Again you use the word murderers, you don't know what that word means clearly, and you lessen the meaning of it by applying it incorrectly.Saelune said:It worries me that you are condoning his posts then, but fine.Basement Cat said:No, he isn't.Saelune said:There have been times where I have been on the side with most of the people agreeing against one person, and I do usually think "Everyone else thinks you're wrong so you probably are" but I dont say it cause...thats bullshit. Just because a majority of people agree on something, doesnt make it right, case in point most Civil Rights issues. And plus you are only going on right now. Silvanus, undeadsuitor, bastardofmelbourne and others tend to be on the same page as me on this topic. Just because they arent here right now defending me or disagreeing with you doesnt mean they suddenly change their mind.Warhound said:Funny I had time to do both, never too late for you to learn, but I suspect you have 0 interest in actually learning, you just want to reinforce your own strange world views, eh? After all you just got told you were wrong by several people and your responce is "NAH NAH NAH YOU ARE ALL WRONG."Saelune said:I was too busy building a respect for innocent lives, not metal weapons of death.Warhound said:Well, you are sure of your views because you have a fantasy version of reality.Saelune said:You were a cop? Considering how you act, I only feel more sure of my views.Warhound said:Except this comes from ex-military and police officers who have served over 20 years. Where as your line of thinking comes from some imagination land. Go talk to an armed police officer from the UK, they will tell you the exact same thing.Saelune said:This is the worst line of thinking ever. Please, never go near a firearm.Warhound said:The only time you shoot is shooting to kill. If you think there are other options you don't draw the gun, or put it away. You never shoot to wound, you never try to leg someone.
But no, I wasn't a cop, I just took firearm training classes as a teen and an adult so I had a proper respect for the tools I was inheriting from my parents. You should take one as well since you don't understand the basics of what you are talking about.
And what of your responses? You are very rude and directly insulting.
In fact I find myself agreeing with him. You're unfamiliar with firearms--nothing wrong with that--but in addition to hating firearms in general you ooze contempt and disgust over those who wield them and/or are trained to handle them.
I hate the idolization of deadly weapons by so many here. I ooze contempt and disgust over murderers who get away with it because of unreasonable worship of organizations that repeatedly fail to uphold the law they are supposed to enforce and defend, as well as for the people who outright defend them on flimsy and unfair reasoning. Why is it ok for cops, people with guns and supposed training, to kill out of fear and cowardice, but its not ok for an innocent person to fumble in fear when yelled at by said gun toting monsters? I believe that is the definition of a double standard.
I think gun nuts are far too biased in their idol worship that they lack objective thinking and outright dismiss anyone who doesnt fall in line with their deadly thinking.
The douche in the charger who ran people over at a nazi rally? THATS a murderer.
A cop who makes a split second judgment call and is wrong? Still wrong, but not a murderer.
Also its laughable that you call everyone else biased and lacking objectivity and then call people cowards, idol worshipers. You say they have 'supposed training' yet you, someone who has never seemingly been in the same room as a firearm, can't even respect the very basic rule of firearms, that you don't point it at anything you don't want to die/destroy AND endorse the cops shooting at people's legs and arms to disable them.