Sonya from mortal Kombat would like to have a word with you. Also, a nice chunk of the DOTA and LoL women may have something to say.
Ellie's as cute as a bug. She'll be smoking hot in her 20s.Steve2911 said:Yeah I too can not think of a single example. I was tempted to say Ellie from that bit where you play as her, but I suppose I'm only not thinking of her as attractive because she's too young for me to see her that way. She is the game's protagonist in my eyes though, but I can't honestly count her when she's only playable for an hour of it.
Want to put that to the test?clinicalPsychologist said:Funny, but Scott Shelby was my favourite character in Heavy Rain, and yeah, (slight spoiler warning)Lightknight said:As such, throwing bloody FPS titles at women may never get the response it does from men, no matter how capable and plain the female protagonist was made. Because God only knows that women strongly desire to play as some ugly chick as their avatar. Just like I desire to play as some fat slob with an asthma problem.[/sarcasmjoke]he is a fat slob with an asthma problem
On another note, even if it maybe is understandable that developers make games with a male audience in mind because that is their biggest audience, I just cannot accept that this argument used in this context always implies that the only thing male gamers want are the same tropes used over and over (both male and female centered) or only hyperattractive women in their games. I think that this assumption is rather sexistic against men.
I think the amount of clothes a character has is definitely relevant. Why there weren't any half-naked male characters? Though the Amazon and Jack are unconventional, they are definitely still attractive. Your 20-30 years old with a body that could go on any playboy or men's magazine.Ukomba said:The amount of cloths the character wears is irrelevant. Jack is covered in tatoo's, with a shaved head, and a terrible personality, she is not conventionally attractive. All her lack of clothing doesn't improved her attractiveness, quite the opposite. The same is true for the Amazon. She's far more muscled than the standard conception of beauty, emphasized by the lack of covering cloths.
Luca is cute, but nerdy isn't traditional attractive, which is the point of the video. If John Marston isn't conventionally attractive (I know women who would disagree with that assessment) neither is Luca.
Shale is a party member, and she has possibly the most interesting back story of any of the characters. She's one of my favorites to use too.
Quina Quen's gender is unknown, and put in there for a joke. e_e
Freya isn't "doing something for a man". At one point she is looking for her lost love, but later she's Defending Her Homeland, then goes for Revenge on Brahne, and finally to save the world. How a character starts out their journey doesn't make that their one driving force the entire time.
You can think what you want I'm sure.
+1Paradoxrifts said:Years of experience playing tabletop role-playing games has led me to the firm conclusion that very few people, male or female, want play games where their characters are considered physically unpleasant in appearance, or even outright repulsive. Even when the physical appearance of their character has little to no bearing on what their character actually gets up to during the game the overwhelming majority of people will make the deliberate choice to play a character of perfectly average physical appearance. This is as evident in the video game industry as it is on the table-top. Characters such as Kratos or Marcus Fenix are not guys who're going to win the title of 'Most Eligible Bachelor Of The Year', but they're definitely not physically ugly by any stretch of the imagination. Even Jim's laughable example of a female dinosaur is still a fairly typical average example of what you'd expect a dinosaur to look like given the graphical limitations at the time of the game's release. If Jim is going to arbitrarily exclude physically-fit women with unmarked faces from contention in his little game of musical chairs , of course all he's going to be left with a long forgotten female dinosaur from the early nineties that nobody still gives a shit about. Apply the same test to male characters and all you'd be left with a proportionately larger pool of cultural detritus.
Have you ever SEEN Sonya? I am amazed police regulations let her get away with that much cleavage.Depulcator said:Sonya from mortal Kombat would like to have a word with you. Also, a nice chunk of the DOTA and LoL women may have something to say.
You just described Pain Wheel.Not G. Ivingname said:Fits perfectly. Hooray for murderous cartoons.Peacock from skull girls.
This may or may not count, depending on what Jim meant by "doing it for a man." Could easily be a deconstruction of this motivation, since she really, REALLY hates being mind @#$^ed into doing what Brain Drain wants.Double from skull girls.
People are having fun arguing over the 'sexy/not sexy' part of your question so I thought I'd talk about the MMO part. The reason he excludes the player created characters from this list is because he's using this to critique the gaming industry writers. A lot of writers are actually pretty good at creating strong "blank canvas" characters. The problem rises when the writers expect a particular gender. They can write decent strong male characters, they can write strong blank characters that could just as easily be a female, but the very second they actually decide that the character HAS TO BE female the writing style changes. She has to falling for a man, she has to have a tortured past, she has to be brutally beaten, tortured, raped, or all three to "build character."Monxeroth said:If looks doesnt matter, why cant women be "attractive" so to speak?
Why is the concept of Saints Row and other types of games such as MMOs completely discarded because theyre our creation not the developers?
Can then only good female characters exist if theyre created by the developer and not the player?
