Here's a counter: http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/news/Readers-correct-generator-claim/article-2674234-detail/article.htmlChocoFace said:First, let's recite the first rule of thermodynamics, shall we? It says that neither matter nor energy can be created or destroyed. Energy can be changed, moved, controlled, stored, or dissipated, but it cannot be produced from nothing or reduced to nothing. I guess the inventor of this machine didn't learn physics well enough in school, or something.
Dubbed the Alpha Omega Galaxy Freefall Generator, this device uses the power of gravity to produce more electricity than it consumes through perpetual motion.
This is what it looks like. It's mostly made from standard, run-of-the-mill bicycle parts (also the reason it cannot fully be patented) and uses a windscreen-washer motor. The inventor, a Somerset engineer, whose name isn't included in the article, predicts a fully commercial version of this could power a house.
link is here, with some extra clarification and a nifty video, as i'm sure this needs to be seen to be believed.
http://www.infoniac.com/hi-tech/latest-invention-perpetual-motion-device-that-produces-power-from-gravity.html
So, raise of hands - energy crisis solved or not? Also it's name. Just, wow.
It means it essentially becomes a perpetual motion machine that generates electricity for itself and more. The reason it can not fully be patented is not entirely clear, but to me it seems like it uses parts of other patents to create a seemingly simple machine, which it is.Wicky_42 said:Eh, bull. If it was serious, it would be up in a few more mainstream publictions, lol. Also, what is the article on about here?
You can't patent a perpetual motion machine? Why not?!The inventor will not be able to fully patent the Alpha Omega Galaxy Freefall Generator. He will only be able to patent certain parts of the machine. This is because the device claims to be a perpetual motion machine that generates more power than it uses.
It explains nothingBecause it makes electricity, the flywheel become a source of electricity, needing electricity to turn on? What?the machine could generate enough electricity to run a house. Hence the flywheel becomes its own source of electricity but with a slight amount of external input that is needed to turn on the machine.
Besides, with the amount of rocking and shaking that machine was doing it doesn't seem to be the most efficient engine ever. With those sort of losses I can't even BEGIN to imagine that it works.
Oh, that explains a lot. I guess next time i'll look into something more thoroughly.Wicky_42 said:Here's a counter: http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/news/Readers-correct-generator-claim/article-2674234-detail/article.html
It's a flywheel - they store energy, not generate it.
oh i see its a Galileo/Da Vinchi style Perpetual Motion machine. this design and ones almost exactly like it have all been tried. sorryChocoFace said:
You can't patent it because it's using bike parts. He didn't make those bike parts, nor the plans for them.Wicky_42 said:Eh, bull. If it was serious, it would be up in a few more mainstream publictions, lol. Also, what is the article on about here?
You can't patent a perpetual motion machine? Why not?!The inventor will not be able to fully patent the Alpha Omega Galaxy Freefall Generator. He will only be able to patent certain parts of the machine. This is because the device claims to be a perpetual motion machine that generates more power than it uses.
It looks like more of a generator, but it looks like a very clean and safe one.Ampersand said:*sigh* you said it, it uses gravity to produce more electricity then it consumes. It's utilizing acceleration due to gravity and converting the kinetic energy into electricity. I'm sure that very clever but it's not perpetual motion.......this is simple stuff people.
Its not, sorry to rain on your parade. As the article said, anyone who knows and understands physics, knows perpetual motion machines are impossible.WorkerMurphey said:That's neat if it's legit but I find myself skeptical.
It essentially means it's bull - how does it generate energy for itself? By turning? Where's the energy gain there - I can see the losses, from friction in every rotating joint and moving air as well as from moving the elastic drive belt, but no gains.ChocoFace said:It means it essentially becomes a perpetual motion machine that generates electricity for itself and more. The reason it can not fully be patented is not entirely clear, but to me it seems like it uses parts of other patents to create a seemingly simple machine, which it is.Wicky_42 said:Eh, bull. If it was serious, it would be up in a few more mainstream publictions, lol. Also, what is the article on about here?
You can't patent a perpetual motion machine? Why not?!The inventor will not be able to fully patent the Alpha Omega Galaxy Freefall Generator. He will only be able to patent certain parts of the machine. This is because the device claims to be a perpetual motion machine that generates more power than it uses.
It explains nothingBecause it makes electricity, the flywheel become a source of electricity, needing electricity to turn on? What?the machine could generate enough electricity to run a house. Hence the flywheel becomes its own source of electricity but with a slight amount of external input that is needed to turn on the machine.
Besides, with the amount of rocking and shaking that machine was doing it doesn't seem to be the most efficient engine ever. With those sort of losses I can't even BEGIN to imagine that it works.
Keep in mind this is the original build of the device. Obviously it can be improved.
There isn't a single patenting board in the world that will accept to patent PMM unless they see visual and scientific proof by government officials.Jesus Phish said:You can't patent it because it's using bike parts. He didn't make those bike parts, nor the plans for them.Wicky_42 said:Eh, bull. If it was serious, it would be up in a few more mainstream publictions, lol. Also, what is the article on about here?
You can't patent a perpetual motion machine? Why not?!The inventor will not be able to fully patent the Alpha Omega Galaxy Freefall Generator. He will only be able to patent certain parts of the machine. This is because the device claims to be a perpetual motion machine that generates more power than it uses.
I'd be very interested to see if this is real or not. I'd love to see some more proof of it and what kind of output of energy it gives.
It looks like more of a generator, but it looks like a very clean and safe one.Ampersand said:*sigh* you said it, it uses gravity to produce more electricity then it consumes. It's utilizing acceleration due to gravity and converting the kinetic energy into electricity. I'm sure that very clever but it's not perpetual motion.......this is simple stuff people.