I might be mistaken but I don't think still counts as a kind of motion. Motion is like an exponential decay. It comes extremely close (infinitely so) to 0 but never reaches it.loodmoney said:Well, if you squint, the bloom of the explosion in the lower right (where the orange robot is) kind of looks like a boobie. And it's a still, which is the slowest kind of motion there is.Druyn said:Thats obviously fake. There aren't nearly enough explosions for that to be a Michael Bay movie. Also, I noticed a distinct lack of slow motion boobies.Ranorak said:Oh, I think I spotted them
![]()
That $25 000 is as good as yours, Ranorak.
I think.
I dunno.
I never saw the originals and didn't enjoy it.dogstile said:It does if the person you're talking to doesn't ignore what is said in the film itself.TheRealCJ said:Please stop trying to justify anything that happens in Bayformers. It doesn't work.Latinidiot said:Of course they are stereotypes. The robots learned everything they know from the internet. Hell, there even was this medic-bot yelling YOU WANT A PIECE OF ME HUH? COE AT ME BRO!
God forbid the autobots have spent too much time on memebase.
I honestly don't understand the hate. Its a film about robots fighting and crude humour. It is in no way canon. Which means fans of the originals need to get over it.
The camera work was terrible and the primary focus was on a series of extremely dry human characters.
It was a demonstrable hack job whose success I believe only came along because of the name drop. Had it been called "RoboCombat" or some other unknown name it would have done only moderately well at best.
Michael Bay is a fantastically terrible director whose works do well despite him and not because of him.