Ever since the Fitzgerald Inquiry, people have been watching the QLD police like a hawk. They have to be accountable for every action they take, and if they do hand out stupid fines for casual swearing, then yes, the fine will be appealed and most likely successfully.

Anyone in Australia who has had contact with the police over matters of a non-serious nature, and has treated them with common courtesy, will find they respond in kind, and will often simply ask that you cease, or give you a warning. Fines and penalties are for the jerks.

(Is actually suprised by how little backlash he's had for these comments, and is very grateful for the common sense that people show)
 

Duskwaith

New member
Sep 20, 2008
647
0
0
Id still shout "fuck da police!!"

Other than that cant one not call in freedom of speech?
 

The Almighty Narf

New member
Feb 13, 2010
18
0
0
It's probably like how in the US you have to pay taxes on money earned from criminal transactions... it's not because they want to arrest you for that, it's because the want to arrest you for something else they can't prove yet.

If you're swearing in front of as police officer (which, I assume, is they only way you'd get fined for swearing in public anyway) chances are they were already planning on taking you in.
 

megamanenm

New member
Apr 7, 2009
487
0
0
Antitonic said:
Damn. No offense to the OP, but all the Queenslanders I know use pauses in their speech, or opportunities to breathe as a chance to use another swear word. Sounds like a golden opportunity for the government there, although it'll just go to upgrading some politician's flight plan.

"Here's a complimentary glass of champagne, Your Mayorness, someone in Brisbane just said 'piss'."

So what happens to people with Tourette's?
Only about 20-30% of the people with Tourette's have coprolalia actually.
 

Pyotr Romanov

New member
Jul 8, 2009
575
0
0
Well, at least you can swear on the internet. FOR NOW!
After this, how long will it take untill the auto-keylog every computer that enters the state!?
 

TheScottishFella

The Know-it all Detective
Nov 9, 2009
613
0
0
wow then ZP gonna have a few problems AM I RIGHT!




(I know it says in public but I thought that was relevant)
 

LawlessSquirrel

New member
Jun 9, 2010
1,105
0
0
$100? Not that bad, I think it's around $150 for putting your feet on a seat in a train.

Can't say I'm surprised. Banning games for referencing adult content, making a secret blacklist to filter the internet, banning small-breasted women in porn... and of cause, no matter the results of elections, it's always a case of voting for the lesser evil. It almost sounds like there's problems with the Australian government.

Don't get me wrong, I love Australia. I love the cities, I love the country-side, and I love the people. It's this steady decline into totalitarianism I hate. I've not met a single person who doesn't have complaints about the blatant abuse of power.
 

sabbat

New member
Apr 29, 2010
228
0
0
In England, if you swear in public, you may face the dreaded Anti Social Behaviour Order (ASBO). Believe me, with the stigma attatched to ASBO's, Id rather a fine. I don't want people thinking I'm a hooligan just because I got caught swearing once whilst walking down the street. Shit not be worth it, yo!
 

Woodsey

New member
Aug 9, 2009
14,553
0
0
Other than the Dutch I can't think of a people who are supposedly so laid-back, yet everyone in your government seems to be so uptight they can't take a shit without medical assistance.

Mcface said:
This site will somehow find a way to blame America either way.
/facepalm

And how old are you?
 

sabbat

New member
Apr 29, 2010
228
0
0
Vhlad said:
AshPox said:
Finally, I am so sick of people swearing so much.

Some people don't hate swearing, but when every single person is swearing non-stop all day everyday you get kinda sick of it.

So go on, bring the fines.
fuck you!
Woah, Guys, don't get so offended by this guy. If he doesn't like swearing, that's his buisness. And it's certainly his right to freely say that he doesn't like it. Ok, so this ban thing maybe shitty, but lashing out at someone for not seeing it as a bad thing is the wrong approach*. Chill out.

*Could you guys tell me if my spelling is right?