Yes, god forbid you take into account another point of view from your own. I especially find this funny because Treblaine was actually using facts to defend his position as well as making a valid point about the distinction between correlation vs. causation. He was actually making a reasonable argument and you dismiss him for being American. The comment is especially funny because, based on previous posts, I'm pretty sure Treblaine isn't even from the US.veryboringfact said:Delusibeta said:Thanks for reminding me why I hate discussing US politics, Treblaine.
(And yes, I realise what the response [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gb0oP2Jcl-M&l#t=0m35s] and the ensuring conversation to this will probably be).
Discussing US politics is OK so long as the person you are discussing it with isn't from the US
[Emphasis added]First you lump in the entire western hemisphere with your own belligerant nation, then you are so politically insensitive as to imply the only possible attack more horrible than what happened to the US 9 years ago is precisely what the US did to someone else 65 years ago.
LOL. As I said, I'm pretty sure Treblane is from the UK. Perhaps you should make sure you have all the facts before making wild assumptions about people.
Besides, how the fuck does saying that a nuclear attack would be worse then 9/11 have anything to do with Hiroshima and Nagasaki? It would be worse. It's not like he said it would be worse then Hiroshima or Nagasaki or that a nuclear attack now would be the worst thing ever. That I can see you taking offense at, but saying that a nuclear attack (on a major population center) would be worse then 9/11 is just a fact.