Let the incest begin!
- Thread starter Daystar Clarion
- Start date
Recommended Videos
how dare nature do thatDaystar Clarion said:
you are officially a moron, there is SUPPOSED to be an evolutionary safeguard involved here, it doesn't matter that the baby isnt from the two of them, there is something wrong with their psychology that is allowing them to be "in love" with each other, instinct doesn't identify the fine conditions of it not actually being their baby, geniusShpongled said:
also, shpongled confirmed for gran lover.
Incest: Fun for all the family
Aren't there laws against this in New Zealand? Besides, that kid is going to be fucked up.
Aren't there laws against this in New Zealand? Besides, that kid is going to be fucked up.
Ok, my faith in humanity just dropped again. It's going down by at least fifty points a day now... THIS IS NOT GOOD.
Since the kid isn't theirs, it doesn't freak me out as much... But STILL. Dude. Your own GRANDMOTHER? *shudder*
I'm reminded of Oedipus Rex. Except he didn't actually know it was his mother...
Since the kid isn't theirs, it doesn't freak me out as much... But STILL. Dude. Your own GRANDMOTHER? *shudder*
I'm reminded of Oedipus Rex. Except he didn't actually know it was his mother...
My faith in humanity from the article and Plus some people in the thread -9000. (<------- its over 9000)
A lot of things make people qualified to be called fucking uptight prudes. Being disapproving of a sexual relationship between a grandma and her grandson is not one of them. I believe this relationship is wrong because intercourse between family members is absolutely unnecessary. There are more than 6 billion on this planet that aren't related to each other so there is no reason for anyone to date inside their own family tree. I feel that this relationship is based on something mentally(or physically) wrong with these people.WolfMage said:
Wrong.
But I'm not disgusted.
Geneticly speaking it's terrible for future evolution, but it's a drop in the bucket.
But I'm not disgusted.
Geneticly speaking it's terrible for future evolution, but it's a drop in the bucket.
I have three things to say.
1.)in thee end, all we are is just pink monkeys.
we got to where we are because we were willing to kill everything else to become kings of the world.
animals sometimes mate with thier parents, so it is of no surprise to me that some humans do as well.
2.) meh, whatever floats yer boat, s'all good.
(I apologise for saying this third one, but ill never get another opportunity to say this again)
3.)Incest may be wrong to most, but it is fun for the whole family.
1.)in thee end, all we are is just pink monkeys.
we got to where we are because we were willing to kill everything else to become kings of the world.
animals sometimes mate with thier parents, so it is of no surprise to me that some humans do as well.
2.) meh, whatever floats yer boat, s'all good.
(I apologise for saying this third one, but ill never get another opportunity to say this again)
3.)Incest may be wrong to most, but it is fun for the whole family.
http://local-static0.forum-files.fobby.net/forum_attachments/0003/9774/lex-luthor-wrong1.jpgDaystar Clarion said:
The way a surrogate mother works is that you take take the fertilized egg and implant it into the uterus of a third party. It's still the genetic decendant of those two sick fucks, so it is still inbreeding.
There are two kinds of people saying it's alright
1) Morons going for shock value, often classified as "Trolls" of the genus Trollus.
2) These are the people who are actually gonna try to reinforce their points. These pathetic individuals who have had no actual romantic contact, let alone sexual experiance, possibly due to being fat, having neckbeards, and a vapid absence of personality. The only experiance these people have ever and likely will ever get in through a screen, giving them a high level of perversion that intermingles with their bitterness from a lack of actual romantic contact.
Given their pathetic failure of a social life, what they're doing is making an attempt to justify their pathetic status in the manner of a 7 year-old losing a game: By claiming the rules are unfair.
(I haven't been able to classify these people: The closest point of relation I can think of is Otaku narutard. Anyone have any ideas?)
I never thought it possible but you win the best and worst joke of the thread.NoblePhilistineFox said:
Wait, so the kid's (assuming male) gonna be HER great-grandson AND son, while it'll be HIS son AND uncle?...>_O I think I just broke my brain
Meh couldn't care less. Personally, whilst not even slightly interested in partaking of it with my sisters (you haven't seen them) I would quite happily support a relationship between two relatives as long as no child is born of the union, but then I think that noone should be allowed to have a child unless they've had proper parenting education and are licenced to do so.
Whenever I'm confronted by this kind of thing my response is give it time. I firmly believe that in the future, todays "taboos" will become tomorrows non-issues. I still expect the thousand paedophile march to happen or something, so incest is small beans to how I see the world of tomorrow.
Whenever I'm confronted by this kind of thing my response is give it time. I firmly believe that in the future, todays "taboos" will become tomorrows non-issues. I still expect the thousand paedophile march to happen or something, so incest is small beans to how I see the world of tomorrow.
