I recognize the title, and he has a "right" to make it in any state he wants. It's not like we can sue him, but it should be obvious he WANTS people to be playing a working game; he obviously doesn't want mass issues like this.EternalFacepalm said:You're joking, right? Right?Katana314 said:FOR FUCK'S SAKE, how long will it take this idiot to start a rolling beta!!!
Invite 1,000 or so people to participate in early versions of the next update, and release only to them. When (not if) they encounter bugs, patch those, and then release the version that works for all 1,000 to the public.
Notch is absolutely horrible at releasing working patches. I'd say Valve is equally bad, but we've at least heard they TRY with internal and somewhat-external playtesting.
It's an open beta. It means the bugs will be there, and they will be fixed as soon as possible. The point of having an open beta, is that you much, much easier spot bugs. Who do you think spot more bugs - 20 people, or 2 million?
The fact is, he has several million people playing the game already. Fact is, it's already been sold. It may be beta, but when a beta product is so public (like G-mail was for YEARS after it was common use) it does need to be treated with respect. You can bet Google didn't just put up the latest SVN build right away to their 100 million users, deciding "If it breaks something, who cares? It's technically a beta."
The normal definition of beta software has been somewhat broken when it enters such full use that many people don't even realize it's a beta. Vindictus, a F2P MMO, has won awards and has plenty of followers and common players, despite technically being in "beta".
Like the "RPG" it's a term that's kind of lost its definition. Think of Minecraft based on how it's used. And how is it used? It beat out AAA games at the Game of the Year awards, and has over a million users.