ZeroMachine said:
In today's society, the fast and efficient transferal of information is vital for many aspects and businesses, and the internet is the best way to do that. If we lost all access to the internet somehow, multiple facets of society would be damaged, many beyond repair.
Alright, now this is something I will have a logical discussion about!
Yes, you are right, no doubt about it, but also, before the internet, things took longer but you also had time to look things over. We now live in a "NOW!" society, where everything has to be instant. That puts pressure on things. I'll explain what I mean when I answer your next paragraph.
ZeroMachine said:
The video game industry would crumble, and the rest of the entertainment industry would also take a massive hit.
Yes and no. It would not "crumble", per se, but there would be a lot of positives and negatives that would come about as a result. The bad news would be that indie devs would have a much harder, if not impossible, time to get their games where the masses could see them. Thanks to Steam and other sites, great indie games like "The Binding of Issac" and Braid can be seen and played by everybody. A world without indie games would be a sad one! <:-(
The good news, however, is that games would BE FORCED to ship finished. I've been playing games for years, first on a NES, then the SNES, Sega Dreamcast, PC (windows 98 FTW!) and so on and so forth. I'm always hearing about games shipping with horrible bugs (the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series is notorious for that), being practically unplayable at launch (there was a game by Stardock called Enchanted or something like that that was like that, and BRINK wouldn't work on ATI cards) or having buggy, unplayable multiplayer that constantly drops the player (Heroes of Stalingrad, Battlefield 3). Back in the old days, you had one chance and that was it. If there were bugs, they were small and were fixed with expansion packs that added a lot of content, unlike DLC. This means that designers would HAVE to release a finished game.
As for the entertainment industry, it would actually end up better without the internet. For starters, there would be less piracy (not eradicated, but a lot less) and just as many people would find out about movies, because they would see it on television, on billboards, in newspapers, from friends ... the industry has survived years without the internet. Yes, they rely on it a lot these days, but that's because the internet is huge. If the internet were to go away, it would be rough at first, but they could go back to the old way, which they still use those techniques. As for the music industry, it would also benefit from less piracy AND it would actually IMPROVE because people couldn't just spend 99 cents on a song. That's a huge problem with that sector right now.
Again, for both of those, less of an indie side, which is bad, but outside of that, things would improve overall.
ZeroMachine said:
Transferring medical records would be far more difficult than what we've come to depend on, making medicare even harder to maintain. Normal monetary transactions that we can do with a couple little clicks now could take days or weeks.
No argument here.
ZeroMachine said:
The ease of intercontinental human communication, as well as collecting information and knowledge, would disappear.
To an extent. We always have phones, but finding wouldn't be as easy, granted
ZeroMachine said:
The poster you're referring to did not once say "everything outside of it is shit". He never even implied that. He said "The internet isn't vital but it sure as shit is better than what they had before it."
He kind of did, actually, but it wasn't that post. I think it was before that quote. I sadly do not have time to look at the moment, but I will later.
ZeroMachine said:
I don't believe on judging a whole based on a part.
I usually don't either, but when it comes to 4Chan, it's different. :-/