Most Evil Human In History Aside From the Big Two

[rt052192]

Walt Disney. he has the evil gene unfortunately.

Please explain why?

Haha yea sorry. Kind of not serious. It was from the Simpson's episode Cape Feare. The judge ruled that Sideshow Bob had the "evil gene" and proceeded to say that Hitler had it, Walt Disney had it, and Sideshow Bob had it. At least I think that was the episode...the scene I mentioned happened but maybe another episode.

So yea. Was not serious. Merely a pop culture reference to my favorite show, The Simpsons.

 

[Sozac]

Judas killed Jesus, but that was probably already mentioned.

 

[Araxiel_1911]

Blatherscythe, for raising such a tough and backbreaking question that is followed by a lot of arguing and debating.

But jokes aside;
I personally would put Reichsführer-SS, Heinrich Himmler on top of that list

Spoiler

 

[Chrisscogg_teh_Newbie]

any and all trolls :3 also liberals.

By just saying liberals are evil without cause and probably to arouse anger I belive you are trolling.

Accurate representation of the above poster.

okay, yeah. They're not "evil" just misguided, same can be said about feminists. but I don't want to talk about them. Anyway, what realy constitutes "evil." Looking over the thread I see that Hitler and Stalin coming up a lot. Doesn't anyone know that both *belived* that they were doing the right thing for their people (Ayrans and Communists, resectivly), they just happened to hurt a lot of people either on accident or not. Don't think I'm a nazi or a commie or anything, cuz I'm not. I'm just sayin' the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Think about it. On a side note, I tend to side with the conservitives.

Hitler was so mentally messed up that he thought what he was doing was right, usually his actions benifited Germany until the final months of WW2 where his orders and plans cost them greatly. Stalin rose Russia out of the dark ages and industrailized it, at the cost of an ungodly sum of lives, he didn't care about life in general. Both ruled through fear and propoganda and Stalin regularly purged his party, while Hitler preffered his troops to self regulate.

Also how are Liberals misguided? A middle-ground between the Left and the Right sounds like a good politcal ideology.

While that is true, he still believed his cause and war to be just, and damn near everyone in Germany sided with him, so he must have been doing something right. As for Stalin. Stalin had a lot of political opposition, and naturally he wanted to stay in power, cuz he thought he could do more good for his people in office then out of office. + Russia is burtal. More then likely, HE would of been exacuted if he didn't do what he did. Not all of those "In Soviet Russia..." jokes are exagurations, you know.

On the subject of liberals. Ever heard o' Vietnam, yeah, *that* shitty war. The NVA and Veitcong often emplyed women and children in there Armies (that's plural variant of Army, right?) Well, when civilian war corrospondents got a story that involved U.S. soldiers killing women and children (who, more then likely fired first) , guess what hit the front page that day. As a result, when the war-weary American soldiers returned from 'Nam, American citizens (At that time, most American citizens had a liberal veiw, due to this Hippster revolution, and the VERY liberal newspapers being printed in the States.) treated them like shit, labeling them as (but not regulated to) "baby-killer" and "Murderer", when they were just trying to survive and do their job. Imagine urself in that position, being hated because you were just trying to do your job. I have evidence, read The-Stars-And-Stipes printed during Veitnam, than read the same story in a newspaper printed State-side and see for your urself that all news, newpapers, news chanels, and anything related to news is full of shit.

I like this dicussion. Also I appaude you if you read the entire post.

One last thing. The same shit that happened durring 'Nam still happens today. I am also thoroughly convinsed that women and children are just as capable (if not, more so) then men.

==End of rant==

 

[Blatherscythe]

any and all trolls :3 also liberals.

By just saying liberals are evil without cause and probably to arouse anger I belive you are trolling.

Accurate representation of the above poster.

okay, yeah. They're not "evil" just misguided, same can be said about feminists. but I don't want to talk about them. Anyway, what realy constitutes "evil." Looking over the thread I see that Hitler and Stalin coming up a lot. Doesn't anyone know that both *belived* that they were doing the right thing for their people (Ayrans and Communists, resectivly), they just happened to hurt a lot of people either on accident or not. Don't think I'm a nazi or a commie or anything, cuz I'm not. I'm just sayin' the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Think about it. On a side note, I tend to side with the conservitives.

Hitler was so mentally messed up that he thought what he was doing was right, usually his actions benifited Germany until the final months of WW2 where his orders and plans cost them greatly. Stalin rose Russia out of the dark ages and industrailized it, at the cost of an ungodly sum of lives, he didn't care about life in general. Both ruled through fear and propoganda and Stalin regularly purged his party, while Hitler preffered his troops to self regulate.

