Is this a joke? Honestly, this is the pot calling the kettle black. The reason people use google over Bing is because Bing isn't very good. Improve or die, Microsoft (I never thought I'd type that sentence).
Nice to see that someone actually gets it.Callate said:You know, I was really ready to dismiss it for the same reasons many of the other posters have- Microsoft? Complaining about someone else's monopoly? Filing an anti-trust suit? Yeah, it sounds like a joke.
But, reading over the article- Microsoft kind of has a point.
When MS was getting its own rear end handed to it in court, it was largely over bundling its browser with its ubiquitous operating system. Since then, there's been a massive expansion of the browser market, and a lot more consumer choices. Heck, I have three web browsers installed on my computer right now, not counting the ones on my consoles.
When you move forward to today, the market has changed considerably. Yes, MS is still the OS king, but an increasing number of people are accessing the Web with smartphones instead, and one of the major web browsers people are using comes from the Web's reigning king, Google.
Now, yes, Google is a great search engine. I even like a lot of what Chrome has to offer. That doesn't mean I feel they should have a right to lock other competitors out of their services, or that I trust them so wholeheartedly that I don't think they should have any competition in their (expanding!) markets. I wouldn't be okay with it if it was some smaller company being shut out of accessing YouTube; why should that stance waver just because the aggrieved party is the big "M"?
Actually, Internet Explorer has already been the center of attention in EU competition law claims a while back (recieving one of the largest fines ever given out under EU competition law) and has since conformed with EU law.TheEvilCheese said:Google owns the market because it's easy to use, fast and above all: Familiar.
I hope Google Counter-Claims against Internet Explorer. That'd be some poetic justice right there.
This is what is known as a half truth.Smith also calls Google out on blocking Microsoft's Windows Phones from accessing all of YouTube's features, though it implements full YouTube functionality for Google's Android phones and Apple's iPhones. Microsoft has a YouTube app ready to go for Windows Phone 7, but says Google hasn't given it permission to access YouTube as it has with other companies.
^This. Google also doesn't cram it's search function into my computer with various products. I wish I could say the same for Bing/Ask and all the other bullshit out there that tries to creep it's way into my browser every time I install something.Enkidu88 said:Maybe Bing can't compete because it's complete crap? Just a thought Microsoft.
Actually, they can't, because that would be an unfair use of their search engine monopoly to ruin their competition in the smart phone business. (It would also violate Net Neutrality, but that's another story) It would be as if Microsoft programmed Windows to not allow people to access Google or use Chrome. Since Windows is so ubiquitous, it would all but destroy Google.Slavoc said:They're getting mad because Google won't let their phones n such access youtube.... well Google owns it and can decide who can access it.
Joined just to say how accurate this statement is, especially on this topic.aesondaandryk said:This site is turning into Digg. Too many kids who blow smoke about a topic they know nothing about.
Lol, that's fantastic; my first call of 'space laser' actually worked (well, close enough XD), and amusingly enough "wild animal" unleashes an angry wife on the laptop - not sure what the thinking behind that one was, but damn funny association!Utrechet said:http://www.google.com/chromeos/demolab/
Notice how original of advertising Google did there? If you can advertise AND interact with your customer, you will increase profits. I guarantee it.