It seems they sort of missed the point if they think it's about fictional characters having rights when what really bothers people is that rape is being reflected in a positive light in a popular medium.
Not played Rapelay but if what someone a few pages back wrote is true, the player dies at the end of every ending.geldonyetich said:It seems they sort of missed the point if they think it's about fictional characters having rights when what really bothers people is that rape is being reflected in a positive light in a popular medium.
Not true. He only dies if he gets one of the girls pregnant and fails to force her to abort her child which causes the main character to commit suicide or if he fails to break one of the girl's spirit enough resulting in her stabbing him.Amnestic said:Not played Rapelay but if what someone a few pages back wrote is true, the player dies at the end of every ending.geldonyetich said:It seems they sort of missed the point if they think it's about fictional characters having rights when what really bothers people is that rape is being reflected in a positive light in a popular medium.
I don't see how "You commit rape=You die" is a positive light.
Pretty much sums it all up for me right there. *thumbs up*spectheintro said:Admittedly, I did not read the most-assuredly BS-laden outpouring of indignation by our country's fine politicians regarding eroge, but I don't think that's the crux of the rape-game issue at all. If that line of argument (human rights for video game characters!) became the debate, then by all means, that's just moronic and they deserve to be lambasted.Kalezian said:not really.
people think fictional characters have rights too, whats there not to get?
I guess what makes me uncomfortable about the entire situation is that rape is one of those few human acts that is pretty much always bad. There are justified reasons to kill and steal. There is even some serious moral debate regarding torture. (Among philosophers, not politicians.) But there's no ethically justifiable reason to rape, ever. It's (at best) cruel punishment (raping a terrible criminal, for example), and at worst a horrendous violation of someone's person. I just can't really think of any way of having rape be a player-initiated action that's not going to be messy.
Maybe this is too serious for this thread, I dunno. I think it's a pretty funny jab on the developer's part, but the underlying issue--player-initiated rape in video games--still leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth.
I think they hit it on the mark.hURR dURR dERP said:They're missing the point of why rape games are so controversial. I realise that's probably intentional, but still...
so Italy is communistic in the futurelordlee said:henritje said:mm.. VG characthers in politics I wonder how that will work out?
In regards to this, which I've known about for some time, it's one of the key problems I have with rape games in general. For me, it represents a lack of sensitivity.. not sure if that's the right word... It feels like a desensitization of the events depicted. If we were to just see a game of a girl being raped and shrug and move on, that's us no longer caring about it, and that's one step closer to us no longer caring when we see or hear about rape really happening. The reason I say that is because that is exactly the case in Japan. The sheer fact that people DO get dragged off and raped in crowds and no one gives a shit is a serious problem in my eyes. It's one of the major reasons I have a love and hate relationship with Japan and its culture. However, the same can probably be said with a lot of countries out there (and America with its White Slavery and Gang Wars isn't immune, either).Doug said:Honestly? I don't know. In a country where a woman can be dragged off a train, sobbing and begging for help in front of 40 witnesses and raped, I doubt that rape victims really feel like reporting the crime will help.
So we are going to address that people get raped in public in front of crowds in the US too riiiiiiight?Hiroshi Mishima said:This was a clustered quote, so if I have the wrong name attached, I apologize.
In regards to this, which I've known about for some time, it's one of the key problems I have with rape games in general. For me, it represents a lack of sensitivity.. not sure if that's the right word... It feels like a desensitization of the events depicted. If we were to just see a game of a girl being raped and shrug and move on, that's us no longer caring about it, and that's one step closer to us no longer caring when we see or hear about rape really happening. The reason I say that is because that is exactly the case in Japan. The sheer fact that people DO get dragged off and raped in crowds and no one gives a shit is a serious problem in my eyes. It's one of the major reasons I have a love and hate relationship with Japan and its culture. However, the same can probably be said with a lot of countries out there (and America with its White Slavery and Gang Wars isn't immune, either).Doug said:Honestly? I don't know. In a country where a woman can be dragged off a train, sobbing and begging for help in front of 40 witnesses and raped, I doubt that rape victims really feel like reporting the crime will help.
