It can not be done over a computer as a computer is an object that is powered through meaning and process.
Incorrect.Fire Daemon said:It can not be done over a computer as a computer is an object that is powered through meaning and process.
Just as an interesting side note, some research has shown that infants pick up patterns and simple statistical properties in human speech. As early as 1-2 months old, if I remember correctly.Hey Joe said:I think the challenge was to find a statement that held no meaning whatsoever, not just a certain group, but it's an interesting point. I do agree that meaning is not inherent but is learned, but I'm rather of a constructionist myself.Fire Daemon said:But if a word was shown to an new born baby who had no concept of words or letters would that word have any meaning to that baby? Or would showing a blind man the image of a word hold any meaning to that man?
Oh! You wanna freak out a baby? Hold a mirror up.
Your essentially restating what Joe said at the top of the page, just speaking in broader terms.General Mostly Electrified Steel said:Utilizing a language designed with the intent of conveying meaning to produce absurdity, however, is a mission doomed to failure.
But how can we produce a 'statement' of meaninglessness OR absurdity if the very concept of the 'statement' lies within the parameters of a philosophical debate? Surely if the 'statement' as you call it uses words, then it IS doomed to failure and what you asking of us is impossible.General Mostly Electrified Steel said:Utilizing a language designed with the intent of conveying meaning to produce absurdity, however, is a mission doomed to failure.
Is that what you meant to say?
No. What I said is that everything in a computer is based on letters and numbers. And as we had allready disscused letters and numbers have meaning. So I ask you whatever your name is, how can meaninglessness (is that a word) be created on a machine based on meaning.General Mostly Electrified Steel said:Incorrect.Fire Daemon said:It can not be done over a computer as a computer is an object that is powered through meaning and process.
Utilizing a language designed with the intent of conveying meaning to produce absurdity, however, is a mission doomed to failure.
Is that what you meant to say?
Yes quite so. Pippity pip. Wait... I'm Australian aren't I? Ya bloody wanker!Pie said:Now the Escapists all grown up and full of intelligent R'tards.![]()
Are youse calling me a wanker cobber!? Oi! Strewth! Let's go and throw a shrimp on the barbie and then debate it's existence as a physical entity or merely a construct of the mind! Eh Bruce?PurpleRain said:Yes quite so. Pippity pip. Wait... I'm Australian aren't I? Ya bloody wanker!Pie said:Now the Escapists all grown up and full of intelligent R'tards.![]()
Oi too right mate.Hey Joe said:Are youse calling me a wanker cobber!? Oi! Strewth! Let's go and throw a shrimp on the barbie and then debate it's existence as a physical entity or merely a construct of the mind! Eh Bruce?PurpleRain said:Yes quite so. Pippity pip. Wait... I'm Australian aren't I? Ya bloody wanker!Pie said:Now the Escapists all grown up and full of intelligent R'tards.![]()
C'mon mate. Me and Bruce are trying to work out the meaning of all existance. So can it! Stone the flamming crows, I bet Jesus was a dingo. I bet he took my baby!Fire Daemon said:Oi too right mate.Hey Joe said:Are youse calling me a wanker cobber!? Oi! Strewth! Let's go and throw a shrimp on the barbie and then debate it's existence as a physical entity or merely a construct of the mind! Eh Bruce?PurpleRain said:Yes quite so. Pippity pip. Wait... I'm Australian aren't I? Ya bloody wanker!Pie said:Now the Escapists all grown up and full of intelligent R'tards.![]()
Coi thats a big un. I'm talking about the universe and stuff mate.
Oi, stop being a pisswit. There's no fuckin' way ta type on a fuckin' stereo. Now back to the meaning of existence mates. And hand me those tongs, you're jerkin' those snags off like a bloody woman.Pie said:PurpleRain said:C'mon mate. Me and Bruce are trying to work out the meaning of all existance. So can it! Stone the flamming crows, I bet Jesus was a dingo. I bet he took my baby!Fire Daemon said:Oi too right mate.Hey Joe said:Are youse calling me a wanker cobber!? Oi! Strewth! Let's go and throw a shrimp on the barbie and then debate it's existence as a physical entity or merely a construct of the mind! Eh Bruce?PurpleRain said:Yes quite so. Pippity pip. Wait... I'm Australian aren't I? Ya bloody wanker!Pie said:Now the Escapists all grown up and full of intelligent R'tards.![]()
Coi thats a big un. I'm talking about the universe and stuff mate.
All i can say is, Lol.
Stereotyping ftw![]()
I nominate you for Chairman of the Escapist's Evil council of DOOMPurpleRain said:I'm just reminising over the history of the Escapist.
-Back in the days when MGG was all but a developing troll. Sockpuppet and all. Now he's like... a legend or something.
-When HaliWali killed his first troll and claimed the title of Troll Slayer!
-The quote tower that was 10 miles high and 4 miles ling. Then the gods... mods destroyed it for it was a blashpemey to their name. (I started that one. YES I am rubbing all your noses in it)
-Remember the time when I was going to kill you, and you were like "No way"
-When the troll slaying epic quest adventure to fight MGG began. (And YES I started that one too. I'm not going to be graceful about this crap either!)
-That thread about using Portal quotes to talk about yor sex life. Grade A comedy.
-Memories
What fun we had together.
No, we may not start a new game now, my good friend. Why? The game has just started. Congratulations on playing.Hey Joe said:But how can we produce a 'statement' of meaninglessness OR absurdity if the very concept of the 'statement' lies within the parameters of a philosophical debate? Surely if the 'statement' as you call it uses words, then it IS doomed to failure and what you asking of us is impossible.
Especially given the codes and conventions we are using now (not to mention the wider context of the medium we are using to hold this discussion, namely, a 'forum'), I can not see how your challenge to produce a 'statement' without meaning.
Can we start a new game now?
Why haven't you considered this first before making this thread? Supposing that there is none, this thread is useless.General Mostly Electrified Steel said:At any rate, perhaps there is no universal meaninglessness? Shall we consider this first?
If the game has just started and the starting question is meaninglessness in the universe, why didn't you ask us this from the outset? If your goal was to ascertain whether or not anything has no meaning within the universe, then why go through the charade of us trying to produce a 'statement'?General Mostly Electrified Steel said:No, we may not start a new game now, my good friend. Why? The game has just started. Congratulations on playing.
Seems more like he was trying to get some Billy Goats?Hey Joe said:If the game has just started and the starting question is meaninglessness in the universe, why didn't you ask us this from the outset? If your goal was to ascertain whether or not anything has no meaning within the universe, then why go through the charade of us trying to produce a 'statement'?General Mostly Electrified Steel said:No, we may not start a new game now, my good friend. Why? The game has just started. Congratulations on playing.
Seems kinda inefficient.