Kopikatsu said:
J4RD said:
Finally. I hope Anon joins in on this. Moral of this story: just because you can, doesn't mean it's funny.
A bunch of different Anonymous splinter groups (Including AnonOps) joined up with LulzSec.
Moral of the story? Hackers are bad. All of them. Even the white hats, because without hackers, we wouldn't NEED white hats.
Eh. You could say the same thing about armies.
We wouldn't need armies if other countries didn't have them.
The point being, you need a soldier to deal with other soldiers effectively, and it seems fairly intuitive that taking down hackers is easiest for other hackers.
That's not to say it's a good idea. But the basic principle makes sense.
Still, I'm not surprised Lulzsec is now under attack.
Hackers are frequently elitist, and have a great disdain for 'script kiddies'.
I have no idea how skilled any of the members of Lulzsec actually are, but they're clearly doing things that are quite certain to piss off any hacker that has even a slight sense of ethics, or perhaps just a sense of self-preservation.
The last thing you really want as a hacker, no matter how good you are, is a government witch hunt because some semi-skilled retards have been openly pissing off and mocking governments and large corporations.
Hackers weren't originally criminals. The word used to refer to the system administrators of unix computers. (who frequently hacked together code that wasn't really designed to work together all that well).
Some of the ethos of that origin still survives, even if most people now associate being a hacker strictly with breaking into other people's computers without permission.
(which really didn't have much to do with it's original meaning.)