masturbation with sand paper? really? no seriously though, really? whyyyyyyyyy would anyone every do that to themselves, does this director realize what it feels like to have a schlong and how much it would hurt your pecker to vigorously rub sand paper on it?
Human Centipede II Refused U.K. Classification
- Thread starter vansau
- Start date
Well... I'm all for free speech and highly against films being censored and all... But this sounds like it was way too much. Mainly because of the fact it's done without reason, the plot sounds lazy as fuck and there's no real attempt to get any themes across from an art standpoint.
Some of these things may have double standards, but fuck it, was this really necessary? He's just out to sell controversy.
Some of these things may have double standards, but fuck it, was this really necessary? He's just out to sell controversy.
Probably, seeing as how the first movie was billed as "100% Medically Accurate".liljabba said:
On that note, can you imagine the conversation at a doctor's office?
"So, I'm directing this movie and have a medical question."
"OK, shoot."
"What would it look like if a guy masturbated with sandpaper?"
"Uuuuuuhh... I'm sorry, what?"
Eh, the original Human Centipede was an overrated shock-thriller-horror film that ended up looking more hilarious and stupid than scary; skirting Eli Roth levels of pointless stupidity rather than genuine horror.
My guess: The sequel is just going to suck that much more, based on how much it's being hyped.
My guess: The sequel is just going to suck that much more, based on how much it's being hyped.
You just referred to the victims as a thing.Celtic_Kerr said:
That's why they are not supporting it. They are afraid #2 will cause people to try this.
And I completely agree! This movie and the first one should never have been made. I saw bits of the first movie because everyone was talking about it.
There are very few things I regret in life.
Watching the human centipede is number 1 on that list.
Tokyo Gore Police is better than the human centipede.Atmos Duality said:
And that movie is weird.
You'll have to import it, then. No UK classification means it's illegal to sell in the UK, I believe.Cheesebob said:
Oh, I haven't seen any genuinely disturbing asian horror flicks for about 4 years now.Tentickles said:
I'm trying to remember the name of the last one I saw; have been since I saw this topic...
It had some truly nasty shit in it; yet it's all simple stuff. A group of brothel whores all ganging up and torturing one of their own because she broke the rules.
It's certainly *not* a movie I would enjoy watching, but at least I felt genuinely disgusted at their actions (the actual horror) and sorry for that character. Rather than laughing at the hilariously bad CGI antics of an ineptly designed movie with a flagrantly retarded plot.
The creater is just trying too hard now. The first one was already disgusting, but with its so called "100% Medical Accuracy" did seem to be *intriguing. (*I think most people watched out of curiosity though, not out of any actual interest)
However now, with this kind of a movie description, you just know he is simply trying to top the last one in the most grotesque way possible. Approx 2 hours of people being tortured, with not so much as a proper story in place? AGAIN? Come on now. A good movie (or game or book) Needs its audience to think about it afterwoulds, and analyse the impression the movie left. Showing what is, in fact a Scat Porno for 2 hours, is not an admirable feat.
Hell even SAW with its 2 hour long torture-fest at least left viewers with more of an impression than this crap. I did on occasion think about what I would do if I was ever placed in a torture chamber by "Jigsaw". Whether I would have the strength to endure the torture and live with the physical deformaties, or simply give up and let myself die quickly. It was the whole premise of the film, that was the whole point of it. "What would you do?"
HA! What are you gonna think about when you have recollections of the Human Centipede?
Which place your gonna take? (Front, Middle, Back)
Here's an example of the disturbing mixed with art : The Silent Hill series, or more specifically, SH2. James's relationship with Mary is both beautiful and sad, yet the psychology of the whole aspect of the game is brutal, tortures and disturbing. Yet, there are no grotesque sex scenes, (except for a few seconds with Pyramid head, which I might add are kept short and ambiguous). Even though it basically contains rape scenes it doesn't exactly become digusting, which alot of movies and games make the mistake of doing. With all this chaos going on, the story is still kept strong and the atmosphere is still clear.
This is kinda why human centipede fails. Its disturbing TO the point of disgusting. Yes, it does try to handle taboo, which is something I would actually like to see movies and games doing moreoften. However Human Centipede fails to balance out a good story as well as keeping the taboo and the grotesque to a reasonably watchable level.
To me, people eating their own snot is both disgusting and taboo, but just because you make a film out of that, it doesn't mean you've created a masterpiece. It just mean that I'm gonna need alot of convincing to go see that crap.
However now, with this kind of a movie description, you just know he is simply trying to top the last one in the most grotesque way possible. Approx 2 hours of people being tortured, with not so much as a proper story in place? AGAIN? Come on now. A good movie (or game or book) Needs its audience to think about it afterwoulds, and analyse the impression the movie left. Showing what is, in fact a Scat Porno for 2 hours, is not an admirable feat.
Hell even SAW with its 2 hour long torture-fest at least left viewers with more of an impression than this crap. I did on occasion think about what I would do if I was ever placed in a torture chamber by "Jigsaw". Whether I would have the strength to endure the torture and live with the physical deformaties, or simply give up and let myself die quickly. It was the whole premise of the film, that was the whole point of it. "What would you do?"
HA! What are you gonna think about when you have recollections of the Human Centipede?
Which place your gonna take? (Front, Middle, Back)
Here's an example of the disturbing mixed with art : The Silent Hill series, or more specifically, SH2. James's relationship with Mary is both beautiful and sad, yet the psychology of the whole aspect of the game is brutal, tortures and disturbing. Yet, there are no grotesque sex scenes, (except for a few seconds with Pyramid head, which I might add are kept short and ambiguous). Even though it basically contains rape scenes it doesn't exactly become digusting, which alot of movies and games make the mistake of doing. With all this chaos going on, the story is still kept strong and the atmosphere is still clear.
This is kinda why human centipede fails. Its disturbing TO the point of disgusting. Yes, it does try to handle taboo, which is something I would actually like to see movies and games doing moreoften. However Human Centipede fails to balance out a good story as well as keeping the taboo and the grotesque to a reasonably watchable level.
To me, people eating their own snot is both disgusting and taboo, but just because you make a film out of that, it doesn't mean you've created a masterpiece. It just mean that I'm gonna need alot of convincing to go see that crap.
I never thought I'd agree with the BBFC. It just seems all too damn clear that the director is acting out some personal fantasy, it doesn't even seem intended to entertain, or even scare, it just kind of exists like some dark part of the Internet you just want to forget you ever saw.
The description alone makes me want to bleach my eyes and brain so I can pretend I never read it. Watching the movie (either of them) would just be torture.
However, I don't agree with banning the film. It is fiction, in which case I can never agree with censorship on fictional material. If this had been realistic (in terms of being a scat recording)? My vote would be on the paper with a speed rivaling Flash himself.
However, I don't agree with banning the film. It is fiction, in which case I can never agree with censorship on fictional material. If this had been realistic (in terms of being a scat recording)? My vote would be on the paper with a speed rivaling Flash himself.
This x1000.spectrenihlus said:
Who the hell thinks this shit up? You have got to be seriously fucked in the head to create a film like this. I am totally against censorship, but good lord, at least try to make the film worth watching.