Also how are Liberals misguided? A middle-ground between the Left and the Right sounds like a good politcal ideology.

While that is true, he still believed his cause and war to be just, and damn near everyone in Germany sided with him, so he must have been doing something right. As for Stalin. Stalin had a lot of political opposition, and naturally he wanted to stay in power, cuz he thought he could do more good for his people in office then out of office. + Russia is burtal. More then likely, HE would of been exacuted if he didn't do what he did. Not all of those "In Soviet Russia..." jokes are exagurations, you know.

On the subject of liberals. Ever heard o' Vietnam, yeah, *that* shitty war. The NVA and Veitcong often emplyed women and children in there Armies (that's plural variant of Army, right?) Well, when civilian war corrospondents got a story that involved U.S. soldiers killing women and children (who, more then likely fired first) , guess what hit the front page that day. As a result, when the war-weary American soldiers returned from 'Nam, American citizens (At that time, most American citizens had a liberal veiw, due to this Hippster revolution, and the VERY liberal newspapers being printed in the States.) treated them like shit, labeling them as (but not regulated to) "baby-killer" and "Murderer", when they were just trying to survive and do their job. Imagine urself in that position, being hated because you were just trying to do your job. I have evidence, read The-Stars-And-Stipes printed during Veitnam, than read the same story in a newspaper printed State-side and see for your urself that all news, newpapers, news chanels, and anything related to news is full of shit.

I like this dicussion. Also I appaude you if you read the entire post.

One last thing. The same shit that happened durring 'Nam still happens today. I am also thoroughly convinsed that women and children are just as capable (if not, more so) then men.

==End of rant==

Sounds more like hippies than Liberals. Vietnam was a war the US had no business in anyways, yet jumped in with the USSR to continue fucking up the world by placing dictators in power and turning a blind eye to their actions as long as they prevented the others idealogy.

Also, women and child soldiers aren't new to warfare, the NVA used them for the psycological aspect as well as boosting their numbers. Most of them were brainwashed anyways and your right, probably did fire first, the hippies didn't care and thus found an anti-war/government excuse. Also, patriotic idiots hated Nam Veterans because they "gave up" or were responsible for "losing the war".

 

[SillyBear]

On the subject of liberals. Ever heard o' Vietnam, yeah, *that* shitty war.

Kind of ironic that you are complaining about Vietnam when it was conservative America that got everyone into that mess to begin with.

 

[Ham_authority95]

Me, because I will masturbate tonight, never get married, and never go to church.

I am a godless heathen who hates family and a stable society. Fear me...and watch news stories about me so advertisers will pay the station money.

 

[Chrisscogg_teh_Newbie]

any and all trolls :3 also liberals.

By just saying liberals are evil without cause and probably to arouse anger I belive you are trolling.

Accurate representation of the above poster.

okay, yeah. They're not "evil" just misguided, same can be said about feminists. but I don't want to talk about them. Anyway, what realy constitutes "evil." Looking over the thread I see that Hitler and Stalin coming up a lot. Doesn't anyone know that both *belived* that they were doing the right thing for their people (Ayrans and Communists, resectivly), they just happened to hurt a lot of people either on accident or not. Don't think I'm a nazi or a commie or anything, cuz I'm not. I'm just sayin' the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Think about it. On a side note, I tend to side with the conservitives.

Hitler was so mentally messed up that he thought what he was doing was right, usually his actions benifited Germany until the final months of WW2 where his orders and plans cost them greatly. Stalin rose Russia out of the dark ages and industrailized it, at the cost of an ungodly sum of lives, he didn't care about life in general. Both ruled through fear and propoganda and Stalin regularly purged his party, while Hitler preffered his troops to self regulate.

Also how are Liberals misguided? A middle-ground between the Left and the Right sounds like a good politcal ideology.

While that is true, he still believed his cause and war to be just, and damn near everyone in Germany sided with him, so he must have been doing something right. As for Stalin. Stalin had a lot of political opposition, and naturally he wanted to stay in power, cuz he thought he could do more good for his people in office then out of office. + Russia is burtal. More then likely, HE would of been exacuted if he didn't do what he did. Not all of those "In Soviet Russia..." jokes are exagurations, you know.

On the subject of liberals. Ever heard o' Vietnam, yeah, *that* shitty war. The NVA and Veitcong often emplyed women and children in there Armies (that's plural variant of Army, right?) Well, when civilian war corrospondents got a story that involved U.S. soldiers killing women and children (who, more then likely fired first) , guess what hit the front page that day. As a result, when the war-weary American soldiers returned from 'Nam, American citizens (At that time, most American citizens had a liberal veiw, due to this Hippster revolution, and the VERY liberal newspapers being printed in the States.) treated them like shit, labeling them as (but not regulated to) "baby-killer" and "Murderer", when they were just trying to survive and do their job. Imagine urself in that position, being hated because you were just trying to do your job. I have evidence, read The-Stars-And-Stipes printed during Veitnam, than read the same story in a newspaper printed State-side and see for your urself that all news, newpapers, news chanels, and anything related to news is full of shit.

