If it is an April fools Joke, well made, if not, well, the guy had it coming a little, kept getting in that guys face though the guys reaction was uncalled for.
Same.Senaro said:I thought this was a story about a bunch of people who decided to beat him up because he was Jar Jar, not because he was being a jerk to random people on the subway.
While I agree that their behaviour isn't OK, we can't expect the best behaviour from everyone. It's naive, unrealistic, and, in this case, pretty dangerous (If it's not an April Fools gag). Yeah, the guys should be charged. Yeah, they were totally, 100% wrong. But you know what? The whole thing could have been avoided completely if the guy backed off and did his bit to someone else. The skit could have went on, no assault.Penitent said:I'd have to reply with a strong no. That'd be treating the attackers as if they had any authority to assault him - they didn't. It doesn't matter how annoying he was, they shoved him to the ground and intended to make an example out of the actor. That is not on.OK, on one hand, it sucks that these guys got assaulted while they were attempting to film a viral improv video. On the other, though, maybe they'll take this as a lesson: when you're getting in the face of a guy who looks like Bruce Willis's angry twin and he repeatedly tells you to get away, maybe you should take his suggestion to heart.