Most obvious plot hole.

Death God

New member
Jul 6, 2010
1,754
0
0
Darkness62 said:
Death God said:
Why trust just ONE terminator to do the job. She barley killed one so just send in 5 or 6 to do the job better. And why not kill Sarah when she is no threat at all. A.K.A. When she's 5! There are so many point to exploit.
That was cut from the original script,John Conner was taking over the last of Skynet, breaking down the door in fact. Skynet sent all the Terminators at the same point in time. The Terminator T-101 in the first movie and the untested prototype T-1000 model done at the last minute in order to preserve itself. John sent his father Kyle Reese and The 850 model 101. Then the time line gets all messed up after that. The Terminators that appear to be made by Dell or Alienware appear in the later movies.
Ah, well that's somethings I never knew before.
 

Blemontea

New member
May 25, 2010
1,321
0
0
CplDustov said:
DragonChi said:
LOTR..the Giant Eagle Race could just fly someone with the ring right into Mordor, into mount doom and drop off the ring. completely bypassing hours of unnecessary bother.
I think the story takes places over about a year. No? It's been a while I'll admit. So I agree with that in mind your point makes a loooooot of sense. Tolkien had an explanation of Eagles not meddling in human affairs too much but it was pretty.... lame.
actually one explanation also is that the eye of suaron would over power the eagles killing them and the ring would drop into mordor... but then again the fellow ship could just distract the eye like they did at the end of the movie so its a massive plot hole.

OT: ... give me an hour or so ...
 

BelmontClan

New member
Nov 15, 2009
152
0
0
Zachary Amaranth said:
God had altered His law prior to that without requiring anything of that magnitude. Amazingly enough, the idea of absolving sins through an act of horrific brutality is kind of weird. Not to mention if this event was predetermined, it undermines the free will we're supposed to have.

But mostly, God could have just said "knock it off."

Your answer doesn't explain why God would do it, it explains why an offshoot of Jewish culture would fabricate the concept of absolution through further sacrifice.
It is a difficult thing to comprehend, I agree. But in the Christian tradition, the point of Jesus dying for our sins was he became a person like you and me and took on that burden of saving people from sin. Although God could have come, waved a hand and made it better, then it takes away from the entire point of his Son becoming human and saving people from their sin.

If you look at the Bible, even Jesus wasn't really thrilled with what he could tell was coming. He even goes so far as to plead "If you can take this away from me, do it, but if you can't, then I will do this for you."

This is such a difficult thing to explain, so I hope I'm making sense. Other people have tried to make sense of this concept too. I'd suggest reading "Lamb: The Gospel According to Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal" for one interpretation (at times humorous, at times sad) as to why the sacrifice.
 

CplDustov

New member
May 7, 2009
184
0
0
Blemontea said:
CplDustov said:
DragonChi said:
LOTR..the Giant Eagle Race could just fly someone with the ring right into Mordor, into mount doom and drop off the ring. completely bypassing hours of unnecessary bother.
I think the story takes places over about a year. No? It's been a while I'll admit. So I agree with that in mind your point makes a loooooot of sense. Tolkien had an explanation of Eagles not meddling in human affairs too much but it was pretty.... lame.
actually one explanation also is that the eye of suaron would over power the eagles killing them and the ring would drop into mordor... but then again the fellow ship could just distract the eye like they did at the end of the movie so its a massive plot hole.

OT: ... give me an hour or so ...
hmm well a slight plot hole but it lends more credibility I guess. "more" being the operative word.
 

omicron1

New member
Mar 26, 2008
1,729
0
0
Blemontea said:
CplDustov said:
DragonChi said:
LOTR..the Giant Eagle Race could just fly someone with the ring right into Mordor, into mount doom and drop off the ring. completely bypassing hours of unnecessary bother.
I think the story takes places over about a year. No? It's been a while I'll admit. So I agree with that in mind your point makes a loooooot of sense. Tolkien had an explanation of Eagles not meddling in human affairs too much but it was pretty.... lame.
actually one explanation also is that the eye of suaron would over power the eagles killing them and the ring would drop into mordor... but then again the fellow ship could just distract the eye like they did at the end of the movie so its a massive plot hole.