The thing in the game was mildly amusing, but it's side-stepping the issue. If the people who made that game seriously think we're just going on about the rights of game characters, they're either extremely stupid or they're deluding themselves. As much as games cause controversy today over things such as violence, killing, rape, etc... I'll be a lot more uncomfortable when we're no longer sensitive to things like these. I mean playing it in a game is one thing, but going "eh" whenever you hear about it in a real world context is something else. Which as a lot of people in here have said (and online in general) "Nothing surprises me out of Japan anymore", and I dunno I kind of find that sad, because it basically means we know what they do and we look the other way. That's about as bad as being one of those 40 witnesses to someone being raped and doing nothing. If I were a witness to someone being taken away, and there was something I could do, you can damn well bet I would have done whatever I could.
EDIT: As an aside to something I noticed in the comments on the last page, I don't actually think Rape games generally lead to rape in real life (although I'm sure it gives way to sexual fantasies of varying degrees of healthiness), I DO believe that the rape game industry was a by-product or possibly even fueled by the stuff that happens in Japan. Whether it's literal rape or just the stuff that they assume people fantasize about.
EDIT2: Just had kind of a sorta-funny thought.. but all this stuff really can't be helping their population/birth issue, either.
As I pointed out in reply to Doug, there was a case in the U.S. recently of a girl getting gangraped in public, with the crowd not only watching - but some of them joined in. Considering how rape games aren't popular in the U.S., I think calling for a lack of sensitivity due to them is a little bitHiroshi Mishima said:In regards to this, which I've known about for some time, it's one of the key problems I have with rape games in general. For me, it represents a lack of sensitivity.. not sure if that's the right word... It feels like a desensitization of the events depicted. If we were to just see a game of a girl being raped and shrug and move on, that's us no longer caring about it, and that's one step closer to us no longer caring when we see or hear about rape really happening. The reason I say that is because that is exactly the case in Japan. The sheer fact that people DO get dragged off and raped in crowds and no one gives a shit is a serious problem in my eyes. It's one of the major reasons I have a love and hate relationship with Japan and its culture. However, the same can probably be said with a lot of countries out there (and America with its White Slavery and Gang Wars isn't immune, either).
Being sensitive to something has nothing to do with being morally objectionate to a piece of art. Yes. Art. It may not be art you like, but it's still art. It still speaks to the soul in a certain way, just as Lolita is art, the Bible is art and Resident Evil 4 is art.Hiroshi Mishima said:The thing in the game was mildly amusing, but it's side-stepping the issue. If the people who made that game seriously think we're just going on about the rights of game characters, they're either extremely stupid or they're deluding themselves. As much as games cause controversy today over things such as violence, killing, rape, etc... I'll be a lot more uncomfortable when we're no longer sensitive to things like these. I mean playing it in a game is one thing, but going "eh" whenever you hear about it in a real world context is something else. Which as a lot of people in here have said (and online in general) "Nothing surprises me out of Japan anymore", and I dunno I kind of find that sad, because it basically means we know what they do and we look the other way. That's about as bad as being one of those 40 witnesses to someone being raped and doing nothing. If I were a witness to someone being taken away, and there was something I could do, you can damn well bet I would have done whatever I could.
So, wait, are rape games the product of their fantasies or do they produce the fantasies? Surely to consider buying a rape game you'd likely have tendencies to begin with.Hiroshi Mishima said:EDIT: As an aside to something I noticed in the comments on the last page, I don't actually think Rape games generally lead to rape in real life (although I'm sure it gives way to sexual fantasies of varying degrees of healthiness), I DO believe that the rape game industry was a by-product or possibly even fueled by the stuff that happens in Japan. Whether it's literal rape or just the stuff that they assume people fantasize about.