And lo, there came a sweeping of the Banhammer, and a hundred voices of cheaters did cry out in pain, and it was heard across the mountains, plains, and deserts that those trolls and cheaters would be no more, but others would take their place.
I got banned from MW2 for other people being predictable, They kept coming at me from the same direction and I kept sniping them dead and got the nuke.Satsuki666 said:Didnt you know your not allowed to do anything that the developers do not approve of. It does not matter if it is in the game or even if it is a glitch or not. If the developers dont like it its not a ban worthy crime. I have actually seen stat resets and bans for things that are no where near this bad in CoD before though so this does not surprise me.Volf99 said:Is it really cheating to exploit a glitch that the game developers made? I get being ticked off by hackers, but exploiting a glitch is different.
Well I know from experience that this was common on MW2 and seems to be starting again in MW3, was this common in BF2? (I only played that online for a few hours, as for some reason that game lagged a lot for me even though the servers would quote a ping of ~50-80ms (then <300ms in game) and other games had no problems at the same time).bahumat42 said:i think that they would need to aquire a new key to add to a new origin account, Now whether or not the keys are hackable is anyones guess really.Hawk of the Plain said:I'm not a big fan of battlefield, but I welcome bans for cheaters regardless of the game.
What I want to know is, are all (or at least most) of the accounts being banned legitimate copies of the game, and not hacked copies that can just be started up again with no cost to the cheater?
They have stated that they increased security with VAC and that they have admins observing games for cheatersbahumat42 said:probablyHawk of the Plain said:Well I know from experience that this was common on MW2 and seems to be starting again in MW3, was this common in BF2? (I only played that online for a few hours, as for some reason that game lagged a lot for me even though the servers would quote a ping of ~50-80ms (then <300ms in game) and other games had no problems at the same time).bahumat42 said:i think that they would need to aquire a new key to add to a new origin account, Now whether or not the keys are hackable is anyones guess really.Hawk of the Plain said:I'm not a big fan of battlefield, but I welcome bans for cheaters regardless of the game.
What I want to know is, are all (or at least most) of the accounts being banned legitimate copies of the game, and not hacked copies that can just be started up again with no cost to the cheater?
So I guess the question is have EA with BF3 on origin, done a better job with security than IW with MW3 on steam. (in light of recent events with steam that may seem like a loaded question, I don't mean it to be, please don't read into that)
i remember the iwnet for mw2 didn't use most of valves anti cheating measures, i have little doubt they have decided to include them in this iteration. (that sounds vague, what i mean is that they probably haven't increased in security since the last game)
Agree'd. Banning is not required. Wiping the stats and levels should be sufficient. Maybe a week long ban or something, but not forever.dogstile said:Ban? Just wipe the stat's and fix the bugs, especially if a ban can make you lose access to the other games you have.
How so, exactly? There will always be ways to get around things, no matter what EA does. Exploiting is just idiotic, if you're going to play the game then do so properly. Sure, you can get 10000 points by shifting right there and pressing the G key and reciting Ovid, but that's not playing the game. No one likes it, and it's usually no better than hacking, just harder to prove.Croaker42 said:Yet another example of why I don't feel bad bowing out of this iteration multiplayer FPS. ORIGIN makes me sick and needs to stop before I step anywhere near EA again.
Also EA is disrespecting their online crowd kind of hard with this. Exploiting has gone hand in had with their games since the beginning.
First I am at a point where I realize that plenty of fun games exist in the world. Plenty fun games that don't use origin. So on that matter I stand on principal and choose not to play BF3 at all. As I am not a MW fan, I guess that leaves me out of the current gen of multiplayer FPSCatalyst6 said:How so, exactly? There will always be ways to get around things, no matter what EA does. Exploiting is just idiotic, if you're going to play the game then do so properly. Sure, you can get 10000 points by shifting right there and pressing the G key and reciting Ovid, but that's not playing the game. No one likes it, and it's usually no better than hacking, just harder to prove.Croaker42 said:Yet another example of why I don't feel bad bowing out of this iteration multiplayer FPS. ORIGIN makes me sick and needs to stop before I step anywhere near EA again.
Also EA is disrespecting their online crowd kind of hard with this. Exploiting has gone hand in had with their games since the beginning.
So what you're saying is that the player, knowing using an exploit and getting an advantage over the other players illegitimately, should always be treated better than those who play fair and square?Stainlesssteele4 said:I know you all feel like justice was served, but imagine how it must feel to be theese people. They paid 60(ish) dollars to play a game, and got banned from it because they were using an exploit that got passed the developers. That's pretty stupid if you ask me. They should get a slap on the wrist at most, but banning them on the fault of the devs is downright wrong.
I'm probably never buying another EA published game, I'm just really tired of their shit.
This brings back memories of SecuROM...