OT: ... give me an hour or so ...
Ok, geekery coming up.
You saw the point in the battle at the Black Gates where the eagles entered the battle, right? They were up against the Nazgul, which were on pretty much an even footing with them. Problems start when you think about the eagles just flying straight into Mordor at pretty much any point from the Council of Rivendell through that last battle...
* They would be seen. The Eye can look a lot farther than just inside the bounds of Mordor, and tends to be drawn to the ring. Carrying it in the sky makes it a pretty easy target.
* It's questionable whether the ring wouldn't count as being worn if grasped on an eagle's talon. If it would be worn, the implications are severe. If Gandalf could not wear the ring, Gwaihir the Windlord would be just as susceptible to its effects.
* You've got a whole country full of orcs between you and Mount Doom. A large number of these orcs have bows. Does "pincushion" sound like fun?
* Nine nazgul (at the beginning of the story), prepared and ready for anti-Eagle combat. No surprise on the eagles' side. Assuming Gandalf rode one of the eagles, that evens the odds a bit in his favor, but I think (judging by the "Gandalf vs Witch King" face-off in the White City) that the Witch King just tips the scales back the other way.

* So in order for the eagles to have even a chance of succeeding, they have to be sent out when the Witch King is no longer in the equation - by the official storyline, this means after the Battle of Pelennor Fields - and while the Eye is somewhat distracted, E.G. at the beginning of the Black Gate confrontation. They can't be sent out from the Rivendell council. They can't be sent out from Lothlorien. Thus, to the fellowship, they are a nonviable tactic. Unfortunately, by the time they become viable Frodo and Sam are long gone, and their only chance to get back with the group (their encounter with Faramir) ends with them tromping off towards Mordor, alone.



Worst plot hole ever... hmm... can't think of much right now. Oh, I remember. Spoiler Warning sez: Why do you need to turn into a Big Daddy to tell a little sister (whom you've rescued about fifty of) to open the little sister door? Why not just ask nicely?
 

Knight Templar

Moved on
Dec 29, 2007
3,848
0
0
I think I'll target another good game.

In the Game when a character is killed but their body is still mostly intact you can bring them back to life with a divine spell item or what-have-you. When you (the main character) dies this doesn't happen. Now initially this makes sense, you die and the Bhaalspawn taint returns to the throne of blood ergo your soul is now broken, unable to put back together by "normal" means. However Imoen is also a child of Bhaal yet she can be brought back the same way any other party members can.

What the hell?
 

Blemontea

New member
May 25, 2010
1,321
0
0
omicron1 said:
Blemontea said:
CplDustov said:
DragonChi said:
LOTR..the Giant Eagle Race could just fly someone with the ring right into Mordor, into mount doom and drop off the ring. completely bypassing hours of unnecessary bother.
I think the story takes places over about a year. No? It's been a while I'll admit. So I agree with that in mind your point makes a loooooot of sense. Tolkien had an explanation of Eagles not meddling in human affairs too much but it was pretty.... lame.
actually one explanation also is that the eye of suaron would over power the eagles killing them and the ring would drop into mordor... but then again the fellow ship could just distract the eye like they did at the end of the movie so its a massive plot hole.

OT: ... give me an hour or so ...
Ok, geekery coming up.
You saw the point in the battle at the Black Gates where the eagles entered the battle, right? They were up against the Nazgul, which were on pretty much an even footing with them. Problems start when you think about the eagles just flying straight into Mordor at pretty much any point from the Council of Rivendell through that last battle...
* They would be seen. The Eye can look a lot farther than just inside the bounds of Mordor, and tends to be drawn to the ring. Carrying it in the sky makes it a pretty easy target.
* It's questionable whether the ring wouldn't count as being worn if grasped on an eagle's talon. If it would be worn, the implications are severe. If Gandalf could not wear the ring, Gwaihir the Windlord would be just as susceptible to its effects.
* You've got a whole country full of orcs between you and Mount Doom. A large number of these orcs have bows. Does "pincushion" sound like fun?
* Nine nazgul (at the beginning of the story), prepared and ready for anti-Eagle combat. No surprise on the eagles' side. Assuming Gandalf rode one of the eagles, that evens the odds a bit in his favor, but I think (judging by the "Gandalf vs Witch King" face-off in the White City) that the Witch King just tips the scales back the other way.

* So in order for the eagles to have even a chance of succeeding, they have to be sent out when the Witch King is no longer in the equation - by the official storyline, this means after the Battle of Pelennor Fields - and while the Eye is somewhat distracted, E.G. at the beginning of the Black Gate confrontation. They can't be sent out from the Rivendell council. They can't be sent out from Lothlorien. Thus, to the fellowship, they are a nonviable tactic. Unfortunately, by the time they become viable Frodo and Sam are long gone, and their only chance to get back with the group (their encounter with Faramir) ends with them tromping off towards Mordor, alone.



