I...you...but...right...yet wrong...but...tolerance...AGHHHHHHMaladjusted said:I was going to say (in agreement with the OP) that I also find the pre-emptive anger against ME3 (or indeed any other UNRELEASED game/film/novel) to be mystifying, bordering on surreal. After all, how often, have people been right about something entirely on the basis of its initial, pre-release promotional material? Didn't Global Geekdom drool over the Star Wars Episode I trailers only to find out the, unsurprising truth, that you can project a lot on to a trailer (good or bad)that turns out not to meet with your experience of the actual product. Hasn't every beloved nerdy thing (from "A Game of Thrones" to the "Lord of the Rings films") been greeted with cries of 'they're ruining it/I can't BELIEVE they've cast a natural brunette/have you seen their DESPERATELY impoverished vision of Storm Warden's Castle/Cat/Skin-tight Leather Jump suit/accent....
Anyway. That was the kind of thing that I was -going- to say. But then I had a minor epiphany. Skimming down the responses, as is my wont, I started to think: but, seriously would I really want things to be any different? I mean, imagine if people -didn't- complain about unreleased games (or whatever) based solely on the promotional material, injudicious applications of their imagination and some dim memories of whenever they were last disappointed enough to consider making another video in which Hitler rants out their rage in false subtitles. I mean, if we didn't do things like this, would this really be the forum of a gaming website anymore?
If we DIDN'T howl with horror at the imminent (if mostly imaginary) desecration of What-used-to-be-our-favourite-things-but-probably-isn't-now-that-they're-about-to-fuck-it-up would we really be exhibiting that sense of proportion for which "gamers" and geek culture aficionados generally are so renowned?
If we didn't take these opportunities to showcase our sobriety, wouldn't we be in danger of a massive drop in nerdy street cred? And if -that- happened, what would be the consequences?!?
Wouldn't it be the beginning of the end? Wouldn't we wake to a world taken over by football players and surfer dudes?
Where would someone go, if they wanted to imply that no lover of Planescape: Torment could ever love Planescape: torment as deeply, madly and truly as s/he did. Where would we (not to mention -I-) go to procrastinate in a way that makes other kinds of procrastination seem assiduous? Can't we just take a deep breath, put our arms around each other and say: "people, dear, dear, people. We're all nerds here. If we weren't we wouldn't be posting, let alone posting about posting like I am right now.
And isn't that a reason for solidarity, even (cough) love? Can't we then say that as nerds, each and everyone of us cares about various pop cultural products to a degree to which all kinds of other people will (for good or bad reasons) find absolutely incomprehensible And isn't one of our ways of dealing with this -- our most sacred ritual -- to reserve the right to enter into endless arguments with each other about whether something that purports to be a continuation of something which we once loved will be either a) even better than the last time -- an amazing escape from the otherwise ineluctable law of Diminishing Returns or B) a stab in the back, a Judas-like betrayal in which precious dreams are spat upon before they are shattered.
Put differently: whichever side we choose in this kind of non-argument: doesn't the fact of choosing a side mean -- wait for it! -- that we're all on the same side in the end?
Nerd Power, people!
Tears and hopefully hugs.
Love,
M.
The definition of awesome posts just got re-defined. I lift my hat to thee, sir.Maladjusted said:I was going to say (in agreement with the OP) that I also find the pre-emptive anger against ME3 (or indeed any other UNRELEASED game/film/novel) to be mystifying, bordering on surreal. After all, how often, have people been right about something entirely on the basis of its initial, pre-release promotional material? Didn't Global Geekdom drool over the Star Wars Episode I trailers only to find out the, unsurprising truth, that you can project a lot on to a trailer (good or bad)that turns out not to meet with your experience of the actual product. Hasn't every beloved nerdy thing (from "A Game of Thrones" to the "Lord of the Rings films") been greeted with cries of 'they're ruining it/I can't BELIEVE they've cast a natural brunette/have you seen their DESPERATELY impoverished vision of Storm Warden's Castle/Cat/Skin-tight Leather Jump suit/accent....
