You're using anecdotal evidence by you saying "I don't complain about the fact that I can't play ____ on my _____ therefore it's not a problem." If you actually care about how irrelevant anecdotal evidence is, don't retort WITH anecdotal evidence, even if asked for it, retort with real evidence.Akalabeth said:Um, hello? He ASKED me for anecdotal evidence so I gave him some. Read the posts.immortalfrieza said:You're accusing people of using anecdotal evidence while also doing the same.
Do you understand why things are made the way they're made?immortalfrieza said:Just because YOU don't give a rat's ass about backwards compatibility doesn't mean that there's no value in it.
If there's a demand for something, it'll be provided. If there's no demand, they won't bother.
Or in other words if backwards compatibility was important to a SIGNIFICANT number of people, the 360 and PS3 would still have it. Because that significant portion of the population would cut into their bottom line. But it doesn't, so they don't care.
The fact that they're abandoning it is pretty much proof that your segment of the market doesn't matter.[/quote]
PS2 was able to play PS1 games, Gamecube was able to play Gameboy and GBA games with a separate attachment that they had clearly planned for in advance, Each new Nintendo handheld since the Gameboy Advance is able to play the previous handheld generation before it, Xbox 360 is able to play some original Xbox games, even if not that well, PS3 was able to play PS2 and PS1 games until they took out the PS2 BC to get the price down, Wii is able to play Gamecube games, WiiU is able to play Wii games...
Uh huh. I'm sure they had backwards compatibiltiy for 3 CONSOLE GENERATIONS STRAIGHT because there's no market in it for them.[/sarcasm]