The dwarf is just as unclothed as the Amazon.franksands said:I think the amount of clothes a character has is definitely relevant. Why there weren't any half-naked male characters? Though the Amazon and Jack are unconventional, they are definitely still attractive. Your 20-30 years old with a body that could go on any playboy or men's magazine.Ukomba said:The amount of cloths the character wears is irrelevant. Jack is covered in tatoo's, with a shaved head, and a terrible personality, she is not conventionally attractive. All her lack of clothing doesn't improved her attractiveness, quite the opposite. The same is true for the Amazon. She's far more muscled than the standard conception of beauty, emphasized by the lack of covering cloths.
Luca is cute, but nerdy isn't traditional attractive, which is the point of the video. If John Marston isn't conventionally attractive (I know women who would disagree with that assessment) neither is Luca.
Shale is a party member, and she has possibly the most interesting back story of any of the characters. She's one of my favorites to use too.
Quina Quen's gender is unknown, and put in there for a joke. e_e
Freya isn't "doing something for a man". At one point she is looking for her lost love, but later she's Defending Her Homeland, then goes for Revenge on Brahne, and finally to save the world. How a character starts out their journey doesn't make that their one driving force the entire time.
You can think what you want I'm sure.
I thought this one through and you're right, Lucca deserves a position as strong non-attractive character
So, the list is growing(from the games i've played): Amaterasu, Ellie, Lucca. Shale looks very interesting
Not always. If something is in great supply, and particularly at low cost, people may use that excessively and for less-than ideal purposes, even if they want something better for the job. Or in some cases, people might not even be aware of what alternatives are available, that they might prefer if they were given the option.Rastrelly said:Supply reacts to a fucking demand, not vice versa!
Nah, she just asks that female villains not have their entire personality and look be 'is a sexpot with hints of BDSM'.Metalix Knightmare said:Just wanted to add this, Anita would hate this revelation a bit more than you Jim. She hates seeing women used as villian characters.
It is commonly-accepted "conventional wisdom" that games with female protagonists don't sell, or at least they don't sell as well as they would with male protagonists. It is also commonly-accepted "conventional wisdom" that action films with female protagonists don't sell. This was often justified by citing films such as "Elektra", "Catwoman", or "The Brave One", all ignoring the fact that these films were all terrible. Then "Hunger Games" came out, a genre action film starring a female protagonist that is not overtly sexualized, and it broke box office records.uanime5 said:We're appeasing those who buy our products to encourage them to buy more of our products. Anyone who doesn't buy our products doesn't matter.Pat Hulse said:Entertainment industries are exclusively about appeasement. That's pretty much the entire definition of entertainment. It can be used to enrich lives, sure, but it is first and foremost used to be fun and distracting and give us something to do with our idle time. The better question is who we're appeasing, why we're appeasing them, and how that appeasement would negatively impact the appeasement of others.
The games sell better with a male protagonist, so giving them a female protagonist is effectively reducing the number of sales for no real reason.My argument is simply that unless you can think of a counter-argument, changing a male protagonist in a game whose gender identity is not critical to their character (of which there are many) into a female protagonist whose gender identity is not critical to their character without changing much else would be trivially difficult, have a positive impact on communities who ask for such representation, and wouldn't have a significant negative impact on those who aren't asking for it. In my mind, if doing something is easy and would have a positive effect that outweighs the negative effect by a significant margin, it ought to be a no-brainer. We shouldn't FORCE people to do this, obviously, but there's nothing wrong with attempting to convince people to make this decision voluntarily if they find the arguments compelling and if they want to make work that's accessible to a wider audience.
You've also failed to realise that gender is critical for most characters. It's less believable that a woman would save another woman she's never met or fight hordes of minions in order to defeat their leader even when they're no threat to her.
Also you're a hypocrite, as there's little difference between trying to "convince" people to do something and forcing them to do something. If they don't want to do it then you should respect their decision, rather than complain about it.
Uh don't make this so easy.uanime5 said:Where your source that people want games with ugly women? Also how many people would buy a game they wouldn't normally buy simply because it was more diverse.Tombsite said:Source? Where did you see that "people" do not want more diversity? I've seen quite a few forum threads and opinion pieces stating otherwise.
The Boss may not have the prettiest face in MGS3, but it's still a somewhat attractive face. She also has a fairly nice body and of course gets her tits out at one point in the game. Standard attractive stereotype right there. And of course she isn't the playable character.Daystar Clarion said:![]()
![]()
I like to think that The Boss and Ammy fall into this category.
Have you seen The Boss? She's built like a fucking horse, and Ammy is...
Well she's Ammy!
Frankly I think you need to consider all of the criteria Jim presented in the video and not just the first one.Chessrook44 said:Frankly I agree with those who bring up Amaterasu. Sure she's a very pretty character design (But then the whole game is a very pretty character design) but I don't think she really counts as "Traditionally attractive".
Once again someone has missed the point about attractive. First of all, it's not about what you personally find attractive, it's about whether or not she was designed to be "generically" attractive. Chell is a young girl with a nice curvy body, thus she counts under the attractive stereotype and is disqualified. Then she's disqualified again for having no personality.Andy Shandy said:How about Chell, from Portal? At least in the first one, she was just trying to survive GladOS. And I wouldn't call her particularly attractive in the game.