Large Hadron Collider Creates Incredibly Dense Primordial Matter
- Thread starter Tom Goldman
- Start date
i wonder if you dropped a penny-shaped amount of this, the size of a penny, off the Empire State Building, how much damage it would do?
no, scientists say there were aliens.cainx10a said:So we fixed the energy problem? Can we move on to invading alien planets now?A Pious Cultist said:
So, uhh, this stuff then?
and then they ended up killing themselves.
like we might end up doing with this whole 'war' thing we seem to be so fond of.
I'd say you would get a pretty massive earthquake.William MacKay said:
OT: Cool discovery! That machine is really paying off.
oh geeze, you watched that Steven hawking thing on aliens didn't you?William MacKay said:no, scientists say there were aliens.cainx10a said:So we fixed the energy problem? Can we move on to invading alien planets now?A Pious Cultist said:
So, uhh, this stuff then?
and then they ended up killing themselves.
like we might end up doing with this whole 'war' thing we seem to be so fond of.
they said we came CLOSE to nuclear self annihilation, so it's plausible other alien races might do/have done the same. Believe it or not there is quite a ways between something being hypothetically plausible, and something actually happening.
It isn't a liquid, it isn't even made out of protons, electrons and neutrons, like normal atoms, but it ACTS like a liquid.Sporky111 said:
Agnostics and Atheists are the same thing, neither believes in the existence of a deity.Dulcinea said:
The only difference is that agnostics either are misinformed about the two, or are too preoccupied with being politically correct to just take a freaking stance.
and no, agnostics aren't some "I don't know" middle ground. that only applies if you are on the fences between EVERY conceived deity. meaning that you are just as partial to believing in Jesus as you are in the alien lord xenu, or Zeus, Ra, Jupiter, Muhammed and well you get the point.
saying you are agnostic when you are only really considering the two possibilities of either a single religion, or none, and then to act like morally superior snobs to (confessed) full blown Atheists.
that is the true hight of hypocrisy.
and no, we can't prove that a deity doesn't exist. BUT we can show that given our current information the existence of a deity is Very unlikely indeed, especially if we are talking about existing or past religions exclusively. This can be done using a myriad of methods.
That's not to say that my stance wouldn't be open to the possibility of a total turnaround if there was even the SLIGHTEST shred of evidence.
In fact, if this were analogous of a court case. The bible would be practically launched out of the stand by catapult for being such an unreliable witness. It's full of contradictions and tall tales we can all but certainly (going by NOTHING is certain, except for ones own existance) know are false. It spews garbage about the origins of life and man, and tells of worldwide floods which there is NO proof of. why should a good deal of the bible be laughably debunk-able, but we take it on its word about things we CANNOT disprove.
Just arguing about this makes me facepalm at the utter faeces some people scoff as if it were garlic bread.
*final note, not an argument but an observation*
If we began with two people, Adam and Eve, and then they made nasty inbred incest-ness, and then they distilled it to Noah and his small family with a flood and repeated. Did some of noahs grandson/grandson-in-laws have like, 33 toes?
Sooooooo... A dense plasma we just discovered how to make is the universe's version of primordial ooz? Could someone explain to me how one plasma can differentiate into multiple types of solids and gasses? Who knows though. Maybe we are looking at the future's warp core fuel.
Simple concept. If humanity started from two original people, the genetic code would have been very dense and random, much more than today. (Two black-hair people have red-hair baby. Common concept in that case) Ergo, not really. It would be kinda cool to see a guy with that many toes though.RadiusXd said:
"The unique material is 100,000 times hotter than the sun and denser than any known object other than a black hole"
Someone care to explain to me how it didn't crush/melt anyone in its nearby vicinity? Perhaps I'm simply overestimating its size, but I don't see how something that hot and dense could be so easily contained.
Someone care to explain to me how it didn't crush/melt anyone in its nearby vicinity? Perhaps I'm simply overestimating its size, but I don't see how something that hot and dense could be so easily contained.