Worst plot hole ever... hmm... can't think of much right now. Oh, I remember. Spoiler Warning sez: Why do you need to turn into a Big Daddy to tell a little sister (whom you've rescued about fifty of) to open the little sister door? Why not just ask nicely?
If you ever had any questions about the eagle plot hole read above this good sir just obliterated every question i had about the eagles.

OT:... still working on it ...
 

CargoHold

New member
Sep 16, 2009
284
0
0
Terminator Salvation-
The motorbike-bot can sense and dodge multiple flying chunks of metal debris while in motion, and yet is tripped up by a single piece of wire stretched across the road? Whut?
 

Canid117

New member
Oct 6, 2009
4,075
0
0
Skorpyo said:
Star Wars Episode 2:

If the jedi aren't allowed to love, why were two obviously consenting 19-to-20-something-year-olds sent on an all expenses paid vacation to the planet-o-love?

I think Plinkett had far more material there than he actually used.
They are not allowed to form a bond of love. There is nuthin in the rule book against certain fun activities.
 

Nomanslander

New member
Feb 21, 2009
2,963
0
0
Star Trek 2009

How the hell does that red stuff create black holes and time travel?

District 9

How the hell does that red stuff work as spaceship fuel and turning you into one of the prawns?
 

x434343

New member
Mar 22, 2008
1,276
0
0
meowchef said:
Modern Warfare 2

The No Russian mission.

Why do the members of the airport security/government/ANYONE not check security recordings to check and make sure it wasn't only an American slaughtering people... but instead just invaded the US.
In order to have a plausible reason to invade the US. It's a helluva lot easier to find the ID that points to the US and invade than find 2 Russian bodies and one American body and say that it was America's bloody nature.

Alternatively, they forged US IDs.
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
The entire new Star Wars Trilogy is just dripping with plot holes and terrible storytelling but I'm going to focus on the one plot hole that always stands out for me because it's the basis for so much of the prequel setting including the video games.

My Issue is with the Clone Army and everything associated with it.

Where do I begin? Okay so Obi-Wan tracks down a Mandelorian Bounty Hunter to Kamino where he finds out that Jedi Master Sifo-Dyas had ordered a Clone Army. Well right away I have to ask why. To what end did Sifo-Dyas order this army to be made? Was he working for Palpatine, or with Count Dooku? Did he just think having a bunch of clones on standby would be nifty? Pick any answer you choose because the movie doesn't seem to give a shit.
Still Ordering Clones isn't like ordering a fucking Pizza, you don't order an Army of killer Mandelorians without having a good God Damn reason.

Okay leaving that aside for a moment.
The Jedi Council spends most of Attack of the Clones explaining that they're peace keepers not soldiers and that they don't have the manpower to fight an all out war for the Republic.
So I guess it's handy that Palpatine just happens to have this Clone Army on standby?
These clones take about 10-15 years to grow meaning he would have had to have started the cloning process years before all this shit started going down.
And nobody blinks an eye at this? Nodoby thinks that maybe some shit is up?
clearly not because the Jedi just jump right in and start fighting alongside the clones happy as the day is long!

Lastly, this Clone Army is fully equipped! They have space ships, tanks, air speeders, battle cruisers, boats, walkers...so on and so forth. Well where did this Shit come from? What distant Imperial Forge World spent the past 15 years or so making enough armour, artillery, munitions and heavy support vehicles to outfit a whole damned army? The prequels make such a big damned deal about the economic goings on of the Galaxy that I find it hard to believe nobody noticed this huge stockpile.


Look I'm sure that a lot of this is explained in the Expanded Universe and if that's the case then it's still bullshit. If a storyteller has to rely on supplementary material that other people write in order to fill in the gaping holes in the original narrative...well then it's a shitty story to begin with.
 

LogicNProportion

New member
Mar 16, 2009
2,155
0
0
Definitely Lord of the Rings

Why didn't they just ride the eagles to Mordor, drop the ring while flying by over the damn volcano, and end it all?

Goddamn...

