I think this idea really has been presented too late. As has been said multiple times, no access to tickets severely limits who can attend, not to mention tickets weren't cheap anyways. Plus there's the geography to consider.
So think about it this way:
MOST of the people you're asking to contribute money (most of your fanbase), has neither the way to get physically to the event OR the ability to buy a ticket to go (because they aren't available.) You're asking people to pay solid money for something most of them cannot attend. Under these circumstances, how is this not a donation?
Also there's the matter many will simply not consider it a good value for money (like myself.) There's also the question of why the escapist (being a gaming news company) couldn't afford to go to PAX with the money it makes from its numerous revenue sources (multiple types of ads, captchas, etc.) It seems to me that something could have been worked out (I know from firsthand accounts from things individuals who work here have posted that not everybody is starving/has trouble affording things) for your employees to maybe pay part or most of their ticket if they wanted to go.
In short, people gave generously when Allison had her hand thing because it was for a worthy cause. Most of the escapist's members can't benefit much from this PAX merchandise bit being introduced so late, so it's practically a donation thing for them. I think under these circumstances it's unsurprising to see resistance to this idea. YES, you're giving them merchandise, but is it a good value for money? If the value is the merchandise itself, probably not. If it's the escapist's staff going to PAX, then maybe, but again that seems like a donation situation, despite protestations to the contrary.
So think about it this way:
MOST of the people you're asking to contribute money (most of your fanbase), has neither the way to get physically to the event OR the ability to buy a ticket to go (because they aren't available.) You're asking people to pay solid money for something most of them cannot attend. Under these circumstances, how is this not a donation?
Also there's the matter many will simply not consider it a good value for money (like myself.) There's also the question of why the escapist (being a gaming news company) couldn't afford to go to PAX with the money it makes from its numerous revenue sources (multiple types of ads, captchas, etc.) It seems to me that something could have been worked out (I know from firsthand accounts from things individuals who work here have posted that not everybody is starving/has trouble affording things) for your employees to maybe pay part or most of their ticket if they wanted to go.
In short, people gave generously when Allison had her hand thing because it was for a worthy cause. Most of the escapist's members can't benefit much from this PAX merchandise bit being introduced so late, so it's practically a donation thing for them. I think under these circumstances it's unsurprising to see resistance to this idea. YES, you're giving them merchandise, but is it a good value for money? If the value is the merchandise itself, probably not. If it's the escapist's staff going to PAX, then maybe, but again that seems like a donation situation, despite protestations to the contrary.
Exactly. Yahtzee has on numerous occasions both here and elsewhere stated that he's basically swimming in a pool of money and has no money worries. Good for him, he deserves it. But really, forget about him asking me for money. I should be hitting him up for a loan.TypeSD said:I'm part of the Pub Club. I paid because $20 isn't much to support a website that I spend a lot of time on. Also it removes ads. However, I clearly remember Yahtzee going on about his massive new 3DTV that he got from internet revenue, so from that three second phrase alone, I decided that he can pay for his own damned business class ticket to PAX.