Wow it's word for word digital Atlas Shrugged. Rand may be a bit nuts, but if Rearden makes a better metal, you can't really just take it, you could always make a better one though, eh Microsoft?
That would be awesome. Please let it happen.TheEvilCheese said:I hope Google Counter-Claims against Internet Explorer. That'd be some poetic justice right there.
Aren't you replying as well?Nohra said:And all of the people replying fail to understand why we have antitrust laws in the first place.
Apparently you don't remember back before every browser had a built-in search bar and Google bundled their own toolbar with virtually everything, including several non-Google products. I do. They mostly stopped when Chrome came out; now they just put ads for Chrome on every page of every site they own.Elijin said:I find this amusing since the few times I've used Bing, its layout is so identical to Google that I thought I was using Google.
Also I'd be able to care more if Bing didnt keep setting itself to default search and installing its toolbars with other unrelated microsoft products. Hint, I dont like you Bing, because you try force yourself onto me.
You do realize that "giving a shit" about the LAW isn't exactly optional, right? Even for a company as big as Microsoft. They might be able to kick a little company like Netscape to the curb, but not the entire entertainment industry.Wicky_42 said:With regards to Google blocking/frustrating access to YouTube, they might well have a point, but honestly with the sorts of anti-competitive shit Microsoft's been up to in the past they can fuck off and make their own video hosting site and block Google from accessing it (lol, gl with thatAfter all, there's a market for a video hoster that doesn't give a shit about copyright - maybe that's a niche they could look at exploiting?
![]()
I'm confused - were you on Google's side the first time then? Lol, seems like you're playing both fieldsSteve the Pocket said:A lot of talk about irony in this thread. I recall Google bitching that Microsoft shouldn't be allowed to have a file search feature in its own operating system because it was unfair to Google's Desktop Search app. Same shit-flinging, different side. Anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws are a good idea, but in practice the companies that use them tend to sound like kids squabbling in the back seat of their parents' car.
...
You do realize that "giving a shit" about the LAW isn't exactly optional, right? Even for a company as big as Microsoft. They might be able to kick a little company like Netscape to the curb, but not the entire entertainment industry.
OK, this right here? Needs to stop. This attitude that we're supposed to be playing favorites for some reason instead of calling 'em as we see 'em. I've seen shades of it in this thread already, and I'm sick of it.Wicky_42 said:I'm confused - were you on Google's side the first time then? Lol, seems like you're playing both fields![]()
I was talking about the "video site that doesn't give a shit about copyright" thing.Wicky_42 said:I'm not "not giving a shit about the LAW", I'm saying I don't give a shit about Microsoft's bitching because it's likely petty, founded on half-truths and could even just be a play for more publicity for their search engine!
exactly, you can't sue the competition because you suck.Enkidu88 said:Maybe Bing can't compete because it's complete crap? Just a thought Microsoft.