And thus:

Star Wars > LotR
 

Lotet

New member
Aug 28, 2009
250
0
0
Minischoles said:
Lotet said:
Minischoles said:
Lotet said:
Minischoles said:
-=Spy=- said:
Judgement101 said:
Littlee300 said:
Avatar
1. Why didn't you orbital bomb those tree huggers
2. Just drop two tank on top of their main base :p
3. How they are able to sharpen the spears but they can go through bullet proof gas. I mean if you can sharpen them, so they can't be too hard... (my logic may be flawed, don't be ass holes when proving it)
4. Maybe I am just being a baby because the bad guys won.
My issue with that movie is that they spend all this time saying they are after a mineral then blow up the only thing stopping them from getting it yet they completely ignore it to try to wipe out the aliens for no better reason than assholeism.
Just posting because I'm addicted to TVTropes, but:

1: The Corp wasn't a military group, it was simply private contractors made mostly of ex-soldiers. I doubt that they had the ability to attempt orbital bombardment. After all, they seem fairly arrogant, and I doubt the Stockholders would be happy with them packing orbital bombardment weaponry against an enemy armed with bows and arrows.
You don't need weaponry to bombard someone from orbit. They came there on a starship, all they have to do is chuck asteroids at them, with absolute impunity.
It's not even hard, anyone with any decent level of maths ability could do the math, so people that can build and pilot FTL starships could certainly do it.
Jupiter stops asteroids from hitting us. Pandora is a moon of a gas giant, likly no asteroids and good luck trying to pluck one from an asteroid belt (if there is one). they trying to get stuff worth 20 Million per Kilogram, causing massive damage to the place is, well, counter-productive.

spend 5 million in starship fuel and logistics to cause a Billion Trillion dollars worth of damage so you can save 120 million dollars worth of military gear and personel? (numbers pulled out of the air)
A moon in a gas giant likely means tons of rocks, since around most gas giants, you get a planetary ring (although in some cases it is rather small). And you don't need a huge rock to really mess up someone's day, especially after they all gathered in one spot. You don't even need massive amounts of energy to pluck a rock out and put it into an injection orbit, for any people advanced enough to have starships and FTL, they should know all about orbital dynamics.

Hell even now, people have done the maths that would get asteroids from the asteroid belt injected into stable earth orbits for mining purposes. To say they can't do it is just stupid. You don't need an asteroid big enough to cause an extinction event, you can pretty much rain down small rocks with absolute and utter impunity, wiping out any centre of resistance - broadcast a message telling them 'play nice or daddy wipes out you and your entire species'.
you're either incredibly intelligent or you have no idea what you're talking about.

*scratches head*
I mean, I'm no mathematical whiz but I don't see how our current technology and understandings can allow us to get an asteroid from a swirling ring of rock and metal using something made by us that likely has less mass than the asteroid in question and have it sent over to us. what IS the energy or method used for that kind of act anyway?
Admittedly most current theories are just that - theories, and are entirely thought experiments, since we really have no way to reach asteroids or rocks.
Well there are many ways to manage it, it all depends on the level of technology, and how fast you want the asteroid to arrive. The cheapest (but slowest method) is the method used in most space probes these days, which is a very low energy, low fuel consuming engine, that constantly accelerates. Strap a few of those onto the surface of a rock, and a few months/years later, you've got an asteroid arriving.

The fastest method, has been used in hard sci-fi (most notably in the Night's Dawn Trilogy by Hamilton) and that's controlled nuclear explosions, similar to the Orion Engine concept, you simply knock the asteroid into an insertion orbit.

In these terms, it's simply a matter of the energy inputted, once you put that energy in, the asteroid will move - whether it be slowly or somewhat faster. Mass matters very little with a massive injection of energy, or with constant low acceleration.

plus why are you behaving with such a simplified approach to this? you're acting like you enemies will do exactly what you want them to do so you can cause maximum damage, instead of say, attacking you're ground base? and that's just the simplest approach. c'mon though, even if you calculate, object mass, planetary rotation, level of gravity and all that I don't see how you can acuratly direct a big lumpy (incredibly lumpy) rock thousands of miles down. I like pointless debates, can you tell?

need I repeat $20,000,000 per Kilogram? a chunk as heavy as a car gone will cost you $20 Billion!

