Simply because they want to control whats not always within their grasp.vivalahelvig said:Do the anti-game law makers know that the video game industry is a HUGE part of the economy, because there is alsmost always a market for them, AND that that would erase the need for nvidia and other thingy thingy makers, killing jobs, and letting xbox live users get out on the streets to cause more chaos.
Hmm good point. I miss a good story in games. Its all so overly action based now days.Doomed Prophet said:Wow. A lot of you must have shins of steel from all the knee jerk reactions. The lawyer, if you noticed, works for the gaming companies so he?s going to make it sound like ?doom and gloom? if the Supreme Court agrees and upholds the Californian law. It?s called ?spin?. It?s a bit sad that the gaming industry subscribes to the ESRB but does nothing, and I do mean NOTHING, to enforce it. Since 1994 the gaming industry has been classifying its games, putting that rating at the beginning of their adverts, and happily peddling their violence to anyone with money. They should be behind the movement, since forcing their distributors to enforce the ESRB ratings is better than banning a game outright.
Gamers are just up in arms because they want their violence fix. Stores being forced to enforce those ratings will be doing the same thing that movie theaters have done since 1968, and they?re still a thriving business. It won?t hurt internet sales in any way. The development companies will still churn out the games you?ve grown to know and love.
It is a bit sad to realize how low the industry has sunk. There used to be a time when overtly violent games were few and far between, but now days it?s the opposite.
Before you break out your flame throwers: I work in the gaming industry and I really don?t see the point of games that substitute violence for story.
oh yeah right, since when has that ever happened? look at the stupid ***** that is blaming farmville for making her kill her kid, if it was neglect it might be something, still stupid as hell but something. But no shes blaming it for making her shake the shit out of the kid when it was cryingMaxPowers666 said:You know I kind of want this law to actually get passed. Then once it does all those paranoid idiots might actually shut about once they realise that absolutely nothing has changed. Ah hell who am I kidding they will still try to blame the law even though it doesnt actually change anything.
In fact it may actually help the industry. People can no longer simply blame video games for violence among children they will have to blame the parents because it will be illegal for the kids to actually buy the games.
Though i would hate to lose my Xbox live it would be great knowing that an end would be put to those spawn camping, tea bagging foul mouthed idiots.. and also the Halo fanboys.Paularius said:If it passes would it put an end to loud mouth yobs on xbox live?
Hoping it wont pass. Just looking for a silver lining.
Also Halo would probably lose half its player base.
Well this IS the US government. They tend to go overboard when it comes to stuff like this. Just look at the comic industry a decade or so ago.Sovvolf said:If that's true then well, that's also how it goes in Briton and as been like this for as long as I can remember so... I don't see the big deal.Thumper17 said:Uhm, as far as I know. The law they are talking about just means violent videogames wont be able to legally be sold to minors. They do that in Canada already. Nothing has changed.
People need to calm down.
Its a chain reaction. First it becomes no way to sell to minors. Then its no ads on TV. Next its no ads in Magazines. Then, Prices of games shoot up before they slowly dwindle away.Thumper17 said:Uhm, as far as I know. The law they are talking about just means violent videogames wont be able to legally be sold to minors. They do that in Canada already. Nothing has changed.
People need to calm down.
TOTALLY different from the Comic Code Authority. Remember this law is for the State of California only, for the moment. This law will not affect the country of USA as a whole, but a single part of it. Now we have around 11 states backing up the law. So if the law passes we have the chance of having 11+ states with 11+ views of what is appropriate as a video game. So do you believe that developers want to make 11+ versions of a single game?Sniper Team 4 said:We are very protective of our First Amendment rights, although I agree with both of you. My store already doesn't allow minors to buy M-rated games, so it wouldn't really be any different. There's also the fact that, so far, this would only be in California, not the other 49 states. Naturally, the fear is that it will expand beyond California. There's also the fact that no other form of media is regulated this way (movies, music, books--and porn doesn't count), so it is a bit unfair.
If this does pass, I think it will be like what happened to comic books several decades ago. Eventually, it will just blow over. If it doesn't pass, then the bright spot is that we will have heard the end of this nonsense.
Oh, it WILL change. As said the law has the potential of allowing each state to have their own laws that regulate what is acceptable in video games. Its not about preventing the kids from playing games, its about the game developers even thinking they can try to compensate for each states individual laws.mattttherman3 said:The law wouldn't change a thing. Just peoples parents will get them the game, and since 80% of stores doesn't sell to minors, this is already happening, therefore, nothing will change.
What? Supreme Court is generally pretty good about these things. It seems like you are immediately assuming its a bad thing because it has to do with government.Commander Breetai said:*collapses laughing*SomethingAmazing said:Supreme court is full of sensible people, I am pretty sure that they will shoot this down.
I'll start by saying I do agree with your point about story over violence.Doomed Prophet said:-Snip-
A fact that most people seem to forget. I have faith that they will see the light. SCOTUS is not your typical US government body. If any part of the government has some degree of sense, it would be these guys. If they do uphold this law, then people can truly say that the US is screwed because it will have lost the last part of sanity that it still has in its positions of power.SomethingAmazing said:Supreme court is full of sensible people, I am pretty sure that they will shoot this down.
Bioware is Canadian.Lillowh said:-snip-
Heeeyy, I'm Canadian.unabomberman said:Darn.
That's all I can say. The U.S keeps letting me down. At least Canada's still there...okay, bad joke.