After 30, +/- 10 years I say.PureChaos said:Where I work I deal with divorces and there are a lot of couples where the age gap is pretty large, the highest i've dealt with is an gap of 23 years and have heard of other cases where the gap it 25 years, sometimes more. I'm 24 so that would mean me ending up marrying someone who isn't even born yet. at the moment, for me, 3 or 4 years is OK but not much more than that.
what do you think? is there a point where it gets a bit creepy, like 19 year olds marrying people 50+ or is age unimportant when it comes to relationships?
Probably because he isPhlakes said:Wow. He's old enough to be her grandfather.Sovreign said:One of the men I go to school with is 65 and is dating a 21 year old woman.
i smell a sitcom!TheLiham said:Probably because he isPhlakes said:Wow. He's old enough to be her grandfather.Sovreign said:One of the men I go to school with is 65 and is dating a 21 year old woman.
but aside from eleven fingered children, 14 and 23 is a bit weird
But then.. you gotta know how old the other person actually is, not exactly a polite question to ask from the off.Eponet said:Half your age + 7 seems to be the accepted lower age band where I am.
If you're younger, just apply it to the other person.
At the beginning as well. If one party is younger than 14, (say 13) that means the minimum age you should consider is 13.5. Paradox or a mathematical argument that people shouldn't date before the age of 14?starfox444 said:Near the end of your life conventional mathematics breaks down.Merkavar said:so if your 80? its ok to date a 47 year old?The Almighty Grigard said:Easy, X is the older persons age
(X/2)+7= the lowest age its "ok" to date
So if you are 20, it's ok to date someone 17 or older. Math can solve anything!
The age gap that I find acceptable is no more or less than a 3-year difference.PureChaos said:Where I work I deal with divorces and there are a lot of couples where the age gap is pretty large, the highest i've dealt with is an gap of 23 years and have heard of other cases where the gap it 25 years, sometimes more. I'm 24 so that would mean me ending up marrying someone who isn't even born yet. at the moment, for me, 3 or 4 years is OK but not much more than that.
what do you think? is there a point where it gets a bit creepy, like 19 year olds marrying people 50+ or is age unimportant when it comes to relationships?
is that regardless of the age they are?zHellas said:The age gap that I find acceptable is no more or less than a 3-year difference.PureChaos said:Where I work I deal with divorces and there are a lot of couples where the age gap is pretty large, the highest i've dealt with is an gap of 23 years and have heard of other cases where the gap it 25 years, sometimes more. I'm 24 so that would mean me ending up marrying someone who isn't even born yet. at the moment, for me, 3 or 4 years is OK but not much more than that.
what do you think? is there a point where it gets a bit creepy, like 19 year olds marrying people 50+ or is age unimportant when it comes to relationships?
PureChaos said:is that regardless of the age they are?zHellas said:The age gap that I find acceptable is no more or less than a 3-year difference.PureChaos said:Where I work I deal with divorces and there are a lot of couples where the age gap is pretty large, the highest i've dealt with is an gap of 23 years and have heard of other cases where the gap it 25 years, sometimes more. I'm 24 so that would mean me ending up marrying someone who isn't even born yet. at the moment, for me, 3 or 4 years is OK but not much more than that.
what do you think? is there a point where it gets a bit creepy, like 19 year olds marrying people 50+ or is age unimportant when it comes to relationships?