I agree and disagree at the same time. People should research what they buy, and when they do buy something like WarZ or the Guise of the Wolf(not the backers, but people later on), I feel like it's more of a "you reap what you sow" point. It needs to be a half and half system. The industry should control themselves, but gamers too should control themselves and understand what they are buying. I understand mostly that Jim would not address this aspect as much because his is more of the counter argument to an argument already well known, but I still feel the idea where both parties act properly and intelligently is something that should also be advocated. Industry, stop being such cock-heads, but gamers, be weary that plenty of companies are just that. With EA, while they are known for putting out shit some of the time, not all of it is all god awful, so if someone bought SimCity and got pissed about the always on, while I hate always on, they should have known it was there. As for games such as ME3 where the ending pissed people off, that is something else, and people were actually lied to about that(16 endings my ass). I for one actually liked the original ending(it just felt more proper, while the extended cut just felt so happy go lucky and out of place, even if it still made more sense in writing terms), but they still lied about it, and that's bullshit.