LaBeouf: It's My Fault Indiana Jones 4 Was No Good

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
As much as I tend to think LaBeouf is a seriously overcredited actor.. It wasn't him this time... It MAY have been the casting director who chose him.. or the writer who decided to even write in a Son (and I assume we're just letting the spoiler that it is his son out of the bag, as it was actually a revelation in the movie iirc)... But those people had seen Transformers, so I can't really blame LeBeouf for being LaBeouf.

But mostly, I think it was the premise of the movie itself.. it didn't need to exist.. The Last Crusade was a fine sendoff for Indiana Jones.
 

CJ1145

Elite Member
Jan 6, 2009
4,051
0
41
Hopeless Bastard said:
Jesus christ I just looked over the thread and the amount of tongue bathing people are giving this worthless fuck is appalling. Hes been the worst part of everything hes ever been in. Not counting his laughable start on disney channel, where he was a piece of rotting corn in a humongous pile of shit. Understandable people would confuse that sharp contrast for talent or ability.
My God, you'd think the man killed your parents, you sad little fuck. If he's such a talentless hack, get up there and do better yourself. That way we can devote threads to how much a pile of shit you are instead.
 

yanipheonu

New member
Jan 27, 2010
429
0
0
He shouldn't take it too hard. He's actually pretty good as a sidekick, I liked him in Constantine. It's just... I doubt anyone could have made his part any better, let's face it.
 

GrinningManiac

New member
Jun 11, 2009
4,090
0
0
I didn't like the monkey-swinging. That was a bit...disney.

Everything else was okay, though.

If I hear a single person complain about the nuclear bomb thing...
 

dragonslayer32

New member
Jan 11, 2010
1,663
0
0
i agree that labeouf is a shitty actor but i dont think he made indiana jones 4 crap, the writer did that. aliens? spaceships? surviving a nuclear blash by hiding in a fridge? come on, loonet tunes are more realistic than thios piece of shit.
 

Danman1

New member
Mar 27, 2009
469
0
0
StarStruckStrumpets said:
He's giving himself a bit of a hard time recently isn't he?

I wonder what's wrong with him...(I can hear you all crying "He's a shite actor" already)
I don't think he's THAT bad. Not as bad as he says he was, I think it's that he's in Spielberg and Bay films, I imagine it's hard not to feel like an ass if you're in one of those.
 

CJ1145

Elite Member
Jan 6, 2009
4,051
0
41
GrinningManiac said:
I didn't like the monkey-swinging. That was a bit...disney.

Everything else was okay, though.

If I hear a single person complain about the nuclear bomb thing...
No, no, let them complain. I want to see how they try to blame it on Shia LaBeouf. Should be fun.
 

GrinningManiac

New member
Jun 11, 2009
4,090
0
0
Xanthious said:
Yeah Crystal Skull wasn't up to par with the first three but it did manage at least to not take a big smelly all encompassing shit on the entire franchise like the Star Wars prequels. Hell, if he REALLY wants to apologize for something why not Transformers 2?
http://uk.movies.ign.com/articles/109/1090073p1.html

He did, but not for the right reasons
 

Tehlanna TPX

New member
Mar 23, 2010
284
0
0
Going to agree with everyone else here on the aliens ruining indie 4. Honestly, I'm not a terribly big fan of Shia but he isn't the worst actor out there. That honor goes directly to Nicholas (imreallyacopplalawl) Cage.

I haven't seen Transformers 2, but it's a Bay film... what more did you expect besides tits and ass and EXPLOSIONS?
 

PhunkyPhazon

New member
Dec 23, 2009
1,967
0
0
Hopeless Bastard said:
PhunkyPhazon said:
I didn't think the movie was bad at all. A couple cringe-worthy moments, but they're not anything that ruined the movie for me.

Nivag the Owl said:
You know what? I've always quite liked the 4th Indiana Jones film. From what I can see, most people criticise the film greatly because of the inclusion of aliens. But you people are forgetting something. The first one has ghosts. GHOSTS. The second one has sacred stones and super powers. The third one has the holy grail, substantial healing holy water and a 900 year old man. But aliens? The only one in the list that's even remotely plausible? That's way over the line! The only other complaint (forgetting the concept and focusing on the execution) is that Harrison Ford is old.
Exactly! People act like the movie was about Indy was fighting off an alien invasion. Thankfully it wasn't. (Though apparently that actually is what George Lucas originally wanted to do...thank god for Spielberg) Also, for all you people who complain about the fridge scene. How is that any more ridiculous then jumping out of an airplane on an inflatable raft and riding it down a mountain?
You're both wrong.

Explain ghosts. Times up, you can't. If they exist they're completely metaphysical instances that can't be quantified or studied. They defy all physical law and everything we know about reality. The idea of an ancient artifact summoning hostile spirits who's entire function is to strike down anyone stupid enough to look upon the artifact is equally unexplainable.

Explain aliens. People from another world. Explain their technology. you will be able to eventually.

Its the midichlorians all over again. Technology/biology is the complete absence of mysticism and mystery. The goal of all -ologies is to quantify and reproduce. While -isms are superstition.
Wow, not much point in a timer if it runs out two seconds after you say "go!", now is there? The original movies all revolved around religion, which means they all have one thing in common: God. Nothing is hard to explain when all you have to do is say "God did it." Which is pretty much exactly what they did in all three movies. (Not quite as much in Temple of Doom, but they certainly don't rule it out, either) And the aliens weren't just from another world, they were from an entirely different dimension. On top of that, they were psychic beings who apparently knew everything. Sure, all these things could be explained eventually (While the other movies can be explained with just one word), but as it stands there is certainly still an aura of mystery concerning where exactly they came from, why they came to earth, what it is they know, and how their psychic powers work.

That, and I really don't get everyone's fascination with -isms anyways. You wanna know what I think of midi-chlorians? I don't care. Why should I? It doesn't make the force any less bad-ass for me, it's just an ultra fancy way of saying "The force is alive in all living things." Alright, granted, it does mean that the force is more alive in some then in others, but is it really that big a deal? Does it truly ruin the force so badly that people can't look past it?
 

Macgyvercas

Spice & Wolf Restored!
Feb 19, 2009
6,103
0
0
I quite liked the movie. Sure, it was a bit strange for the interdimensional traveller to show up at the end, but it's not any more implausable than Temple of Doom.

I'm more pissed at Lucas for Midichlorians than I am for Indiana Jones IV.
 

ThrobbingEgo

New member
Nov 17, 2008
2,765
0
0
The film was cheesy with or without LaBeouf's help. Seems like he's blaming himself to acknowledge that the film was bad, in a roundabout way.
 

jboking

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,694
0
0
Ekonk said:
Personally, I think it was the aliens fault. No hard feelings, LaBeouf.
I have to second this. I thought LeBeouf did fine with what he had. It was the whole aliens thing that got to me. Every other movie deals with a religious artifact...this one deals with aliens. That is where the problem is.