I like this dicussion. Also I appaude you if you read the entire post.

One last thing. The same shit that happened durring 'Nam still happens today. I am also thoroughly convinsed that women and children are just as capable (if not, more so) then men.

==End of rant==

Sounds more like hippies than Liberals. Vietnam was a war the US had no business in anyways, yet jumped in with the USSR to continue fucking up the world by placing dictators in power and turning a blind eye to their actions as long as they prevented the others idealogy.

Also, women and child soldiers aren't new to warfare, the NVA used them for the psycological aspect as well as boosting their numbers. Most of them were brainwashed anyways and your right, probably did fire first, the hippies didn't care and thus found an anti-war/government excuse. Also, patriotic idiots hated Nam Veterans because they "gave up" or were responsible for "losing the war".

Hippies=Liberals. You have a excellent point, however it doesn't change the fact that American blood was spilled, and those who spilled it were hated for it. Mostly by hippies. Now, as for the "Patriotic idiots" , like I said, both sides are full-of-shit. I side with the conservates cuz they appear slightly less full of shit. They're still full of shit though.

 

[Instant K4rma]

Michael Bay. Do I really have to explain this one?

Really?​

 

[Chrisscogg_teh_Newbie]

On the subject of liberals. Ever heard o' Vietnam, yeah, *that* shitty war.

Kind of ironic that you are complaining about Vietnam when it was conservative America that got everyone into that mess to begin with.

it is, indeed ironic.

 

[SeeIn2D]

Vlad The Impaler.

 

[benbenthegamerman]

Rodrigo Borgia or several of his kin are frontrunners in the evil race. So is Adolf Hitler and Gaius Caesar (Caligula).

 

[Araxiel_1911]

Michael Bay. Do I really have to explain this one?

Really?​

 

[smegmar]

Every member of the Rothschild Banking Dynasty.

 

[Filiecs]

General Tang Shengzhi, the guy in charge of the Rape of Nanking.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanking_Massacre

 

[Purple Shrimp]

But if put to the task and had to come up with a name? Gavrilo Princip, the man who assassinated Archduke Franz Ferdinand. Why him? Because his action of killing the Archduke sparks the Great War(which wiped an entire generation of people off the planet), which leads to Hitler being super pissed off(he was a soldier), which leads to him forming the Nazi party, which leads to WW2, which leads to the holocaust, which leads to the Cold War and all it's bull shit, which leads to the United States training middle eastern soldiers to fight off the "evil" communists, which leads to us giving weapons and training to Osama Bin Laden, which leads to him getting pissed that we left, which leads to him ordering the attacks on 9-11, which leads to our current fucked up situations including, but not limited to, us owing China many many trillions of dollars we'll never be able to repay. He shot one man, and in turn fucked over the entire world.

this is pretty dumb reasoning, since why not blame (for example) Gavrilo Princip's great-great-great-great-grandfather, who is responsible for Princip's birth and also probably did at least one evil thing in his life? there's a point along the causal chain of events at which people at one end stop being responsible for events at the other end, simply because you can't predict them anymore, and to say Gavrilo Princip should be blamed for the cold war is pretty silly

 

[Del-Toro]

Ghengis Kh...

No, wait, he brought a people that had been warring against itself incessantly together, maintained his empire through rule of law and only went on the warpath because if he didn't it would have all been for naught (plus who can resist that loot, he was only a man, after all).

Vlad The...
Oh, restored peace and order to Transylvania. Admittedly went about it brutally, but putting an end to crime in a time when crime basically just meant murder, rape, and violent robbery (a redundant phrase in Canada, fyi) means that one is inclined to remember that it doesn't matter how you go once you're gone.

George W...

Ha ha, not even close. Not. Even. Close. The wars waged in the middle east weren't his sole decision, more than a few dems voted in favour of the patriot act (and they've extended it, if memory serves), his administration can't really be held totally responsible for the state of the US economy upon it's termination, unless the accuser is a moron, and even his administration's excesses don't even bring him fucking close to the #3 spot.

Mao, I guess, if we're going by high score, which he certainly has. I mean, to me, killing isn't necessarily evil, but he did it for Communism, alot. And I'm not fond of Communism, at all. If anyone tries to convert me, I've read the literature, still dislike it.