Anyway. That was the kind of thing that I was -going- to say. But then I had a minor epiphany. Skimming down the responses, as is my wont, I started to think: but, seriously would I really want things to be any different? I mean, imagine if people -didn't- complain about unreleased games (or whatever) based solely on the promotional material, injudicious applications of their imagination and some dim memories of whenever they were last disappointed enough to consider making another video in which Hitler rants out their rage in false subtitles. I mean, if we didn't do things like this, would this really be the forum of a gaming website anymore?
If we DIDN'T howl with horror at the imminent (if mostly imaginary) desecration of What-used-to-be-our-favourite-things-but-probably-isn't-now-that-they're-about-to-fuck-it-up would we really be exhibiting that sense of proportion for which "gamers" and geek culture aficionados generally are so renowned?
If we didn't take these opportunities to showcase our sobriety, wouldn't we be in danger of a massive drop in nerdy street cred? And if -that- happened, what would be the consequences?!?
Wouldn't it be the beginning of the end? Wouldn't we wake to a world taken over by football players and surfer dudes?
Where would someone go, if they wanted to imply that no lover of Planescape: Torment could ever love Planescape: torment as deeply, madly and truly as s/he did. Where would we (not to mention -I-) go to procrastinate in a way that makes other kinds of procrastination seem assiduous? Can't we just take a deep breath, put our arms around each other and say: "people, dear, dear, people. We're all nerds here. If we weren't we wouldn't be posting, let alone posting about posting like I am right now.
And isn't that a reason for solidarity, even (cough) love? Can't we then say that as nerds, each and everyone of us cares about various pop cultural products to a degree to which all kinds of other people will (for good or bad reasons) find absolutely incomprehensible And isn't one of our ways of dealing with this -- our most sacred ritual -- to reserve the right to enter into endless arguments with each other about whether something that purports to be a continuation of something which we once loved will be either a) even better than the last time -- an amazing escape from the otherwise ineluctable law of Diminishing Returns or B) a stab in the back, a Judas-like betrayal in which precious dreams are spat upon before they are shattered.
Put differently: whichever side we choose in this kind of non-argument: doesn't the fact of choosing a side mean -- wait for it! -- that we're all on the same side in the end?
Nerd Power, people!
Tears and hopefully hugs.
Love,
M.
Actually, I was just being sarcastic.SurfinTaxt said:Obnoxious Fanboyism isnt really a reasonable or effective way of getting your point acrossTD_Knight said:snip
While I have no problem with people who just plain don't like the games, I am downright puzzled by people who suggest that the series is going downhill.Ares Gandhi said:I think most of the people who complain about where the ME series is headed - myself included - are simply disappointed that a universe that showed so much promise and steady direction in the first game has gradually lost its way, becoming a jumbled caricature of what it used to be.
What are my problems then? Increasingly sloppy writing, including plot holes and dissatisfying overall plots (ME2 suffered of this to an extent, but Arrival gets the prize for the worst writing yet); deconstruction of the commendably mature approach to sex in the first game, and its replacement with an over-emphasis on romances and nonsensical oversexualization of characters, something only a prepubescent boy would consider "mature". Most of all, the "streamlining" of most elements - gameplay and story - to "appeal to a broader audience.
Bioware fanboyism? Really?SurfinTaxt said:Yes I realize that, thats what makes it obnoxious bioware fanboyismTD_Knight said:Actually, I was just being sarcastic.SurfinTaxt said:Obnoxious Fanboyism isnt really a reasonable or effective way of getting your point acrossTD_Knight said:snip
I have the sneaking suspicion that some people would prefer a clumsy RPG rather than a shooter with RPG elements, even if the latter worked better and was more fun/challenging, so that they can jump on the 'everything's now a shooter BAWWWW' train.Zhukov said:Same goes for this notion of "streamlined" gameplay. ME1 did not have complex gameplay. It had unpolished cover-based shooting, terrible AI and simple RPG elements with a clumsy inventory interface. I say this a lot, but the skills and equipment were simply a matter of making numbers get bigger. Adding +2 to decryption, swapping a shotgun with 110 damage for one with 130 damage, swapping a heat sink II for a heat sink III. In ME2, for all its simplification, at least you had to choose between a warp ability that affected more targets or one that did more damage and between a powerful slow-firing pistol with scarce ammo or a weaker one with plentiful ammo.
Care to back that up with some reasoning or examples there sir?SurfinTaxt said:Face it, story took a back seat in ME2...