The line between "trolling" and "actual shameful belief" is a hard one to judge on the internet. But really, just go browse the comments on other sites when this topic comes up. The Escapist at its worst is milder than a lot of other game news sites at their best.Xanadu84 said:You know, I'm curious.
I agree with Jim, that the gatekeeping and boys club mentality has got to go. And I certainly see subtle problems of guys treating women differently, and judging fellow guys geekiness rather leniently, while applying much more strict tests to females, more frequently, and extrapolating wildly from that. But where exactly are all the guys who actually believe and express a problem with women specifically and openly? Sure, you see an occasional troll, and an occasional poorly written article, but I rarely see a large number of unironic people openly criticizing the whole gender. I always see sexist guys couching there sexism in arguments that seem reasonable on the surface, often times not being discriminatory by being categorically different to women, but by matters of degrees, slightly scoffing at a guy who hasn't played Zelda, and outright exile for a girl who can't name some obscure piece of trivia. Am I lucky, in that I see the problem in its more subtle and nuanced forms? Or is there really hoards of gamers out there with a girls-are-icky mentality, not covering there misogyny with so much as a shred of plausible deniability? And I mean by community, not individuals.
Also, Does anyone else have a video ad for some stupid reality TV show that pops up at the hin of a mouseover, and that blocks half of the text field, making writing a response extremely annoying?
With the lion, or the old man?WaitWHAT said:After this video, I doubt he'll need much persuasion.Imp Emissary said:Wife actually. Got a kid too. Short of.
Also,
well his initial inquiry into gaming was forced which is where the comparison came from. I think he was reaching for a tip but who knows. either way its still not cool to judge people who are trying to fit in even if they fail at it.Silentpony said:Close, but that sounds more like a disagreement of opinion. I mean if you said you like Bioshock: Infinite and said Sonic employee agreed, declaring their undying love for that game, and then you ask "Whats your favorite Vigor?" They look down at their shoes and say "Oh no, these aren't Vigors, they're Nikes." THAT is a example of the Hipster Gamer.rbstewart7263 said:Snip
What I don't get is why Jim is so eager to defend the hipsters? Sure, it doesn't harm us true gamers if some guy or girl says they like something when they really don't, but is that the type of message we want to send? That its okay to lie? That walking around saying things that are blatantly untrue is totally fine so long as whats being said is something we agree with? Where's the line? At what point do we say no they're not just trying to fit in, they're lying and we need to call them on their shit. How would any one of us feel if we met someone who loved Dungeons and Dragons but didn't know what a d20 was? Or loved baseball, but didn't know what that bat thingy was for? Embracing rhese obvious liars strikes me as finding it funny when people posted on their facebook last 4th "Happy 2013 B-day America!" or "Wait wiat, Louie Armstrong played jazz and walked on the moon?!"
Its not cute. I don't care about the attention. Its lying. Its being dumb and we should not reward it.
(Sorry, totally went on a rant after the Snip. My bad)
Y-y-you mean TV is misrepresenting my interests!?Monxeroth said:Meanwhile in the big bang theory....
You have to look for them.Xanadu84 said:You know, I'm curious.
I agree with Jim, that the gatekeeping and boys club mentality has got to go. And I certainly see subtle problems of guys treating women differently, and judging fellow guys geekiness rather leniently, while applying much more strict tests to females, more frequently, and extrapolating wildly from that. But where exactly are all the guys who actually believe and express a problem with women specifically and openly? Sure, you see an occasional troll, and an occasional poorly written article, but I rarely see a large number of unironic people openly criticizing the whole gender. I always see sexist guys couching there sexism in arguments that seem reasonable on the surface, often times not being discriminatory by being categorically different to women, but by matters of degrees, slightly scoffing at a guy who hasn't played Zelda, and outright exile for a girl who can't name some obscure piece of trivia. Am I lucky, in that I see the problem in its more subtle and nuanced forms? Or is there really hoards of gamers out there with a girls-are-icky mentality, not covering there misogyny with so much as a shred of plausible deniability? And I mean by community, not individuals.
Also, Does anyone else have a video ad for some stupid reality TV show that pops up at the hin of a mouseover, and that blocks half of the text field, making writing a response extremely annoying?
Females have been interested in "geek culture" just as long as males have. The person considered the world's first computer programmer was a woman.Therumancer said:The point is that it's an understandable reaction and not something people are just going to shelve in the compatively short time we've seen girls genuinely interested in geek culture.
And you don't think that many women have been shunned and rejected their entire lives? Women only fairly recently got the right to vote, and they are still regularly the victims of domestic violence. For much of history, they have been considered as the property of men.A lifetime of being shunned and rejected does not go away overnight, nor does what decades of social trends have done to the psyche.
Well, that needs to stop, regardless of the underlying cause. The fact that women are frequently beaten by men is not excused if the reason for that beating is male insecurity.The thing is that girls are not being "vetted" out of elitism but as a defensive reaction, something that I think needs to be understood without mockery before you can even seriously address this kind of issue.
No, women are definitely not newcomers to geeky hobbies, or to rejection and abuse. The majority of the people cracking Nazi codes and building aircraft for the Allied forces during WWII were women. And they never got the respect that the men did.It's also not nice, but girls are the comparative newcomers to this arena, and like any newcomers to anything instant acceptance isn't going to happen.
Well, that needs to stop, regardless of the underlying cause. The fact that women are frequently beaten by men is not excused if the reason for that beating is male insecurity.The thing is that girls are not being "vetted" out of elitism but as a defensive reaction, something that I think needs to be understood without mockery before you can even seriously address this kind of issue.
No, women are definitely not newcomers to geeky hobbies, or to rejection and abuse.It's also not nice, but girls are the comparative newcomers to this arena, and like any newcomers to anything instant acceptance isn't going to happen.
You got me, I've never met these so called "fake gamer girls", I don't even think I have met any "fake gamer guys" for that matter. How do you even identify these people from other gamers? is it the clothing? the way they talk? If you ask these "fake" people if they know who Zelda is and they don't, doesn't mean anything...it just tells me they probably haven't played the game not that they are fake. I just don't understand how people are even judging "fakeness", is there some kind of book with rules and regulations I am unaware of that lists things that only "real" gamers would know or do?MortisLegio said:I never understood the "problem" with "girl gamers." I wish I could find a girl who knows anything about gaming or just wanted to play. I mean a girl that like the same things I do would be awesome... near impossible but awesome.