to quote a much enjoyed fictional report on a similar, though not quite the same, subject:
Patrick Marstall said:
Rocks are NOT 'free', citizen.
and you can't use the word "impunity" if you're striking your source of income when you're attacking.
Except they did do exactly what I would want. Most natives on the planet, congregated in exactly the same place. Hell you don't even need to use a giant rock. Sacrifice the shuttle, set it on an orbital trajectory similar to the kind ships like Virgin Galactic and the Vomit Comet use. Instant kinetic kill object. This kind of thing has long been theorised by most militaries with access to space, simply because it is very cost effective. You wipe out all those pesky natives, you instantly clear out any vegetation.
Any species that has control of space, can strike with absolute impunity, and there would be nothing the natives could do about it. Hell even hurling a few tons of metal at select points would cause massive damage if they were accelerated sufficiently.
I don't know man, that tree is pretty freakin' huge, it would stop a lot of mass coming down. they could knock the tree down though, which is what they did. didn't they then proceed to torch the place? anyway, if you don't cause a lot of damage you won't get them, if you casue too much you lose your resources. these people, like humans, keep fighting as long as thier leader (or current leader for revolutions and the like) thinks it's in thier people best interests and would casue you harm in one way or another unless you get to the ground and cut off their escape, ready for some genocide. and how long does it take for them to move out of the impact radius compared to the time it takes a rock to get from orbit to surface?. I find a direct attack with automatic weapons, mechs and gunships seemed like the appropriate action to take for "costs vs damage". it only seems wrong in hind-sight, after all, they're just barbarians, how hard could they be to beat?.

EDIT: they were congregating. it probably was the most native on the planet but it wouldn't have been most of the total (or the continents total). if they even spent that much time trying to set up an obital bombardment the natives would have swarmed ground zero anyway.
 

slipknot4

New member
Feb 19, 2009
2,180
0
0
Modern Warfare 2
How do you launch a nuke without the launch codes or a partner the turns the other set of keys?
 
Mar 31, 2009
105
0
0
TurtleBay said:
Amyler said:
Oh my god, in before FF7 Areis' dieing. =o
This has to be the biggest plot hole in the major event of a video game story of all time. Surprised nobody else mentions it.

For those of you who don't play Final Fantasy games, there is this very useful inventory item called Phoenix Down that you can use to revive fallen allies. Players are careful to save their Phoenix Downs for when they characters are killed as it helps you progress through the game. In Final Fantasy VII part of the story is that this character needs to die. No matter how many Phoenix Down you have you cannot revive her (as it would spoil the story) even if you have been able to previously revive other dead characters with this item.
I would have to disagree about phoenix downs bringing people back form the dead. It brinsg people back from a state of unconsciouness (hence why the effect of the death spell is called KO- knocked out.) So if a phoenix down is seen as an item that brings people back from a state of unconsciousness, rather than an item the brings people back from death it makes sense.

If a phoenix down brings people back to life, then why would anybody ever die (including npcs) in any final fantasy game?
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
LogicNProportion said:
Definitely Lord of the Rings

Why didn't they just ride the eagles to Mordor, drop the ring while flying by over the damn volcano, and end it all?

Goddamn...

And thus:

Star Wars > LotR
Okay it's not explained very well, but it is explained.

The whole point of sneaking the ring into Mordor is to sneak it in.
It's explained several times that Saruman has spies everywhere and is shown to utilize the winds and flocks of Crows to his advantage.

Gandalf explains that Sauron is looking for the ring and the ring wants to be found and that their greatest advantage is that Sauron doesn't know where they are. Flying a bunch of Giant Eagles into the borders of Mordor would have been really obvious.
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
the_baku_eats_dreams said:
TurtleBay said:
Amyler said:
Oh my god, in before FF7 Areis' dieing. =o
This has to be the biggest plot hole in the major event of a video game story of all time. Surprised nobody else mentions it.

For those of you who don't play Final Fantasy games, there is this very useful inventory item called Phoenix Down that you can use to revive fallen allies. Players are careful to save their Phoenix Downs for when they characters are killed as it helps you progress through the game. In Final Fantasy VII part of the story is that this character needs to die. No matter how many Phoenix Down you have you cannot revive her (as it would spoil the story) even if you have been able to previously revive other dead characters with this item.
I would have to disagree about phoenix downs bringing people back form the dead. It brinsg people back from a state of unconsciouness (hence why the effect of the death spell is called KO- knocked out.) So if a phoenix down is seen as an item that brings people back from a state of unconsciousness, rather than an item the brings people back from death it makes sense.

If a phoenix down brings people back to life, then why would anybody ever die (including npcs) in any final fantasy game?
Exactly. Characters that fall in battle are incapacitated, disabled, wounded, knocked out or in some cases swooning, but never actually dead.
Hence why not only Aeris but like half the playable cast of FF:IV are able to be killed without hope of resurrection
 

DarkSoldier84

New member
Jul 8, 2010
96
0
0
I just remembered one of my own, but it's not that obvious.

