My, my, my. I was hoping someone would bring up the "Critiques not reviews" idea. It's like dodging the lava flow, by diving into the volcano. From an academic standpoint a critique is held to much higher standards than a review is.creationis apostate said:He critiques games, doesn't review them, and why should someone have to research a game to play it? Besides, he finishes most games and has more to do than just sit around playing with himself.
Most people don't need to research a game before they play it, however a reviewer should. And... He doesn't finish most games. I've seen him dump an embaressingly small amount of time into some games while "critiquing" them. Once the video was uploaded and viewed he was (quite rightfully) called out on this. So he responded by stomping his feet like a petulant brat, and resorting to straw-man fallacy and vulgar suggestion.
If you don't have the time to do a proper & systematic analysis perhaps you shouldn't call yourself a critic/reviewer? If he was honest and simply referred to himself as a comedian who does a quick "first impressions" review then I would treat him with a lot more respect.