So, uh, both of you failed your parody identification test.millertime059 said:ninjas man, get you every timeMatsVS said:A different, perhaps more radical, solution:
How 'bout we objectify no one, and only place men or women in revealing clothing when it is tangential to exploring their character and/or fits their cultural/geographical background. You know, as in good storytelling that is inclusive and realistic at the same time.
Thanks for being one of the few people to actually notice the point though. you are 100% correct.
pretty much this. i'd MUCH rather have a new season of "a good knights quest" or for Doraelous to come back rather than see this guy every week.Rotting Corpse said:I find it amazing how this guy can talk for minutes on end without saying anything. Escapist, please stop paying this guy, this you guys above him. He's not funny, he doesn't make intelligent points, and he doesn't even say anything. He brings up the points without discussing them. That's twice now I haven't even been able to sit through his whole video.
OhHankMan said:Jim looks too much like some televangelist in the show banner.
I suppose objectification for both genders isn't such a bad idea.
I was going to say. "Um... women for men? Men for women? Pretty certain half those Devil May Cry fanarts are from gay fellas." As a bisexual (and I'm not flaunting that), this weird idea Jim has that "men are for women, women are for men," with seemingly no middleground whatsoever, is... baffling. I can't believe in doing research for this kind of video, he didn't once think, "hold on... pretty certain there are women that like tits, too."cobra_ky said:Has anyone explained homosexuality to Jim Sterling yet? He doesn't seem to realize it exists.
Bullshit. Duke Nukem Forever was parroted throughout the entire thing and he's one of the most objectified men in gaming, if not the most.8bitlove2a03 said:Nobody makes men sexy in gaming