Star Trek: The Next Generation "The Measure of a Man." Starfleet wants to disassemble Data so they can reverse-engineer and mass-produce him. Data refuses, but Commander Bruce Maddox insists that Data can't because he's Starfleet property. Picard defends Data's rights as a sentient being at a tribunal. The judge advocate general concludes that Data is a person and subject to inalienable human rights.

Where's the plot hole? I believe Starfleet recognized Data's status as a person when they allowed him to attend the Academy (in that episode, Data displays his commendations) and commissioned him as an officer.

Because I'm such a huge geek, I'll try to resolve some of the holes brought up before.

TERMINATOR
We're not seeing the first change in the timeline, we're seeing at least the third.
* Timeline A-B: Sarah Connor has a kid, some company makes SkyNet, SkyNet tries to kill everyone. John-1 leads the Resistance and kicks SkyNet's ass. SkyNet sends a T-800 back to kill John before he's born.
* Timeline C-D: Sarah Connor overcomes the T-800 without help from the future. John-2 is born, the timeline continues as above until John-2 sends Kyle Reese back after the T-800 to protect his mother.
* Timeline E-F: The events of Terminator. Kyle Reese becomes John-3's father while helping Sarah defeat the T-800, gives her the information about Judgment Day, and ends up turning her into a raving lunatic. T2 continues from here.

LORD OF THE RINGS
It's the One Ring; the Eagles didn't want to go anywhere near it in fear of getting corrupted. I don't have the books with me, but I believe they responded to Gandalf's "Help me get the One Ring into Mount Doom" with something to the effect of "That's the One Freakin' Ring! We fly with that thing, we paint a huge-ass target on our beaks for Sauron and the Nazgul!"

MASS EFFECT
I got nothing re Jack's breakout. This plot hole could have been resolved with a line of dialogue from Jack to the effect that she blew a nearly-suicidal amount of power against the YMIR Mechs and that she could die if she did it again. Arbitrary display of power in cutscene: resolved.

STAR WARS: ATTACK OF THE CLONES
Diddy_Mao said:
My Issue is with the Clone Army and everything associated with it.

To what end did Sifo-Dyas order this army to be made?
He foresaw darkness in the galaxy's future. The Republic did not have a standing national army and was relying more and more on the Jedi to solve its problems. Sifo-Dyas commissioned the army so the Republic would have a legitimate fighting force when the dark time came.

Sidious found out about it and had Dooku kill Sifo-Dyas as his final Sith test. Dooku adjusted the clones' training regimen to include Order 66 and we all know what happened after that.

We know where they came from, but I can't find anything about where their equipment came from. My guess is that Sidious appropriated the funding as a line item in some obscure budget bill. I still don't have an answer how Sifo-Dyas made the down payment in the first place.

HALO: REACH
The Package: Yes, it's Cortana in her 26th-century USB drive. She's not the Forerunner MacGuffin. She's decrypting/analyzing/doing something with the data on the artifact and eventually cracks the location of Installation 04 and learns that it's a Forerunner weapon, so she reroutes the Pillar of Autumn when it slips out of system and then Halo 1 begins.

Plot Hole: There's no in-game indication that Jun got to safety with Dr. Halsey. A radio call to say "We're safe; see you in orbit, Noble Six" would have been nice.
 

Dr. Octogonopus

New member
Aug 31, 2010
72
0
0
When they killed Mace Windu in Star Wars
Mace Windu was played by Samuel L Jackson
How do you kill Samuel 'Motherfucking' L Jackson, hes the black chuck norris

Seriously though Uncharted made no sense:
1 - Nathan finds Drakes coffin under the sea (how did he know it was there?)
2 - Drakes diary has a page missing that Nathan finds in a Nazi U-boat (why didnt the nazis have the entire diary if they had the missing page?)
3 - Said Nazi U-boat is found on top of a waterfall (why is it there?)
4 - The waterfall is found on the first island. An island that Nathan only finds because he has the rest of the diary (how did the Nazis find it?)
5 - The Nazis in the U-boat were killed by the zombie things and yet you only see the zombie things when you get to the 2nd island
6 - Drake dies alone surrounded by the zombie things and yet somehow his diary is in a coffin under the sea (who put it in the coffin?)