Human Centipede II Refused U.K. Classification

Recommended Videos

k-ossuburb

New member
Jul 31, 2009
1,311
0
0
MelasZepheos said:
the sort of person who would watch this movie and like it for its content is someone I would consider to be a rather dangerous individual, and I suspect would also be someone (to link to my first point) who would not be willing to divulge the nature of his leisure materials.
I might enjoy watching it, but it's got nothing to do with me wanting to recreate anything I see in the movie for myself (well, not in any actual way, you'll see what I mean further down).

I'm a horror fan, I always have been, I've been fascinated with the genre since I was a child and I watched Hellraiser for the first time. I loved the make-up, I loved the experience of sitting in the dark and having the movie lightly tease my fear response and put me on the edge of my seat. I was amazed at how someone was able to have horrible things done to them through the magic of special effects.

I've always seen it as fiction, even when I was a kid I knew it was fake. So a movie like this is probably something I'd watch for the learning experience, it might show me how to do something I've never seen done before and make me want to figure out how I can replicate that effect myself with simple materials like latex and tissue paper, but I'd never do that to a real person.

The actual stuff going on in the movie sounds like it's trying way too hard to go for shock value, so it's probably a movie I'd laugh at more than feel any disgust towards. I'll just see it as a lame attempt to get in with the more accomplished horror movies so it can never meet any expectation other than a very, very low one.

I can watch the actors have corn syrup thrown over them and have their fake limbs torn to shreds and laugh at it because I know it's fiction and I can simply laugh at how pathetically hard it's trying to illicit a response from me of horror or disgust when it's just going about it in such an unsubtle way, only showing how little the director knows about the horror genre and how much effort it actually takes to make a good horror movie which can make me both terrified and disgusted with just a few sound effects and a well-placed shadow.

However, it's not like I'm completely devoid of empathy. Yes, I can laugh at horror movies that are showing some of the worst stuff imaginable, but I have literally cried like a baby after watching a documentary about abuse cases against the mentally disabled in one of UK's asylums. Why? Because that actually happened, it wasn't fiction. Those were real people suffering real pain, not actors. The abuse they went through for years was not staged for entertainment, it was to expose the system and force some action to be taken against it. So, I cried.

The point is, I could easily enjoy even the sickest, more depraved and horrifically graphic movie ever made (which I'm guessing The Human Centipede II is trying its hardest to be) because I know that it's nothing but fiction. I understand the mechanics behind it and what makes it work and what makes it not work as a horror movie. I might enjoy the learning experience of the movie and figuring out how they did some of the effects, I might even enjoy just how pathetic it in its attempts to call itself a movie, but I'll probably not enjoy the movie itself, because it sounds like it sucks balls when compared to some of the really good horror movies out there.

So, basically, people like horror movies for different reasons and just because they like them doesn't automatically make them a dangerous person is probably what my point is.

Sorry for the long post, I'm one of those types of fans who feels the need to defend their fandom at even the slightest provocation, I suppose. I don't mean any offense by this post.
 

EradiusLore

New member
Jun 29, 2010
154
0
0
i think the reason its not going to be shown in UK cinemas is because we have taste and this film was just bad...really bad

p.s. to clarify i mean it sucked ass
 

GLo Jones

Activate the Swagger
Feb 13, 2010
1,192
0
0
Well, it's good to see the BBFC protecting the mindless drones paying to see movies they haven't heard of before. Seriously, you get some real idiots complaining about the content of movies like this, when a small investigation tends to warn you beforehand.

Wouldn't the people to the back of the centipede die from not eating proper food?
 

Wilko316

New member
Jun 16, 2010
260
0
0
...
Just wow ...
The first film was just awful enough, but this sounds like a whole other step across the line.
 

w-Jinksy

New member
May 30, 2009
961
0
0
New York Patrick said:
Wait... THEY WERE ABLE TO FUND AND PRODUCE A SECOND HUMAN CENTIPIDE!?!?!?

My.. my faith in the human race is completely gone now...
Really you should have lost that when the first one got funded and produced.
 

Vibhor

New member
Aug 4, 2010
713
0
0
GLo Jones said:
Well, it's good to see the BBFC protecting the mindless drones paying to see movies they haven't heard of before. Seriously, you get some real idiots complaining about the content of movies like this, when a small investigation tends to warn you beforehand.

Wouldn't the people to the back of the centipede die from not eating proper food?
Let me guess, you have yet to watch or even hear about the first one.
Let me give you a piece of advice. Do not go anywhere near this movie or its prequel. Trust me, you may not be able to think straight for weeks.
 

Artina89

New member
Oct 27, 2008
3,623
0
0
spectrenihlus said:
I think the travesty here is that this film got a sequel.
I agree with this. I thought the first film was a terible, terrible film, and I had no plans to see the second one anyway. I am a bit surprised that the BBFC has not allowed this movie to be shown in Britain. I thought that they stopped doing "video nasties" in the 80's.
 

Cipher1

New member
Feb 28, 2011
290
0
0
Good, Im glad I live in England where the government can ban certain films (they dont do it all that much) and no one would really mind if this happened in America then most people would be talking about the censorship of art as a posed to how garbage the film.

In all honesty this film just sounds like a rather odd porno.
 

Kenbo Slice

Deep In The Willow
Jun 7, 2010
2,706
0
41
Gender
Male
First movie sucked, It wasn't as shocking as everyone said it was plus it was super fucking boring.
 

Anachronism

New member
Apr 9, 2009
1,842
0
0
DustyDrB said:
Well look at that. Censorship finally gets one in the win column.
Agreed. If this film had any artistic merit, I would be against this, but it doesn't. To quote MovieBob, it's a worthless, artless piece of shit that doesn't deserve to be seen. It getting banned can only be a good thing.
 

Byere

New member
Jan 8, 2009
730
0
0
WrongSprite said:
Good, nobody will try to show it to me now.
Well don't go and watch shows like The Cinema Snob or such then, because you just KNOW it's going to be shown there at some point or another.

OT: Yes, well I can't say I'm either surprised or bothered that it's not coming to the UK. I certainly won't miss it
 

Demonicdan

New member
Dec 8, 2010
205
0
0
You've got ot wonder what kind of freak can think of these kind of things to put into a movie, I'm glad were not going to recieve this in the UK.
 

Shio

New member
Jun 4, 2011
385
0
0
zidine100 said:
To me this just sounds like a snuff movie. And im guessing the government agrees with me.
It's nothing like a snuff movie. Nor was the original.

Hell, snuff films don't even exist in reality.